Scott Cav

[Scott Cav @ScottEmmart]

@RogueLou18 Let’s go Boi se

[Rodney Smith Jr @iamrodneysmith]

Dear @WhiteHouse, my name is Rodney Smith Jr., founder of Raising Men & Women Lawn Care Service in Huntsville, Alabama. Through our 50 Yard Challenge, over 6,000 kids across the country have signed up to mow free lawns for the elderly, disabled, veterans, active-duty military, first responders, and single parents. With America celebrating its 250th birthday this year and me also being born on July 4th, I wanted to humbly ask if a few kids from our program and myself could travel to Washington, D.C. to help mow the White House lawn for this historic celebration.

More than anything, I want these kids to see how a simple act of service something as ordinary as mowing a lawn for someone in need can lead to extraordinary places. What better lesson in community service than showing them that helping others can take them all the way to our nation’s capital? I’d also love to bring my American flag-themed mower in hopes that the President might sign it, so I can later auction it off and donate 100% of the proceeds to a nonprofit supporting veterans. It would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to highlight the importance of service, patriotism, and the impact young people can have when they choose to make a difference. 🇺🇸

[Scott Cav @ScottEmmart]

@hicasamadim 72

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/CJ8XbTz52M

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

🚨HERE’S THE GAME PLAN🚨

Senate Majority Leader Thune REFUSES to pass the SAVE America Act.

It’s been 124 days.

👉Thune wants nothing more than to protect Senator Cornyn👈

& his slush fund — the Senate Leadership Fund — has spent millions on Cornyn’s election.

The Senate isn’t in the business of passing legislation or electing conservatives — it only exists to protect itself.

So, if you want to hold Thune accountable, the single most important thing you can do is help elect KEN PAXTON on Tuesday, May 26th.

👉Electing Ken Paxton & DEFEATING Cornyn would be the peaceful shot heard across the nation👈

One by one, with meticulous precision, we will repeal & replace Thune’s allies.

🗓️ Saturday, May 16th — DEFEAT Senator Cassidy

🗓️ Tuesday, May 26th — DEFEAT Senator Cornyn

(Texas Early Voting: May 18 - May 22)

In addition to defeating Thune’s allies, I’m asking you to DEFUND every Republican entity that is working against us.

Do not donate a dime to the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) or the Senate Leadership Fund (SLF).

Your $ will just be wasted on Cassidy & Cornyn.

Also, you can get a REFUND from WinRed for any Republican you donated to that is no longer serving your interests:

▪️Senator Thune
▪️Senator Cornyn
▪️Senator Cassidy

You should also know that Senator Hagerty (R-TN) endorsed Cornyn.

Texas Congressmen that endorsed Cornyn:

▪️Nathaniel Moran
▪️Randy Weber
▪️Roger Williams
▪️Jake Ellzey
▪️Craig Goldman
▪️Michael McCaul
▪️Pete Sessions

If Senator Thune won’t deliver what 84% of Americans want, then we will take away what they have — peacefully.

⬇️

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Alright. I need everyone to look at this.

Not skim it. LOOK AT IT.

Because what happened in the last 24 hours on this platform is one of the most breathtaking displays of coordinated dishonesty I have ever seen from elected officials -- and I have been watching these people for a long time. I am a science teacher. I grade papers for a living. I know when someone copied.

They ALL copied.

Let me show you exactly what I mean.

@SenWarren: "safe and effective" @PattyMurray: "safe and effective" @RonWyden: "safe, full stop" @RepJohnLarson: "safe and effective. Full stop." @RepBeccaB: "safe and effective" @RepDelBene: "safe & effective" @RepGregStanton: "safe and effective" @SenatorHassan: "safely used for years" @SenatorHick: "safe and FDA approved" @TeamPelosi: "access to mifepristone" SenatorCantwell: "safe medication" SenMarkey: "SAFE and LEGAL" repdeliaramirez: "safe and reliable"

That is not a coincidence. That is a MEMO. Someone in the DNC wrote those words, sent them to every caucus member, and these supposed independent representatives of the American people just... pasted it in. Changed a word here. Added an exclamation point there. Slapped their name on it.

And then had the audacity to call YOU their constituent.
Here is the part that should make your blood boil regardless of where you stand on abortion: these people are telling you -- openly, demonstrably, provably -- that they either did not read the court ruling, are not smart enough to understand what they read, or are perfectly fine lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to check.

Pick one. Those are the only options.

