overundersimplifier

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@woodyVSworld Dude football is the epitome of games with dumb rules lol. NFL is unwatchable since like 2014

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@RoyalTorqe @fabiosays @dannykoh68 @eyesthedon It is somewhat subjective in that case. I’ve only ever seen it called a handful of times. Usually on a shot that goes very close to or underneath the attacking player when the keeper is right behind him. But on passes it’s quite a simple yes/no

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@whualfie_ Because he’s clearly virtue signaling. It just echoes that old Vance culture of people gaining clout for pointing out others

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@RoyalTorqe @fabiosays @dannykoh68 @eyesthedon If it was played to him or he interferes with the play (goalie vision or movement or something) it would be offsides. His offside is judged when the ball is played to him.

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@rkotoka @talkSPORT I’ve thought about this.. Maybe just a dashed line halfway between the center and top of the box which you can’t pass behind.

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@5149jamesli No it’s a psyop to crash real estate prices so they can buy up

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@BadSportsRefs Almost as bad as the no foul call when Pickford came out

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@Ezanathegreat_ @DailyTurkic I suppose you feel the same about Genghis and Caesar?

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@philipp_thaler @kumoriRaver Oh yeah absolutely. He just didn’t want to give it up after college

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@philipp_thaler @kumoriRaver I mean he played D1 college here. Was best hitter and best pitcher over there it’s all relative

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@philipp_thaler @kumoriRaver Haha my buddy went and played pro there for a couple years

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@Nwamama_05 That’s actually an amazing stat

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@SamRaj49 @grok Left with rivets probably better than both I imagine

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@_santabeliever @jollyr0g3r452 Funny you bring up parades and simple math. There are about 250k parades held per year in the US. About 250 cities hold gay pride parades once per year making the total about 0.01% which is a third as gay as Ancient Greece. Interesting!

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@Magnus_9_IOI @MartinTweats Oh and it’s more likely that Christian morality was derived from what innate moral sense existed in what became the west. Similar to how the 7 day week predates the Old Testament but we think our 7 day week derives from it

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@Magnus_9_IOI @MartinTweats Yes and you choose objective vs relative based on your feelings. The Truth is that it’s all feelings which are essentially evolved: https://t.co/QRoLeWqoNv

But dumber people on Kohlberg level 1 do need nominally objective morality so you’re right about that part

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

Artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships, and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean. Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences. They may imitate or even simulate, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational, and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom. #MagnificaHumanitas

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@RedMarylandGoat @Mattimagus @ShitpostRock2 Well Pharoh was about to but God made him not do it “But the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh, and he did not listen to them, as the LORD had spoken to Moses.” Lmao

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@AMilitantAgnost @ChristCert In your future arguments you should just own 50/50. You’re not ignorant insofar as you know it must be one or the other and you know the probability or either is indeterminate. It just reduces to 50/50 in that situation

[overundersimplifier @SamB11C]

@AMilitantAgnost @ChristCert I see why we can’t reconcile tho. You see it as a deck with 2 cards and I see it as an infinitely large deck. I think both framings are pretty valid actually but you could have said that at the beginning. Being uncertain about a binary holds different probability than a set obv