Scizz

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@JamesMelville China also builds more solar and wind than the rest of the world combined.

I wonder why James won’t mention that 🙄

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@FASTMOVER1 And then what? He’ll tweet “PUTIN STOP”?

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@JohnStossel Capitalism has failed every time it has been tried so I don’t think that’s a very useful argument.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS You can get Grok to agree with almost anything. You need to look beyond the sycophancy at the actual maths beneath it.

Nothing about my arguments was refuted.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS It is, in fact, much more circular.

No one besides you is trying to define any constants via Planck units.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 3/Thermodynamics remains emipirically valid.
In fact, just today I used the Stefan Boltzmann law to measure the temperature of my samples during sintering, with the help of a radiation thermometer.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS I have no issue with Planck's work.
My issue with your "work" is the loop of circular logic which defines kB via itself.
That is not what Planck did.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @dafalgoutDennis @FreeSpeech4Me_U @notEvileconboy @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA CO2 radiates at all altitudes.
Collisions maintain LTE. The result is a constant population of CO2 molecules in the excited states as a function of temperature and hence radiation.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 2/This was understood already well over a century ago. This is how we got to statistical mechanics and later quantum thermodynamics.

You have unfortunately not stumbled on any new revolutionary insight. Nor have you disproven anything regarding standard textbook thermodynamics.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 1/Nope.
You clearly don't understand what my argument even is.

I further suspect that you have zero formal scientific education.

To you it might seem revolutionary and profound that macroscopic thermodynamics arises from underlying quantum-level processes. But it is not.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS More numerology crank crap.
I’m sure if you try hard enough you can derive Earth’s temperature from your horoscope times your mother’s birthday.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS As I said, there is no physical meaning behind deriving the number of entities in one mole from the ratio of two lengths. It is just numerology and sophistry.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS It is essentially impossible to parse what is going on with that prompt

I suggest you try again from scratch. And ask open ended questions instead of leading questions if you want to get an actually balanced and factual answer.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS More crank numerology it seems.

There is no physical reason whatsoever why the number of atoms/molecules in a mole should be related to the ratio of two lengths nor why Euler’s number has anything to do with it.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS What on Earth is going on here?
Can’t you write a query like a normal person?

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS There is no confusion.
All you have done is take the definition of Tp:
Tp = mp*c²*kB⁻¹
And rearranged the equation as:
kB = mp*c²*Tp⁻¹

That’s all there is to it. And for some reason you pretend that this is new and insightful.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Post the link to the full conversation

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS I corrected the issue with the missing square. But you’re still missing the point.
To derive kB from first principles, all the constants must be independent of kB. Tp is not. So your logic is circular.
When you actually substitute the Planck units you end up with kB=kB.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS When you take your expression for kB and substitute the definitions of the actual Planck units you just end up with kB = kB which is trivially true.

[Scizz @Scizz8]

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS To derive kB from first principles, you need to derive it from constants which are independent of kB.

Tp is not independent of kB. To calculate Tp you need to know kB already.
Therefore, your supposed derivation is completely circular.

https://t.co/ssESLUVuhk