Soil health professional and independent farmer. Passionate for environment and climate friendly food production. Father, ex-military and wannabe cellist.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova Al-Sharaa/Julani became Syria’s leader through internal rebel politics — not because NATO ‘made him president.’
Your screenshot doesn’t prove anything. It only shows how chaotic and ungoverned the whole process is.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova Here you go. Here’s the official US State Department FTO list — including all current and all delisted organisations.
Contrary to your false claim UÇK/KLA has never appeared on it. Not once.
https://t.co/R8AR6R7eqZ
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova It should be easy for you to provide valid evidence — not vague opinion articles and fabricated quotes.
Since you haven’t, the conclusion is obvious: you’re either a victim of propaganda or repeating it deliberately.
I genuinely hope you find the light eventually. Good day.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova Also, you’ve now crossed from debate into conspiracy fiction.
The UCK was never Islamist, never listed as a terror group, and NATO certainly didn’t ‘make al-Qaida president of Syria’.
I think we’re done here.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova What I can say is that there were wrongdoings on both sides.
But in Serbia’s case – before and during the war – they were clearly more systematic and organized.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova The UCK has never appeared on any official US terror list. Not on the State Department’s FTO list, not on the Terrorist Exclusion List, not anywhere.
Your claim was ‘radical Islamist terror organisation’, which no state, no UN body, no intelligence agency has ever asserted.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova You’re quoting a 1999 opinion piece that speculated about risks. It was never a government assessment, never confirmed, and never adopted by any state. It has zero relevance — and it doesn’t support your original false claim.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova A remark from a diplomat is totally different from an official designation — which was made by nobody.
Also, your original false claim was that the UCK was a ‘radical Islamist terror organisation’, which is utter nonsense by any standard.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova You’re quoting a 1999 opinion column? No state or international body ever classified UÇK as ‘radical Islamist’. Not the UN, EU, US, Russia or Serbia. Simply because it wasn't. End of story.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova An absolut lie. No state, no intelligence agency and no international body ever listed the UCK as a ‘radical Islamist’ group – not the UN, the EU, the US, Russia or Serbia itself.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova Full of BS. The UCK was never labelled ‘radical Islamist’ by any serious source at the time. Not even Russia. And only because it was not. That narrative emerged much later, because it fits to your stories.
If facts are swapped for stories there's no conversation.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova Your claim has no evidence behind it. ICTY was a UN court with international judges, and its rulings stand in international law.
@SRhodes63223@OlgaBazova No, it wasn’t. The ICTY, with judges from China, Egypt and Malaysia, confirmed systematic ethnic cleansing and mass expulsions carried out by Serbian forces. Those rulings still stand. Nothing ‘debunked’ about it.