Here is what the ruling ACTUALLY says -- you know, the document none of them apparently opened:

The Fifth Circuit issued a TEMPORARY STAY of the 2023 FDA rule change that allowed mifepristone to be mailed without any in-person medical visit. The drug is NOT BANNED. Not restricted from in-person dispensing. Not removed from any shelf anywhere. It is back to the rule that existed for TWENTY YEARS from 2000 to 2023 -- a rule that nobody called a "nationwide abortion ban" at the time because it was not one then and it is not one now.

The ruling was triggered by the FDA's OWN ADMISSION that the 2023 rule had "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration." Biden's Autopen's own agency admitted it FAILED to adequately study whether mailing the drug without in-person oversight is safe. The court held the FDA to its own documented standards. That is not extremism. That is administrative law.

But sure. Tell your constituents it is a nationwide abortion ban. His dog's trying to teach him new tricks and getting nowhere.

Now. Let me go through the highlight reel.

@PattyMurray and @SenatorHassan and @RepGregStanton. Oh boy. Sen. Murray wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Sen. Hassan wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Rep. Stanton wrote -- I want you to read this carefully -- "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand."

WORD. FOR. WORD.

Three separate officials. Three separate states. One brain between them and they are sharing it on a rotating schedule. Isn't it dangerous to use your whole vocabulary in one sentence? Because apparently they only have the one.

@SenWarren decided that "a conservative court packed with Trump-appointed judges" was the headline -- except, Senator, one of the three judges on that panel is a George W. Bush appointee. That is a fact available to anyone who spent thirty seconds on the first page of the ruling. You did not spend thirty seconds. You spent zero seconds. And then reported to your constituents anyway. Running on dial-up in a fiber-optic world and mad at the court for having internet.

@RonWyden called it "a nationwide abortion ban." Full stop. Thirty years in the Senate. The man has been in that chamber since 1996. He has seen more legislation than most people have had hot meals. And his contribution to this moment is a tweet calling a mailing rule stay "a nationwide abortion ban." Thirty years of accumulated nothing. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and poop out a more accurate legal summary than that.

@repdeliaramirez called for making "#RoeVWade the law of the land." In response to an Administrative Procedure Act ruling about an FDA mailing regulation. These are DIFFERENT CASES. Different courts. Different legal questions. Different decades. She does not even know what she is commenting on. More confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles and still found a way to get 2,000 retweets on it.

@RepBeccaB actually said -- and I quote -- "Whether it's taken at home or in a medical setting has no impact on that fact." No impact. The FDA's own label reports 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record explicitly states mailing without oversight INCREASES those risks. The setting has a documented, quantified, FDA-certified IMPACT on patient safety outcomes. She told her constituents the exact opposite of what the FDA's own documentation states. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a lie with a congressional letterhead.

@SenMarkey said "blocking access to it isn't about safety -- it's about control." Senator. The court's ENTIRE analysis -- all 18 pages -- was about safety. Specifically the FDA's own admission that it never adequately studied the mailing safety. The court cited the FDA's documented safety failures. You told Massachusetts the court ruling about safety is not about safety. I genuinely do not know what your problem is, but I am guessing it is hard to pronounce.

@TeamPelosi -- the former Speaker of the House of Representatives -- said Republicans "don't like birth control." Mifepristone is not a birth control medication. Birth control PREVENTS pregnancy. Mifepristone terminates an EXISTING pregnancy. These are pharmacologically and legally distinct categories that a Speaker of the House should be able to distinguish. The pilgarlic performance from someone who once wielded the Speaker's gavel is genuinely something to behold.

@amyklobuchar -- to be fair -- was the ONLY one who got close to accurate. She said "by mail" instead of inventing a ban. She gets half a point for basic literacy. The bar is subterranean and she barely cleared it but she cleared it. You bring everyone so much joy, Senator. You know, when you leave the room. But still.

@CAgovernor Gavin Newsom joined the party. Not a member of Congress -- a governor. But same talking points, same memo, same lies. Newsom is the same guy who apparently once said Governor Greg Abbott "doesn't have the backbone." Governor Abbott, for anyone who does not know, is paralyzed from the waist down due to a severed spine from a 1984 accident. Newsom has more nerve than spine, which is apparently the qualification for running California into the ground.

Here is the thing that keeps me up at night. Not the politics. The PATTERN.

If a CITIZEN lies to a member of Congress, that is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Up to FIVE YEARS in federal prison. Substantial fines. That is what happens when YOU lie to THEM.

If a member of Congress lies to 335 MILLION citizens?

