@Elex_Michaelson@AC360@Elex_Michaelson wants you to believe that a system with no voter ids and allows ballot harvesting is somehow normal. 🫠
Elex lost the script when he stopped using common sense!
So… we’re expected to believe that in California, out of three candidates, the third place candidate, who conceded her campaign because she was mathematically eliminated from the run-off, suddenly received tens of thousands of votes from mail-in votes which all came in *after* Election Day, while the other two candidates received no late mail-in votes, and the second place candidate (who was surging as a Republican candidate in the bluest state in the country) is now in third place and mathematically eliminated from the run-off.
… and we’re supposed to trust that this is an honest and true election.
If you’re not angry about this, you need to be.
So… we’re expected to believe that in California, out of three candidates, the third place candidate, who conceded her campaign because she was mathematically eliminated from the run-off, suddenly received tens of thousands of votes from mail-in votes which all came in *after* Election Day, while the other two candidates received no late mail-in votes, and the second place candidate (who was surging as a Republican candidate in the bluest state in the country) is now in third place and mathematically eliminated from the run-off.
… and we’re supposed to trust that this is an honest and true election.
If you’re not angry about this, you need to be.
@FrankLuntz@ForecasterEnten The level of gaslighting is outrageous -
They want you to believe that @TheDemocrats preferred an outsider to clean LA than two insider bureaucrats in the runoff elections 🫠
They think the level of fraud is normal and that the sudden spike is not anomalous!