Journaling 15-25 stock portfolio with margin of safety focus. Own businesses, don't rent stocks. SuperInvestor Cloner. Not advice. #Stocks#ValueInvesting
Investment Strategy
1. Own businesses, donβt rent stocks.
2. Focus on individual businesses, not industries or popular themes.
3. Protect capital and boost returns with a Margin of Safety at purchase.
4. Select high-quality businesses.
5. Keep a long-term mindset as an owner.
@HatedMoats I've owned $META in my personal acct since Feb 2022, avg cost $159.48. I bought when nearly everyone had given up on it. I'd buy more at $525 if I had the capital. The problem with running fully invested is needing to sell something else I like to buy anything, sigh.
@marketswithmay Congratulations on getting $SPCX. I received half my request at the $135 IPO price, about a 1% position. I think it's worth $150-160, so a small discount. It makes sense if you have an ownership mindset. I'll buy more when the price pulls back . . .
Excited to have received half my requested shares in $SPCX in my personal acct at the IPO price of $135; awaiting first trade today but it looks to rise 20-30%. My estimate of business value is $150-160; assumes orbital data centers are successful with 20-25% mkt share by 2035.
Net interest income on client cash is largest source of rev. (84% in β25), but $SCHW advised clients to move cash to higher-yielding choices amid Biden inflation spike. Put clients 1st, rewarded with more assets. Asset mgmt industry is highly fragmented, with $SCHW growing share
Added Schwab $SCHW this week, a 2% starter position, $86 avg cost. Business value est. is $115-120, a ~26% safety margin, a wonderful business at an attractive price.
25th business in portfolio; filled all our planned slots. Glad to add this strong, growing, profitable business
Mr. Market seems worried AI-driven cash sorting will compress $SCHW healthy margins. Possible, or AI may improve efficiency, lowering costs further, attracting more assets. $SCHW a master cutting costs, costs-to-client assets an industry-leading low of 0.12%, vs. ~0.40 for others
Well, look at $NOW now!
Took a position starting late March growing to a 3.5% position by early April, avg cost $99, thinking the AI-threat sell off was overdone.
Relieved the rebound happened so soon.
@marketswithmay Thanks, @marketswithmay, nicely put. Socialism is a method to gradually transfer private property to those who control government. Communism is a method to rapidly transfer private property to those who control government. Both are a disaster for the vast majority of people.
@marketswithmay Exactly! I think the sell off was due to narrow focus on the supply constraints while missing the 35% revenue growth despite those same constraints.
I added to my position today at $143, building patiently towards a 6% position.
Probability-weighted 3-year annualized expected return on $ANET from current levels: ~9.5β10%
Bought more at a ~24% discount to the weighted BVE after the classic sell-the-news reaction.
What am I missing?
Added to $ANET today at $143 after the post-earnings selloff. New avg cost: $123, position 3.9% of portfolio on 6% target.
Updated 5-year DCF Business Value Estimates (BVE):
Bull $232 | Base $192 | Bear $142
Probability-weighted BVE: $189.50 (~24% discount at current levels)
@HatedMoats Thanks! Itβs been gut-wrenching to watch, but trying to invest with my head not my gut :)
Researching now $CSGP likewise gut-wrenching, but trying to understand whether itβs a reckless or insightful CEO buying https://t.co/pb3ww0n472.
Thoughts?
@marketswithmay Good idea, makes sense.
Researching $CSGP now. Itβs been quite profitable but price has been hammered recently. Overreaction to https://t.co/gDRzemuPgK investment and AI worries, or recognition of long-term value destruction by a reckless CEO and deficient Board?