SavageTheMike

Gamer, multi-genre nerd, kicker of many shapes of ass.

[Moose on the Loose @dsimieritsch]

Mark Carney has 23 direct conflicts of interest, 4 indirect and 3 cabinet conflicts. Total of 30 conflicts of interest.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Last week, our donors helped us secure two major victories.

Crown prosecutors in Nova Scotia withdrew a $28,872 ticket against veteran Jeffrey Evely @JeffEvely for walking in the woods. This followed the major Nova Scotia Supreme Court ruling which found that the province's ban on walking in the woods violated Canadians' right to mobility.

All charges against Dr. Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 were stayed following her arrest at the University of Victoria in December 2025. She attended the campus to discuss with students unfounded claims about unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. Within minutes of her arrival, she encountered a large protest against her, and police charged her with trespassing. This is a victory for all Canadians exercising their freedom of expression on Canadian campuses.

Thank you to every donor and supporter who makes this work possible.

[Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra]

A city in Oregon was forced to permanently remove its Flock cameras after an audit found that federal agencies had access to the system.

The audit revealed that two federal agencies could access the data, including the ability to search the broader network of license plate records for up to six months.

Flock cameras are used as a mass surveillance tool under the guise of public safety.

[cbcwatcher @cbcwatcher]

UK vs Canada: Why a Free, Competitive Press Matters

The CBC piece points out the procedural differences — but skips the biggest accelerator: media

Britain’s raucous, mostly private press (tabloids, broadsheets, left and right) is cutthroat. Scandals explode instantly, polls dominate headlines, leaks flow freely. MPs feel the heat from voters and act fast to dump failing leaders

Canada’s landscape — led by government-funded CBC plus concentrated heavily government subsidized private media — is docile, less adversarial and holds the opposition to a higher standard than the government

Combined with iron party discipline and leader-controlled nominations, pressure builds slower and stays contained

Result? UK leaders face relentless public scrutiny that fuels quick internal revolts. Canadian ones can ride out storms longer

A genuinely independent, competitive press doesn’t just report failure — it forces accountability. That’s a feature, not a bug @brodiefenlon

[Great Canadian Moose @Great_Cdn_Moose]

$41 Billion of World Bank's 'Climate Change' Fund Has Gone Missing???

The globalist World Bank has "misplaced" a staggering $41 billion in "climate change" funds, an investigation has revealed. Investigators revealed that there is "No clear public record showing where this money went or how it was used."

You can’t make this shit up!

[Canada's National Firearms Association @CanadasNFA]

After allowing a day to pass out of respect for the victims, it's important to address some of the misinformation that has already begun circulating. Predictably, some anti-firearms advocacy groups moved quickly to use this tragedy to advance long-standing political objectives. That is their choice. Ours is to focus on the facts.

What we know so far is that the perpetrator appears to have held a complex mix of extremist beliefs, cherry-picked by the media and the aforementioned groups to hold up their agendas. They would have you believe he was solely a misogynist incel, but he was also an anti-semite, anti-capitalist, with political views more often than not found on the left side of the spectrum - he literally applauds communism. We also know that many details surrounding the incident remain under investigation, including who fired which lethal shots, and the performance of the firearm itself - a communist Cold War relic that was ultimately outmatched by modern police equipment when surprise was taken out of the equation.

More importantly, this tragedy reinforces a broader reality. Individuals intent on committing violence have repeatedly demonstrated that they will use whatever means are available. Canada has seen this before. Minassian, another "incel", murdered 10 people and injured 16 in downtown Toronto. His weapon of choice? A rented cargo van. The common denominator is not the tool - it is the individual intent on committing violence.

No law can eliminate every risk posed, no society can ban every possible tool of ill intent. That is why any serious discussion about preventing future tragedies must include mental health, early intervention, and effective policing - not simply additional prohibitions on legally owned firearms - which we have seen, time and time again, fail.

Had this individual not first ambushed the police, there is reason to believe the outcome could have been very different. The method chosen matters far less than the willingness to commit violence. Focusing solely on the chosen implement risks overlooking the underlying factors that make these attacks possible in the first place. A mistake we tragically continue to make.

-The Moderator

𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐠𝐮𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬
𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝐿𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑒, 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡
𝗝𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝟮𝟯, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲
https://t.co/vVQXzJTViJ

[Dano @chalackd]

Weapons designed for war?

What point do we define that metric to? Muzzle loading black powder long guns, which didn't even have rifled barrels, were designed for war at one point.

Single shot, bolt action rifles have been designed for war.

There's been small, .22 calibre firearms that use subsonic velocity ammunition, which were developed for war purposes.

Handguns, ranging from single shot Flintlock muzzle loaders, through revolvers, into semi automatics have been designed for war use.