That is just a Friday.

And that Friday apparently comes with a DNC memo and a coordinated social media rollout and zero accountability whatsoever.

Trying to reason with some of these folks is like trying to baptize a cat. But I am going to keep doing it anyway -- because SOMEBODY has to drag these lies into the light, and I have tenure, a science background, and nothing but time.

@RepPressley @SenWarren @RoKhanna @PattyMurray @RonWyden @SenatorCantwell @SenatorHassan @RepJohnLarson @RepBeccaB @RepDelBene @RepGregStanton @amyklobuchar @repdeliaramirez @SenMarkey @SenatorHick @TeamPelosi @CAgovernor

You are all on record. Every lie. Every talking point. Every copy-pasted word.

And I am just getting started.

America was founded by geniuses. These people are proof the trend did not hold.

But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who read the 18-page ruling, can define arbitrary and capricious agency action, knows the difference between a mailing rule and an abortion ban, and understands that when fifteen elected officials post the SAME WORDS on the SAME DAY about a ruling NONE OF THEM CITED -- that is not democracy. That is a poltroon parade dressed up as representation.

IF THIS MADE YOU THINK: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this -- every single share matters. There is someone on your timeline right now being lied to by one of these names. COMMENT "YES" below if you want me to keep calling them out by name. One by one. With receipts. Because I have all of them.

JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. Subscribe to my account -- about the cost of a cup of coffee a month. Your support keeps this classroom open. And I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself.

@JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

Let me add one more thing. And yes, I am going to repeat it. Because it is THAT important and some things deserve to be said twice.

Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent."

Read that again.

Every. Single. Time.

These fifteen officials told you they are fighting FOR women. They told you they are protecting women's health. They told you this ruling puts women's lives at risk.

But here is what they did not tell you -- because not one of them read the ruling.

The FDA's OWN safety label states that 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record -- the 18 pages none of them opened -- explicitly documents that mailing the drug WITHOUT in-person medical oversight INCREASES those emergency care risks. Louisiana showed $92,000 in Medicaid costs from real women who ended up in real emergency rooms from mifepristone complications in 2025 alone. Nearly 1,000 cases per month.

The court reinstated in-person oversight BECAUSE women were being harmed.

Let that land.

The ruling these members of Congress are calling an "attack on women" was issued BECAUSE women were getting hurt WITHOUT proper medical supervision. The in-person requirement they are screaming about EXISTS to make sure a doctor is present when complications occur. Reinstating it is not a war on women. It is a basic medical safety standard that these officials -- in their coordinated, memo-driven, copy-pasted outrage -- are actively fighting to REMOVE.

Quinn's Law Number One. They say they are protecting women. Their position, if it succeeded, would result in MORE women in emergency rooms with NO doctor present. The exact opposite of their stated intent. Every single time. Without exception. You could set a watch by it.

I want to say that one more time for the people in the back who are still reading the talking points memo instead of the court document.

THEY. ARE. FIGHTING. TO. REMOVE. MEDICAL. OVERSIGHT.

FOR WOMEN.

While telling you they are protecting women.

And here is the part that should stop you cold. Not one -- NOT ONE -- of the fifteen names I tagged in this post can tell you what a woman IS. Their party spent years insisting that only a biologist can define a woman. Well. I am a science teacher. I will do it for free.

A woman is an adult human female -- the sex of an organism that produces large gametes, organized around ovarian development and the reproductive anatomy that supports gestation. That definition comes from developmental biology, evolutionary biology, endocrinology, and medicine. It is in the textbooks. It is not controversial in any field that studies living organisms.

But ask @SenWarren. Ask @PattyMurray. Ask @RoKhanna. Ask @repdeliaramirez -- who cannot even identify which court case she is commenting on, let alone which biological category she is defending.

They cannot define a woman.

They cannot tell you what a woman is.

But they are absolutely certain -- CERTAIN -- that they know what is best for women's bodies, women's healthcare, and women's lives.

And they know it so thoroughly, so completely, so confidently, that they do not need to read the ruling. They do not need to check the FDA's own safety data. They do not need to acknowledge the real women in Louisiana emergency rooms. They do not need to define their terms. They just need the memo. Paste it in. Hit send. Collect the fundraising email donations that go out twenty minutes later.

That is not advocacy. That is not protection. That is not fighting for anyone.

That is using women as a political prop by people who cannot even name what a woman is -- while simultaneously fighting to strip away the medical supervision that exists specifically to keep women safe.

Quinn's Law Number One. The exact opposite. Every time.

