Saurav Singh

Another Brick in the wall.

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@HelleLyngSvends Thankyou @AmitShah for cancelling her Visa

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@munafno1 @AMIT_GUJJU Bhaiya aapki khud ki kuch credibility hai Jo aap Lahiri ji pe comment kar rahe ho ?

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@itsme_tarique @SwatiSheth123 We all know there is a universal word for people like you that starts with T. Ever heard of Brigadier Rudra Pratap. He has rightly defined your genesis.

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@itsme_tarique @SwatiSheth123 He will also teach you that your forefathers belonged to Ram only.

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@openletteryt Ye murkh kaun hai.

[अखण्ड भारत संकल्प @Akhand_Bharat_S]

धर्म परिवर्तन से आस्था और संस्कारों की जड़ें नहीं मिटतीं! 🙏

मुस्लिम धर्म अपनाने के बावजूद इस बुजुर्ग के दिल में आज भी प्रभु श्रीराम का नाम और सनातनी संस्कार जीवित हैं। ❤️🚩

कहते हैं, पहचान केवल मजहब से नहीं, अपनी जड़ों और संस्कारों से भी होती है।

जय श्रीराम! 🚩
🎥 पूरा वीडियो अवश्य देखें!

#Rajdharma #SanatanDharma

[Dr. Neha Das @neha_laldas]

No. of Tribes added in ST List:
2004-2014 = 12 (By Congress)
2014-2024 = 117 (By BJP)

What Congress proposes, BJP implements - on steroids!!

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@amitkilhor Arnab k show me to Tera camera ruk Gaya tha na 👹

[True Indology @TrueIndology]

[Mythbusting Thread] ckers

In this thread, I will debunk the MYTH that bursting firecrackers is a new innovation that was recently introduced into dīpāvali festivities.

It will be shown that bursting firecrackers has always been integral and central part of dīpāvali . Since time immemorial, Hindus celebrated dīpāvali by bursting crackers.

[Mythbusting Thread] : Read till the end.

[Kreately.in @KreatelyMedia]

Sunni Muslim Woman

Finally

[Anshul Saxena @AskAnshul]

She is Nisha Kumari Bhagat, a strong voice for Tribal rights in Jharkhand.

She openly opposed religious conversions among Tribal communities in Jharkhand. She supported the demand for the delisting of tribals who had converted.

She also spoke against the influence of missionary activities in tribal areas and raised concerns about the protection of Tribal culture and traditions.

She also raised serious concerns about land grabbing, harassment, the erosion of Tribal culture, and the functioning of the Hemant Soren govt.

On 6th November, she went live on Facebook, expressing her distress and making serious allegations against the system. Hours later, she was found dead at her residence in Ranchi.

Some media outlets have already started calling Nisha Bhagat's death a suicide. This is unacceptable. The media cannot determine the circumstances of her death before a proper investigation.

There must be a thorough investigation to establish the truth.

We need answers. We need accountability. We need justice for Nisha Bhagat.

[Trunicle @trunicle]

I finally watched Ramayana to ensure that our criticism is informed by firsthand observation rather than hearsay. Having watched the film, here are our concerns:

1. Ravana and his entire clan are portrayed as a persecuted, helpless people.

They are presented almost as a community of poor souls who have been systematically mistreated by the Devtas. This portrayal invites sympathy for Ravana rather than allowing the audience to understand the moral and philosophical dimensions of his character.

2. This is less Ramayana and more Ravanyana.

Ravana has undeniably been glorified. One need only look at the number of children who, after watching the film, have begun praising Ravana to understand the impression it leaves.

3. Ravana is portrayed as an Asura, whereas he is traditionally identified as a Rakshasa.

There is a distinction between Rakshasas and Asuras in Hindu tradition. Conflating the two is not a trivial detail, particularly in a cinematic adaptation of an epic as culturally significant as the Ramayana.

4. Sita Ji is portrayed more like a contemporary, modern-day woman than the traditional divine and dignified persona associated with her.

That said, this is something we can perhaps accommodate under the creative liberties of cinematic interpretation.