Are we setting a definition, that every firearm ever made is to be considered a weapon of war by association, that they or their predecessors were suitable, or designed for war purposes at some point in history?

If we're going to be objective here, semi automatic rifles were available on the civilian market for almost 40 years, before their mainstream adoption by military forces. Semi automatic handguns had nearly 20 years on the civilian market before mainstream military adoption.

When civilian market technology gets adopted for military purposes, how does it suddenly become military technology unsuitable for civilian use?

You constantly point to something like the SKS, a firearm that's an 80-ish year old design, based on 125+ year old technology. It's no more capable that firearms that civilians have had access to for 125+ years. It's no more powerful or deadly than firearms that civilians have had access to for 125+ years. It's wildly obsolete by mainstream military standards, as far as it's application to military needs.

Something like the Remington model 700 was introduced to the civilian market in 1962, and became wildly popular. It's a bolt action, traditionally styled rifle, the likes of which you often tell us are entirely reasonable for civilian use like hunting. But while looking for an accurate, reliable platform to issue to military snipers, it was adopted by the US military in 1966. Does this mean that we're little more than another couple iterations of your calls to ban military grade firearms away from these calls targeting single shot, bolt action hunting rifles outright? You've already had the government target many models of single shot, bolt action rifles, as military style weapons of war, and defended that action repeatedly...

Forces in Ukraine, as they today continue to fight against Russian aggression, have been using basically any firearm that they can get their hands on. Does that make everything a potential target to be declared as military weapons that belong only on a battlefield? Again, where do we actually draw a hard line here?

Are cheap drones next? Do we ban your microwave oven because it was derived from military radar technology? Do we ban your computer, because their development was primarily driven by military weapons targeting needs? Radios and cellular phones are used for military purposes. How about GPS? Duct tape? Swords and knives were military weapons for centuries, are you going to clean out your kitchen? Axes and hammers were military weapons. Rocks and pointy sticks were tools of the battlefield for centuries before that...

Ask of these things can be misused in harmful ways, what's the actual standard here to say they're suitable for somebody to use?

[Gina Unfiltered @Gina_T1]

Hey @grok,

If developers keep the profits when things go well, but taxpayers absorb the losses when things go badly, what’s that called?

Short answer. No sugarcoating.

[Frédéric Meunier @meunierfredz]

Fact:

"Recreational shooting in closed clubs is among the sports activities with the lowest accident rates, far behind cycling or soccer. However, zero risk does not exist."

#PolyScam

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden..
You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues.

As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18.

You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing.
When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients.
This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017.

When he appealed the unfair dismissal he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000.

He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland.

At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine.

Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment

[International Cyber Digest @IntCyberDigest]

A legal study commissioned by the Dutch government has concluded that forcing universal age verification on all users would be disproportionate and clash with the fundamental rights of both children and adults.

The researchers, at the University of Amsterdam, say privacy and freedom of information are at stake, that even the strictest checks are easily bypassed with VPNs or an adult's help, and that the EU's Digital Services Act already requires platforms to make age assurance effective, so rushing to mandate more is risky.

This matters because the Dutch coalition wants a European minimum age of 15 with "privacy-friendly" verification. The study is a caution to every government treating ID checks as the fix, the same fight is playing out in many countries right now.

[Calibre @Calibremag]

Screenshots of the additional supporting evidence indicating that CGC, the entity Rathjen formerly lobbied for, operates from a Montreal Public Health office, and the distribution of Gun and Gang Violence Action Fund distribution showing that the amount of federal funds flowing into Quebec-based anti-gun and anti-gang efforts was second only to Ontario's, even though Quebec's gun- and gang-related violence numbers are lower than many other provinces that recieved significantly less funding.

It should also be noted that recipients of federal GGVAF funding were, effectively, selected by municipalities. The federal government themselves do not know who recieved the funds (I spent years ascertaining that through ATIPs), and it would have been the Montreal municipal government that dictated who recieved the bulk of over a hundred million dollars in GGVAF funding that flowed from federal coffers into Quebec.

[Calibre @Calibremag]

This is a good time to remind everyone that the current head of @Polysesouvient, Heidi Rathjen, was awarded a severance package by the Quebec Health Ministry, after working as an advocate lobbying the Ministry on behalf of a tobacco control group - something so irregular it warranted the media coverage linked below. It's also worth noting that the Quebec government refused to elaborate on why they had decided to pay someone whose job was to lobby them.

Furthermore, she used to work for @cgcguncontrol, an entity that operates out of a Regional Directorate of Public Health of Montreal office; a fact that they conveniently left off their website when it was updated some years ago, but if you google "Coalition For Gun Control Montreal," will still return results with the address of the Montreal public health office, and phone number that if you call, leads to a Montreal Public Health office directory.