I am a science teacher. I have spent my career explaining how the natural world actually works rather than how people wish it worked. Reality does not care about your talking points. Biology does not care about your memo. And the women in those Louisiana emergency rooms do not care about your fundraising email.

The truth is the truth whether or not fifteen members of Congress choose to read it.

But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who can define a woman, read a court brief, interpret FDA safety data, and identify when the people claiming to protect someone are actively making the situation more dangerous for that someone. Apparently a rare combination on Capitol Hill.

Comment YES below if you want me to keep going. Because I have more names, more lies, and more receipts than they have talking points.

@JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Thank you, @RepJeffries, for doubling down on stupid. Truly. I did not think it was physically possible to say less with more words, but here you are -- a man of relentless achievement.

I want to be clear about something before I continue: I do not fully blame you for this post. I mean that. You are not the architect here. You are the instrument. The Democratic machine needed a high-visibility face to walk out and read the approved statement with conviction, and you were the one they pointed at. You are the windsock. The party provides the wind. You just face whichever direction they need you to face today. It is not personal. It is just your function. The blatherskite on the marquee while the real decisions happen somewhere you probably are not invited.

But since your name is on the statement, your name gets the response. So. Let us go.

"CORRUPT SUPREME COURT DECISION."

A 6-3 decision applying the 14th Amendment -- the one Republicans passed in 1868 over Democratic opposition, while your party was busy arguing that Black Americans were property -- is now "corrupt." Because it went a way you did not prefer. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen so you can say things like that out loud. It is owed an apology. A formal, written apology. Possibly flowers.

The Court in Louisiana v. Callais applied a precedent established in Shaw v. Reno in 1993. Thirty-two years old. Nobody repealed it. The ruling says you cannot make race the PREDOMINANT factor in drawing a district without meeting strict scrutiny. The same Equal Protection standard applies to EVERYONE. Every voice. Equally. Which is, I believe, what your statement claims to want -- until it applies to everyone, at which point it becomes "corrupt."

The wheel is spinning but the hamster has absolutely left the building.

"THE UNFETTERED RIGHT TO VOTE."

Now, I want to pause on "unfettered." Because you are using that word to mean "without verification." And that is a remarkable position from a man who required photo ID for his own congressional town halls. I checked. It is documented. The same @RepJeffries who calls voter ID "voter suppression" at the podium was handing out lanyards only to people who could prove who they were at his own events. If brains were dynamite, that level of self-awareness couldn't blow its nose.

"REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS HAVE EMBRACED VOTER SUPPRESSION AND RACIAL GERRYMANDERING."

Let me tell you about the history of gerrymandering, Congressman, since your elevator appears to be stuck between floors on this particular topic.

The word "gerrymander" was coined in 1812. Named after Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts. A member of the Democratic-Republican Party -- Thomas Jefferson's party, your party's direct ancestor. He drew a state senate district so contorted to deny Federalists their seats that a Boston cartoonist said it looked like a salamander. Gerry plus salamander. Gerrymander. Two hundred and fourteen years later, your party allies in Virginia are attempting to redraw that state's congressional map from 6-to-5 to 10-to-1 in a state that votes roughly 50/50. Barack Obama filmed advertisements for it. Democrats outspent opponents on the referendum three to one.

You are the party that INVENTED it, is STILL DOING IT right now, in 2026, and is standing at a microphone calling the other side extremists for it.

That is not a logical fallacy. That is a personality trait. Quinn's Law Number Two, recited for the class: if you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing. Set. Your. Watch.

Now about your own voting record, since we are here.

You voted 29 times for a clean Continuing Resolution. Then on vote number 30, the IDENTICAL document became "a partisan bill gutting healthcare." You could not find the same position twice with a map and a flashlight. Your belt demonstrably does not go through all the loops on this one.

You voted to let ACA COVID subsidies expire. Twice. 2021. 2022. Zero Republican votes wrote those subsidies. Zero Republican votes set the expiration date. Democrats built the sunset clause and then blamed Republicans when the sun set. You know who does that? Someone who, in a battle of wits, arrives completely unarmed.

"THE EXTREMISTS NEED TO CHEAT TO WIN."

I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and cough up a more coherent statement than that. Let me ask the three-question test I give every politician making claims about legislation:

Which of the following is true about your statement today? One: you did not read the actual ruling and are simply performing the talking points your leadership handed you on the way to the microphone. Two: you read it but lack the legal comprehension to understand what the Equal Protection Clause has said since 1993. Or three: you understand it perfectly and are deliberately deceiving the people who sent you to Congress.

