@hapemathys Der Typ wurde zwar schon vor ein paar Jahren aus der Partei ausgeschlossen , aber immer wieder in der SVP gibt es Strafdelikte . Straftäter .
@PeterBa84734077 Das ist kein Mensch das ist ein Tier . Und da soll mir noch einer von der SVP mit der Moralpredig kommen. An widerlichkeit kaum zu überbieten
Singer Nancy Sinatra stated: “When we are rid of Trump and when we stop talking about him will be a glorious day indeed.”
She watches her clock every day because she can’t wait until he is not president anymore
@felizitasfluri Wer hat denn mit dieser Initiative mit der Angstkampagne operiert.? Die #SVP und diese Haltung dass alle Migranten dafür verantwortlich gemacht werden ,ist schlichtwegs falsch und führt dazu zu Hass und Rassismus gegen Ausländer .Das führt zur Polarisierung ,das ist nicht der Weg
THE WHITE HOUSE IN PANIC MODE
When Osama bin Laden was eliminated, America’s top leaders gathered in the White House Situation Room to deal with matters of war, national security, and international terrorism.
Now imagine a different scene.
The same walls. The same secure bunker. But instead of discussing terrorism, officials are urgently debating how to protect the President of the United States from a scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein.
History has a cruel sense of humor.
Especially toward those who promised to make America great again.
A real panic has reportedly begun in the White House. Not because of China, Iran, or Russia.
An internal panic.
Because, for the first time, it is not an adviser, cabinet official, or congressman under fire.
It is Donald Trump himself.
Ten days earlier, the Department of Justice and the FBI released a memorandum intended to settle the Epstein issue once and for all.
Americans were told that no secret client list had been found, there were no sensational revelations, and the investigation uncovered nothing supporting years of conspiracy theories.
It seemed like the case was closed.
Instead, Trump's own political base erupted in anger.
People who spent years hearing about a vast elite conspiracy suddenly heard from their own government: "Sorry, we found no evidence of that."
That created an uncomfortable dilemma.
If there was no conspiracy, then they had been misled for years.
If there was, then the Trump administration must be hiding something.
Either way, it is a losing situation.
That is why emergency meetings reportedly began in the White House.
But the real nightmare was still ahead.
The Wall Street Journal published a report on Trump's connections to Epstein.
And the most troubling part was that the story could not be stopped.
The article appeared.
Along with it came photographs, social connections, parties, numerous contacts, and old interviews in which Trump referred to Epstein as a "terrific guy."
What might once have been dismissed as old acquaintances among wealthy people suddenly became a political bomb.
Especially for a man who came to power promising to fight corrupt elites.
Trump reportedly finds the Epstein issue frustrating not because he considers it important, but because he is tired of hearing about it.
The problem is that millions of his supporters see it as one of the most important political issues of our time.
So the President is forced to sympathize with people demanding answers, even though he would likely prefer the entire story to disappear.
The White House is reportedly seeking a "transparency sign-off" — a way to appear open while revealing very little.
A classic bureaucratic balancing act.
The goal is not to solve the problem, but to create the impression that it has been solved.
And the longer this continues, the stronger the feeling becomes that the crisis is slipping out of control.
Scandals become dangerous when those in power start explaining themselves and holding emergency meetings behind secure doors.
If the country's leadership must gather in the same room where operations against international terrorists were once planned in order to deal with the fallout from Epstein-related reporting, then the situation may be more serious than they would like to admit.
The irony is that for years Trump successfully used other people's scandals against his opponents.
Now a scandal has come for him.
And for the first time in a long while, the main question is not whom Trump is attacking.
The question is whether Trump can withstand the attacks directed at him.
Political crises rarely kill with a single blow.
They act more like a slow poison.
Each day they consume a little more trust, weaken allies, increase anxiety, and push those in power into making new mistakes.
Judging by the reported panic in the White House, that process may already be underway.