5. Sita Ji addresses Shri Ram by his name.

Traditionally, Sita Ji is understood to have addressed Shri Ram with reverential expressions such as Swami or Aryaputra. Having her casually address him by his name feels inconsistent with the traditional portrayal of their relationship.

Creative liberty is certainly permissible. However, when adapting an epic that carries immense civilisational, spiritual and cultural significance, creative interpretation should not come at the expense of its underlying ethos, characters and traditional narrative.

6. Sita Ji is shown suggesting that Lakshman was wrong in cutting off Shurpanakha’s nose.

This is particularly concerning because such a statement is not found in the Valmiki Ramayana. The scene appears to introduce a moral interpretation that casts Shri Ram and Lakshman in an unfavourable light, while portraying Shurpanakha as an innocent woman whose only intention was to marry Shri Ram.

This fundamentally changes the audience’s perception of the episode and the characters involved. There is a difference between exercising creative liberty and introducing a narrative that departs from the source text in a way that alters the moral framing of the original epic.

-

Anyone defending this film on the grounds that at least Bollywood made an attempt to bring our story, the Ramayana, to the big screen is either profoundly ignorant of the epic’s cultural and spiritual significance or, one might suspect, has some vested interest in defending it.

Yes, the film deserves credit for its impressive, Hollywood-calibre visual effects, production design and technical execution. There is no denying that.

But spectacular VFX and lavish production budgets cannot serve as a licence to distort our Itihasa, misrepresent its revered characters or rewrite its foundational narrative.

We are not opposed to creative liberty. We are opposed to creative liberty being used as an excuse to distort our civilisational heritage.

The Ramayana deserves far more than spectacular visuals. It deserves authenticity, reverence and a profound understanding of the very tradition it seeks to portray.

Now in Hindi : थू है ऐसे अपने आपको हिन्दुवादी और राष्ट्रवादी कहने वाले लोगों पर जो चंद पैसों के लिए बिक गए।

[Comman Man @CommanMan777589]

Bheemti Decimated ❤️❤️❤️

Stop targeting our Gods you DIMWITS

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@RahulGandhi Ab kutte bhi lalkarne lage hai 🙄

[🅿️REETA💎 @kesh_preet_vibe]

Media bhi divide and rule ka shikar hui hai Left Media are only allowed🤓

[𝐇𝐲𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐧 @ImHydro45]

Ritu Sharma, another Brahmin candidate lost her life due to the evil reservation system.

She gave the NEET exam but was denied a seat despite scoring 605/720 in the first two counseling. But bhimtas got the seat with 500.

We as a society failed to protect her.💔

[Saurav Singh @Saurav10Singh]

@SagarH62 Batter is Aakash Chopra

[JusticeForMen @Justice4MenIN]

Two incidents: in one the accused is a boy, and in the other the accused is a girl.

An 8-year-old boy brutally attacked a 6-year-old girl. Everyone raised their voice demanding punishment for the accused child and the responsible people. As a result, the teacher, principal, and watchman were suspended, and the boy was sent to a juvenile home.

Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and people of all religions started wishing for the little girl’s speedy recovery.

At the same time, the anti-male society began beating its chest and declaring the entire male community as criminals from childhood itself.

Just two days before this incident, another incident had occurred about which no one is talking — because in that case the culprit was a girl.

A 12-year-old girl snatched a chocolate from a 4-year-old boy, because of which the boy’s mother scolded her.

For 10-12 days the girl planned her revenge, and on October 28 she succeeded in her plan. She put the child into a water tank on the roof and placed a stone on top of it. The child died.

No one is talking about this incident.

Why this double standard?

[Rishi Bagree @rishibagree]

Neha Bora

👉🏻Opposed Operation Sindoor

👉🏻Opposed the death penalty for the Nirbhaya rapist

👉🏻Idolized the dreaded Naxalite Madvi Hidma, who raped 40 women, killed 170 security personnel and 75 civilians.

[News Algebra @NewsAlgebraIND]

BIG BREAKING 🚨

Supreme Court held that bank officials cannot be booked under SC/ST Act for initiating loan recovery proceedings.