Manohar Singh

Senior Journalist , Deputy Editor and Bureau Chief UNI-Varta,New Delhi. Ex PTI-Bhasha, Hindi Daily the NaiDunia, Jagaran.
Comments on economy and politics.

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@SanchetiC @pervaizalam @DrSYQuraishi @PankajPachauri भाई ,मृत्यु प्रमाण पत्र का डाटा पहली बार कैप्चर किया जा रहा है। कंप्यूटर डाटा से डुप्लीकेट नामों को छांटना काटना आसान हुआ है।
और इस बार की एस आई आर प्रक्रिया को सब लोग मिलकर सफल बना दें तो फोटो मतदाता कार्ड प्रकारान्तर वयस्क लोगों का नागरिकता कार्ड जैसा होगा।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@pervaizalam @DrSYQuraishi बड़े सम्मान के साथ कहा जा सकता है कि कुरैशी साहब जो दिखना, दिखाना चाहते हैं, बात उसके उलट है।
एस आई आर इस बार जिस गंभीरता से की जा रही है और इसमें इस तरह टेक्नोलॉजी का उपयोग हो रहा है उससे बहुत सी गड़बड़ियां पहली बार दूर हो रही है। इसमें राजनीतिक दलों के एजेंट भी जुड़े हैं।

[Ranjeet @khubiramji]

@pervaizalam @envyk_blr @DrSYQuraishi @INCIndia he needs to point out where things have gone wrong without specific claims.

Calling a process a scam without sharing why is the scam.

This is an attack on a country from ideologues.

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@Bhairo76158449 @suhasinih Kargil was compromised, Nuclear Deaeal was compromised, Operation Sindur was compromised, Energy Trade with Russia abandoned because of compromise and now would be trade deal in also a product of compromise in advance.
बोगस बात।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@suhasinih क्या यह कहानी फूटे गुब्बारे को बुलाने की कोशिश नहीं है?

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@TheEconomist Gone are the day's when you were taken as a relatively honest voice for liberal trade and genuine democracy.
Of late, in the emerging world of social media you have exposed yourself for your deception and half trouth. India is beyond comprehension for biased entities like you.

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@winyourshine @pbhushan1 पिताजी से विरासत में वकालत मिल गयी, लगता है डिग्री जुगाड़ वाली है।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@pbhushan1 A morley corrupt can write only a post, to ignite public mood needs special connect.

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@Gabbar0099 Letters@HidutanTimes?

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@Chellaney यूनुस साहब के संगठन ने क्लिंटन के कोष में पहले कुछ डाल रखा था, ऐसा भी बताया जा रहा है।

[Dr. Brahma Chellaney @Chellaney]

Muhammad Yunus presided over rampant rights abuses and extrajudicial killings as head of Bangladesh’s Islamist-leaning interim regime. Yet his deep ties to the Clintons have served him well throughout his career.

In the latest example, Yunus was presented with the Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) Award by Hillary Clinton herself at Georgetown University.

Yunus pioneered microcredit for which he and the Grameen Bank he headed jointly received the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize, after Bill Clinton lobbied for him. In presenting the prize, the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee recalled Clinton’s 2002 statement: “Dr. Yunus is a man who long ago should have won the Nobel Prize and I’ll keep saying that until they finally give it to him.” The chairman then added, “Now Clinton will no longer need to remind us.”

The award also carried an unmistakable geopolitical message. The committee chairman expressed the hope that “this peace prize will represent a possible approach to the Muslim part of the world” amid the post-9/11 tendency to “demonize Islam.” He added, “It is an important task for the Nobel Committee to try to narrow the gap between the West and Islam.”

The Nobel Peace Prize has, to this day, remained largely a geopolitical instrument, with the Norwegian Nobel Committee often using it to advance a particular political worldview under the mantle of peace. Yunus’s prize, and the committee chairman’s own explanation of its purpose, offered a revealing example.

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@IndianGems_ आज फिर कुछ दिमाग में उठ गया?

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@LiveLawIndia Wold you please post the official resolution of the said organisation?