Pick one, Congressman. Those are the only doors. There is no fourth option.

"WE WILL NOT REST UNTIL THE JOHN R. LEWIS VOTING RIGHTS ADVANCEMENT ACT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND."

I want to address this specifically because invoking John Lewis's name while your party draws a 10-to-1 map in Virginia is the most spectacular species of audacity I have encountered outside of a parody account.

John Lewis marched for equal access to the ballot. Not for racial sorting. Not for the right of one party to pack voters by color into engineered districts that serve the party's electoral interests. He marched so that every American of every background could participate in a FAIR process. What your party is doing in Virginia is not honoring John Lewis. It is using his name as camouflage.

And while I have you: 76% of Black Americans support voter ID. Not 76% of conservatives. Not 76% of Republicans. BLACK AMERICANS. 80% of Hispanic Americans. 80% of white Americans. The Carter-Baker Commission -- bipartisan, Jimmy Carter himself commissioned it in 2005 -- listed voter ID as recommendation number ONE. When you say voter ID is voter suppression, you are telling 76% of Black Americans that their own opinion about protecting their own vote is wrong. That is not advocacy. That is condescension with a press release attached.

You are the human version of a 404 error on a question that had a clear answer thirty years ago.

Here is what you have NOT said a word about, for the record: Thirty-two murders across all five New York City boroughs in early 2026. Your constituent-adjacent body count. Zero posts. But a Supreme Court ruling that applies Equal Protection equally to everyone generates a formal press release within the hour. "All foam, no beer" does not begin to cover what I am watching.

One last thing, since I am a science teacher and I do like completeness.

You said "the era of voter suppression in America." You are standing in the party that filibustered the Civil Rights Act for 75 calendar days. You are standing in the party whose senator Robert Byrd -- KKK recruiter, 150-man chapter founder, "conscience of the Senate" as your colleagues called him -- led a 14-hour filibuster against it on the Senate floor. You are standing in the party that ran paramilitary organizations -- the Klan, the White League, the Red Shirts -- that lynched Black voters at polling places and burned Black Republican precincts to suppress votes for nearly a hundred years. Your party INVENTED the era you are claiming to be ending.

That is not a partisan attack. That is the Congressional Record.

I do not fully blame you, Congressman. I said that at the top and I meant it. You are a man of limited intellectual horsepower being asked to carry very heavy rhetorical freight. The machine chose you for this role. You serve the function the machine requires. The pilgarlic on the poster while the real architects stay off camera.

But since your name is on the statement, your name goes on the receipt too.

@JoJoFromJerz @TheYoungTurks @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman -- I just need you all to witness that @RepJeffries called racial Equal Protection enforcement "corruption" while his party is literally drawing a 10-to-1 map in Virginia this week. Donating his brain to science before he was done with it.

IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.

SHARE this. COMMENT below -- which part of @RepJeffries' statement was the most weapons-grade stupid? The "corruption" claim, the gerrymandering accusation from the party that invented gerrymandering, or the voter ID rhetoric that 76% of Black Americans disagree with? Tell me.

And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.

But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who apparently spent more time reading Louisiana v. Callais, the 14th Amendment, and @RepJeffries' own voting record than @RepJeffries did before issuing a statement calling the Constitution corrupt.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/IfA7A5PYCc

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/WUNtUI4qVL

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

The original District of Columbia was a perfect square.

Then they gave Virginia’s half back… partly to keep the slave markets running.

Should we restore the Founders’ map?

Rep. McCormick just dropped the “Make DC Square Again Act”

This is bigger than DC. This is about fixing a broken system.

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

SCOOP

In an unearthed video, Senator Cornyn’s team forgot to delete a video from YouTube

where Cornyn advocates for amnesty for illegal aliens.

It would be a shame if every Republican in Texas sees this before the May 26th runoff.

No amnesty!

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

They didn’t just monitor “hate.” They allegedly paid the KKK and American Nazis over $3 MILLION to keep the fire burning.

Now the SPLC faces 11 federal counts.

From the 1812 Gerrymander to Virginia’s 10-1 power grab in 2026 — same party, same playbook.

Read the full breakdown 👇

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/fr9Or6L0ca

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Sneak peek – Battlefield America, Chapter 2

PA certified 121k more votes than voters (margin: 80k). MI: 271k extra votes + back-door ballots at 3:30am. AZ: 420k failed signatures, deleted audit files.