Lastly, Quebec has recieved an inordinate amount of the federal government's "gun and gang violence funding," as identified in an audit of the GGVAF funding distribution.

The only conclusion to be reached from this litany of evidence is that the governments of Quebec and Montreal are inextricably linked, both in terms of personnel and funding, to Canada's anti-gun lobby efforts.

https://t.co/iucFSxWqZx

[Colion Noir @MrColionNoir]

“Why do you need an AR-15?”

Ask the police.

Because they have them.

They have the rifles.

They have the 30-round magazines.

They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you.

And nobody asks them why they need it.

Why?

Because the answer is obvious:

They carry it to confront violent people.

But here’s the part everyone skips…

Who meets that violent person first?

You do.

The cop shows up after the threat starts.

You’re the one already there.

No badge.

No backup.

No radio.

No team.

And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual.

So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second…

Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first?

That’s the question.

Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”

[Julian Assange @ImJulianAssange]

Canada is no longer a Free Market Economy, Mark Carney’s economic strategy is a shift from traditional free-market principles toward "economic nationalism" and state-directed capitalism. Corporatism is deeply associated with fascism, serving as the core economic and political framework for fascist regimes. Canada is fast becoming a Fascist Regime.

[Michael Geist @mgeist]

This was a very bad week for privacy in Canada.

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

Just so EVERYONE in Canada fully understands this

Under c-22, cell phone service providers are now required to track the location of your phone

for six months, and store it

in case the government or the police ever want it.

The more you know.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

Toronto Police Chief just confirmed the same shooters for-hire network attacked:

> The U.S. Consulate in Toronto
> Jewish schools in the GTA
> Synagogues across the city
> The search warrant where Constable Pinizzotto was killed last week

Recruitment happens through WhatsApp, Telegram, and Signal.

They’re required to film their attacks to get paid.

THIS IS A FOREIGN COORDINATED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OPERATING OPENLY IN CANADA.

[F🍁CK CARNEY @bashscriptorz]

🚨 KILL BILL S-206 🚨
The Enforcement Switch Behind Every Other Bill

⚠️ The Distraction Strategy

Parliament is flooding Canadians with dozens of bills at once — each controversial, each alarming — for one reason: to hide the keystone bill that makes them all enforceable.

That bill is S-206.

Different sectors. Different rights. One enforcement engine.

🧩 The Pattern You’re Supposed to Miss

Yes, many bills are advancing at the same time — and they fall into familiar clusters:

Due Process & Court Rights

S-206 — Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs)

C-63 — Online Harms

C-27 — Digital Charter / AI regulation

Parliamentary Power Shift

C-26 — Critical Cyber Systems

C-11 / C-18 — Online Streaming & News control

Property & Land Control

C-234 — Agriculture restrictions

S-241 — Jane Goodall Act

C-49 — Atlantic Accord amendments

Speech, Assembly & Religion

C-63, C-261, C-70, C-9

Each attacks a different freedom.
All depend on one thing: the power to punish without courts.

🎯 The Keystone: Bill S-206

S-206 is the hub.
It allows federal departments to issue penalties without:

hearings

judges

trials

due process

common-law protections

meaningful judicial review

It turns agencies into investigator, prosecutor, judge, and enforcer — all in one.

That is not democracy.

⚙️ What S-206 Enables

Data alone cannot control people. Punishment does.

S-206 is the enforcement engine behind:

Digital ID

CBDCs

Carbon allowances

Smart-meter penalties

Travel scoring

Online speech controls

Zoning & land-use mandates

Biosafety / One-Health rules

Remove the keystone → the entire system collapses.

🧠 Why So Many Bills at Once?

Because if Canadians focus on S-206, the agenda dies.

The noise is intentional:

Scatter attention

Exhaust the public

Create outrage fatigue

Prevent organized resistance

Slip the core bill through unnoticed

This is how large control systems are built.

🏗️ The Digital Governance Architecture

What they’re building:

Digital ID → who you are

CBDCs → what you buy

Carbon scoring → how you move & heat your home

Online harms laws → what you say

Smart meters → how you use utilities

Biosafety rules → what you grow or own

None of it works without instant penalties.
That penalty system is S-206.

💣 If S-206 Falls, Everything Else Fails

If S-206 is stopped:

Digital ID enforcement collapses

CBDC controls collapse

Carbon rationing collapses

Online harms penalties collapse

Smart-meter enforcement collapses

Surveillance becomes information-only

Remove the hub → the wheel falls off.

📢 The Message Canadians Must Hear

The other bills are distractions.
S-206 is the enforcement engine.

If we fight 20 bills, we lose.
If we stop one, we win.

Kill Bill S-206 — now.

🏛View the current status of Senate Bill S-206 here: https://t.co/CCp5NHb8T4