Can diffusion transformers do in-silico neuroscience?
In a new preprint, we train models to generate neural (fMRI) time series. We condition per time step by injecting conditioning tokens directly in context. We evaluate on hundreds of unseen task conditions.
Some results! 🧵
This constitutes just a first step towards in silico experimental design but already works surprisingly well, with tons of open paths for improvements!
Paper: https://t.co/3727sjQc1u
Can diffusion transformers do in-silico neuroscience?
In a new preprint, we train models to generate neural (fMRI) time series. We condition per time step by injecting conditioning tokens directly in context. We evaluate on hundreds of unseen task conditions.
Some results! 🧵
We quantify training support distance in terms of both spatial activation maps and language embeddings of task descriptions, both showing distinct degradation profiles.
@iamgingertrash@Tom_A_Lynch@boneGPT That reads to me like a well functioning hedging market, at which point you're paying to decrease vol which is akin to using an inflating currency? Bit skeptical of choosing to stabilize against what is pretty much the least fungible / most volatile / annoying-to-store thing
@Tom_A_Lynch@iamgingertrash@boneGPT Why? we already have evidence today that currency volatility limits MOE adoption (and inversely, the success of stables)
@iScienceLuvr I much prefer codex responses in general, they tend to not be as verbose and don’t have this “to conclude … what I’d actually do … your best option … to summarise” awkward structure that the chat models have