FBI affidavits. Sworn testimony. Time Mag bragged about the shadow campaign.

If it was clean, why hide the ballots?

From a retired Army combat medic. Commit below for the full book.

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/5laTjZ5HmQ

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Left: ‘Republicans invented gerrymandering!’

Reality: Named after Elbridge Gerry (Democratic-Republican [Pre-Dem Party], 1812).

Used to suppress Black Republicans after Reconstruction.

Still happening in MD, IL, NY, VA right now.

Time for a real lesson →

[Scott Cav @ScottEmmart]

@godby_richard @Chicago1Ray

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

How about you start by picking a lane.

You cannot call something BOTH "illegal" AND a "war" in the same sentence and expect anyone with a functioning cerebral cortex to nod along. Here is why.

A formal declaration of WAR is a Congressional act. Article I, Section 8. YOURS. The President is Commander in Chief under Article II and has the authority to conduct military operations against active threats -- which is exactly what every president since Truman has done. Korea. Vietnam. Grenada. Panama. Kosovo. Libya. Syria. None of them declared wars. Were those all "illegal" too? I do not remember @SenateDems screaming about Obama's unauthorized bombing campaigns in seven countries.

If you GENUINELY believed this was a war, you had the constitutional mechanism to stop it. It is called the War Powers Resolution. You could have forced a vote. You did not -- because you knew you did not have the votes, and because calling it an "illegal war" polls better for fundraising than actually doing your constitutional job.

So let us be precise. It is not a "war" -- Congress never declared one. You know this. And because Congress never declared one, the President is operating well within his Article II authority as Commander in Chief. The word "illegal" is therefore a feeling, not a legal argument.

Quinn's Law #23: liberals love the law until they disagree with it. Then they just ignore it.

Quinn's Law #22: liberals love democracy until it does not go their way.

Operation Epic Fury eliminated the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism -- a regime that has been killing Americans since 1979, that funded the weapons used against our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that was actively pursuing nuclear capability. You want to call THAT the problem?

Here is a REAL problem you might address: approximately 50,000 combat-wounded veterans, medically retired before 20 years because their bodies were BROKEN in service, are STILL having their earned retirement pay offset by the government. The Major Richard Star Act -- S.Amdt.4056 -- fixes this for roughly $975 million per year. You cannot find the votes. But you found the microphone to call a completed military operation against a terrorist regime "illegal."

Priorities are revealing things.

But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who actually read Article I AND Article II of the Constitution, which apparently puts me ahead of the entire @SenateDems communications team.

IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this
COMMENT below -- name ONE Democrat-led military action since 1950 that had a formal declaration of war. I genuinely want to see the list.

And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Genuine question for the American voter:

If @IlhanMN accidentally forgot to mention $29,905,000 on her financial disclosure -- a rounding error, she says -- should she be allowed to vote on how YOUR tax dollars are spent?

Let that sink in for a second. Please share your thoughts below. 👇

$30 million in wealth. Gone. Just... a typo. My students lose points for rounding errors. She gets a seat on the House Budget Committee.

You know what I cannot do? File my taxes wrong by $29,905,000 and call it an "accounting mistake." The IRS does not do that. Neither does the court system. I also cannot overstate my net worth on a loan application to buy a house -- they actually prosecuted a former president of the United States for allegedly doing exactly that.

So I have to ask: if Donald Trump was dragged into a Manhattan courtroom over inflated asset valuations, why is @IlhanMN sitting comfortably in Congress after a $29,905,000 "oops" on her federal disclosure?

Can anyone answer this??? I am looking for it below 👇

One standard for thee, and a completely different standard for the people who write the laws. But apparently Congress has a COMPLETELY different standard for its members -- especially when those members represent the epicenter of what federal prosecutors called "STAGGERING, INDUSTRIAL-SCALE" fraud in Minnesota.

But sure. Let her vote on YOUR money. Because Quinn's Law #6 is iron-clad: facts are the enemy of liberalism.

And just so we are clear -- while @IlhanMN cannot seem to keep track of her own net worth, she apparently CAN keep track of how to vote NO every time someone tries to stop the government from STEALING the retirement of combat-wounded veterans. The Major Richard Star Act would cost roughly $975 million per year. That is less than the $9 BILLION that was stolen in her own backyard. Funny how that math works.

But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who actually knows what a budget is.

IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this.
COMMENT below -- should a $30 million "rounding error" disqualify you from voting on the national budget? Tell me.

JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

https://t.co/Vby8gdxwKL