@HirokatuKataoka The workshop looks interesting! Will the accepted papers be published in the CVPR workshop proceedings? I could not find this on the cfp
@proff_mahdi@wacv_official@wacv_official I actually have the same: the strong accept changed to borderline, adding only positive comments... I emailed program chairs about this (on Oct 24 + reminder 10 days later) but haven't received a reply. I am worried it will impact presentation/spotlight decisions.
๐ขIntroducing our multi-modal #IndustReal dataset for procedure understanding, accepted at #WACV๐
IndustReal has various execution errors: very suitable to test robustness of algorithms!
Thanks @FvdSommen @_TimH#Stemfie3D and the great collaboration @TUeindhoven @ASMLcompany
@wacv_official Hi! I submitted R1, revised for R2 and got accepted there (I can see status and 2nd meta review, and R1 reviews). I am not able to see the 2nd round reviews, any idea when this becomes available?
@SawyerMerritt Points 1 & 2 are the same: regenerative braking extends range (gas saving) and brake life-time (reduced maintenance). Both are valid though, of course
I am delighted to be a speaker at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2022 in Aachen in June and to engage in a lively discussion with you after my presentation. I will talk about Learning to Predict Collision Risk from Simulated Video Data. https://t.co/LVyoef4vHE #joinIV22