@realizingerin I'd throw my hat in for potentially coming down as a big-blocker to expand on this more. Started in 2010 and dev BCH smart contracts today. π
@pourteaux it's crazy that there are devs still willing to ignore BCH's powerful UTXO smart contracts
it's like being in 2014 and knowing what Ethereum & EVM will become and choosing to ignore it
@Crypt0_Facts@BitcoinOutLoud He didn't contradict himself.
It's objectively true that BTC is the most-invested version of Bitcoin today, but BCH is more true to the white papers design & purpose.
The investment side can change at any time.
The more interesting part imo is just how far ahead BCH tech is.βΊοΈ
@shocknet_justin@TheDesertLynx So you're saying it IS possible for a L1 to offer a competitive alternative for payments, but because the chosen token of your affection (hah) can't do it, that makes the point irrelevant?
@OverLordKratos@kazlux Same boat, especially my being in a smaller isolated area. Kind of gave up for awhile, but decided to keep trying to at least find a regular online group, and putting together a travel blog thingy around meeting people/events and just see what comes of it. π€·ββοΈ
@SteveW928@BitcoinOutLoud You can't have 'too much' hashrate, more = more resistant to attack - as long as that hashrate is secure long-term (which BTC's isn't).
https://t.co/sC0WD4plZp
Lightning has not stolen any significant fee revenue - and if it DID scale & work it would cause BTC miners to leave.