@moninvestor Jensen is lying, of course. This is the same move all these market-manipulating CEO goblins make. He stands to make the most out of this claim
@tokenmuncherr@brevolve@DiscussingFilm No one said sound will kill movies, dummy. Maybe a few actors who didn't want to speak/sing said that, but that wasn't the broad sentiment
@jackpo773@PBarbicane@cremieuxrecueil @finleyistan "bad data" is the OP intentionally using data that only goes up to 2024, before data center capex went vertical in 2025 (57% increase).
He's also focusing on a single case in ND where output already exceeded demand, so the usage was absorbed. This isn't the case for most states.
@finleyistan @cremieuxrecueil It doesn't. He's using data that only goes up to 2024, before data center capex increased by 57% in 2025.
His claim is based on a single data point where North Dakota had extra capacity to offset increased usage. This isn't true for most states.
Tl;dr he's lying.
@AlfredAlfer77@cremieuxrecueil You love Data Centers in 2024, before the capex went vertical in 2025.
OP's graphs present a false reality that relies on demand being absorbed without building new infrastructure (which is not happening).
Tl;dr he's lying
@cremieuxrecueil Even AI doesn't agree with this intentionally manipulative bullshit lol (just ask!)
Cutting data off in 2024 right before DC capex went vertical in 2025 is a disingenuous clown move designed to fool morons.
No one with a brain should take the OP seriously.