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@CommonBS786OM मज़े ले रहे हैं, मैदान से हटकर चल रही आंदोलन की नौटंकी का।
महल हवा में नहीं,,
पंजाब, यूपी, उत्तराखंड के मैदान में नींव रखने पर खड़ा हो सकता है।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@RaghvendrYdv कोई कितना ही जिमनास्टिक कर ले मतदाता सूचियां की विशेष गहन पुनरीक्षण प्रक्रिया संवैधानिक सामाजिक और लंबे समय से प्रतीक्षित है। यह पूरी पारदर्शिता से राजनीतिक दलों की निगाह के नीचे हो रही है।
हमारे देश के निरीक्षण मतदाता भी दूसरे देशों के साक्षर मतदाताओं से ज्यादा जागरूक हैं।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@mkatju कार्य वैधानिक के, आवश्यक और प्रतीक्षित था।
चुनाव आयोग नियम कायदे से चल रहा है, नागरिक सहयोग कर रहे हैं। डिजिटल प्रौद्योगिकी की मदद से गति व पारदर्शिता बढ़ी है।
राजनीति चलती रहती है, चलती रहेगी, राजनीति में कोई ताली बजाता है, कोई गाली देता है। भारत अपने ढंग से चलता है।

[Manohar Singh @SansadMarg]

@MhndrYadav @mkatju He was not CJI, only a judge.

[Surjit Bhalla @surjitbhalla]

13 crore "deleted voters"? The data say about 70 lakh eligible voters removed without adequate explanation, where SIR is final. 7 of every 8 removals were justified. Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing. A thread

[M Geopolitics Bharat @tmgeopolitics]

@KenRoth False and fake news

[S Gurumurthy @sgurumurthy]

During the emergency we organised a reception for Shanti Bhushan in the Congress grounds in Teynampet in Chennai. We all celebrated him for fighting for Rajnarayan and Indira

See how he became utterly corrupt later

The father and son Bhushan duo grabbed with BJP govt support 4.7 acres of Tea garden to set up a high class education business but that attempt failed as Govt resumed possession

Two points.

They shamelessly got land from their ideological enemy BJP

Had they retained it, the land would be worth Rs 35 cr today

But they were more lucky with Mayavati largesse than with BJP largesse

See here

They for 20000 sq meter land allotted by Mayavati in Noida for defending her in Noida land scam

They paid for that land Rs 3cr. Today's it is worth believe it
Rs 1300-1400 cr

They also evaded stamp duty of Rs 1.35 cr while buying land in Allahabad Civil lines. The court directed them to pay it

Prashant Bhushan who has got this illgotten wealth is the man fighting for democracy and against Corruption

What a shame? How shameless he is ?

Read on for more details

The public and legal controversies surrounding Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan involve specific land transactions and legal actions that became subjects of intense political and legal scrutiny, particularly during their involvement with the anti-corruption movement (India Against Corruption).

1. Land and Property Controversies

• The Palampur Tea Garden Land Case (Himachal Pradesh):
In 2010, the Kumud Bhushan Education Society (a trust run by the Bhushan family) was granted permission by the then-BJP government to purchase 4.66 hectares of tea garden land in Palampur for setting up an educational institution.

Political opponents later alleged that the land was acquired at highly discounted prices. Under Section 118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, land-use for tea gardens cannot easily be modified.

In September 2014, following a probe initiated under the Congress state administration, the local administration ordered the vesting of the land and its buildings back to the state government, citing a failure to utilize the land for its designated educational purpose within the stipulated timeframe.

Noida Farmhouse Allotments (Uttar Pradesh):

In 2011, it emerged that Shanti Bhushan and his other son, Jayant Bhushan, were allotted two 10,000-square-meter plots of land in Noida by the Mayawati-led Uttar Pradesh government under a discretionary farmhouse development scheme in 2009. Critics flagged a potential conflict of interest, noting that Jayant Bhushan had been appearing as a lawyer against the Mayawati government in a high-profile local park case. The Bhushans maintained that the application followed standard regulations and denied any wrongdoing.

Indian Express reported on 14.12.2011 that the CAG audit found rules were flouted for allotment of 20000 sq meter land to Bhushans and excheque lost Rs 145.8 cr

They paid a subsidised price of Rs 3 cr for the land.

In Today's value AI says the loss to the exchequer represents atleast Rs https://t.co/HFSkbAcczH

• Allahabad Property Stamp Duty Case:
In 2011, civil authorities in Allahabad ruled that Shanti Bhushan had evaded ₹1.35 crore in stamp duty during his purchase of a historical property in Civil Lines, Allahabad.

The Assistant Stamp Commissioner ordered him to pay the outstanding duty along with a monetary penalty. Shanti Bhushan contested the ruling, labeling it a legally flawed order driven by political pressure.