Sarah Hester

Christ follower| Ethan’s wife | Mother to 4 littles | Forever looking at sunsets

[Haus 🇺🇸 @HausenUSA]

Nah. We're not doing this anymore.

[Giga Based Dad @GigaBasedDad]

How to break feminist propaganda with one simple video:

[Megan Basham @megbasham]

This is part of why support for gay marriage has dropped 8 points among Gen Z and 15 points among Republicans, the lowest in a decade.

Because we now see the rotten fruit of the surrogacy trade—motherless and fatherless children.

[Allie Beth Stuckey @conservmillen]

You’re holding a picture of a mother’s womb. Where is she?

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@DeChristianLife I have seen this happen in real time.

[Katy Faust @Katy_Faust]

According to a new book by biologist Dr. Francisco Güell (whose fertility research project was funded by the European Union) children conceived through #IVF face significantly increased medical risks. Here are a few:

Imprinting Disorders
•Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome: +480%
•Russell–Silver syndrome: +1030%
•Angelman syndrome: +370%
•Prader–Willi syndrome: +120%

Neonatal / Perinatal Outcomes
•Very low birth weight (<1500g): +200%
•Perinatal death: +120%
•NICU admission: +100%
•Neonatal seizures: +880%

Medium- and Long-Term Diseases
•Retinoblastoma: +680%
•Hodgkin’s lymphoma: +263%
•Cerebral palsy: +160%
•Major congenital heart defects: 36% higher risk

Additional conditions reported as elevated
•Leukemia
•Liver cancer
•Kidney tumors
•Central nervous system tumors
•Epilepsy
•Autism spectrum disorders
•Hypertension
•Ventricular dysfunction
•Asthma

Freezing embryos adds additional medical risks, including:
•Pediatric cancers
•Type 1 diabetes
•Cardiovascular problems
•Speech disorders
•Allergies
•Treacher Collins syndrome
•Spina bifida

The explanation for these increased risks? IVF manipulates embryos during early developmental stages when genetic imprinting and epigenetic programming are occurring, making them vulnerable to environmental changes.

Yet none of these risks appear in fertility clinic materials. The author offers three main explanations:

1. Financial conflicts of interest
Biotechnology companies and fertility clinics fund research, conferences, and professional associations.

2. Influence over scientific publishing and messaging
Industry-connected experts help shape research agendas and publication narratives, affecting how findings are framed in journals and media coverage.

3. Weak oversight and limited follow-up
There is insufficient long-term monitoring of IVF-conceived children. Some databases tracking outcomes have removed follow-up data.

Manipulating human life at its earliest stages is risky for the very few children who make it through the process alive. But the multi-billion-dollar global fertility industry is desperately hiding those risks.

[Tom Buck (Five Point Buck) @TomBuck]

One of the major reasons I ate at @ChickfilA was because of the Christian values they once held. To be honest, there are restaurants that have better chicken.

Chick Fil A has every right to change their values.

I have every right to change where I eat. And I will!

[Tom Ascol @tomascol @tomascol]

This is sad to me. My family &amp; I have long enjoyed eating at @ChickfilA. No more. From now on we will head to @SteaknShake with it's healthier food &amp; big, beautiful American flag.

[Jillian Anderson @Jillie_Alexis]

If you ever drove alone in a car with a mask on, I don’t care what you think about RFK.

[Reverend Jordan Wells @WellsJorda89710]

Burned Charlie Kirks legacy down to get there.

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@wretchedmarine 👏🏼

[Smash Baals @smashbaals]

If you want to be a Polygamist you can go be a:

- Mormon
- Muslim
- Pagan

But you can’t be a Polygamist Christian

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@WakeUpPatriott Absolutely not.

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@smashbaals 👏🏼👏🏼

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@MikeWingerii It’s actually wild

[Sarah Hester @SarahHester]

@thisisfoster 👏🏼👏🏼

[Alisa Childers @alisa_childers]

There's a reason why people don't want to speak out about Candace Owens. She has a massive following and wields quite a bit of power over narratives. Her apologists can be brutally unfair and unkind. But I am thankful for voices like @conservmillen who took considerable risk in posting the video that is being criticized here, and I think it's worth defending.

So, here's my encouragement. Just apply critical thinking skills. Let's take a look at what is going on here:

Candace begins her criticism of Allie with an ad hominem attack (attacking the person instead of the argument) mixed with gaslighting. (Portraying Allie like she is having a breakdown or going crazy.)

Then she commits the straw man fallacy in which she mischaracterizes Allie's position while continuing ad hominem attacks (you are "not interested at all" in finding out what happened, you are "hiding" etc...) Then she leaves out the part in which Allie advises her followers to ask good questions and employ critical thinking. (For example, spotting logical fallacies.)

Listen very carefully to what Candace says. She does not bring any evidence to back up what she is claiming about Allie and her motivations. She ends by telling everyone to listen to their "intuition." No evidence, just character assassination.

I am not persuaded.

[Lila Rose @LilaGraceRose]

Abortion didn’t make your voice possible, Stevie Nicks—it silenced another’s forever. No career, no fame, no art is worth the life of a child.

[News Nomad 🗞 @The_Nomad_News]

ALLIE BETH STUCKEY: THINK before making accusations

“This isn’t a Netflix series. It’s not an Agatha Christie novel. You’re not watching a whodunit movie!” 🔥

“If you’re implicating a real person in a murder plot, [it better be] true and backed by hard evidence.”

“The words we say not only affect real people’s lives— they carry weight in eternity.”

@conservmillen

[Allie Beth Stuckey @conservmillen]

When someone accuses you of being a some kind of -ist or -phobe, the proper response isn’t “No, I’m not,” it’s “I don’t care.”

Don’t give these people any power over you