Sean Adams

I'm the sum of my experiences.

[Hillel Fuld @HilzFuld]

This is wildly spectacular! Must watch this! Trust me, stop what you’re doing and watch this!

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

Biden's pardon of Fauci is unconstitutionally vague, covers 10 years of potential crimes, and was signed by autopen without Biden's direct authorization. You can't pardon someone for crimes never specified. This should be challenged in court.

https://t.co/ufMIdJYLr9

[Hosna ⚖️ בניטה @DOGEQEEN]

🚨 BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: Rep. Maxine Waters, on a $175K yearly salary, lives in a $4.6M mansion, has an estimated $5.3M net worth, made multi-year campaign payments of over $1M to her daughter. American citizens are now demanding a full bank account audit.

[Thaïs d’Escufon @ThaisEscufon]

Europeans and American patriots!

Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.”

Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large.

I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted.

They cannot silence the truth!

Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷

[David Peter דוד פטר @ptr_dvd]

אין לי ברירה אלא לחזור שוב ושוב:
נתניהו יצר במו ידיו שעת כושר היסטורית נדירה שבה ישראל עשתה למשך זמן קצוב ככל העולה על רוחה בארכי-אויב עם שטח פי 75 ואוכלוסייה פי 10.
יש אנשים שזה פתח להם את התיאבון והם איבדו שליטה ויש אנשים שמסרבים להכיר בהישג מטעמים פוליטיים.
אבל חשוב לחשוב ולשנן:
מתקני הגרעין הושמדו.
הצמרת המדינית, הביטחונית, המודיעינית, הצבאית והמדעית - נערפה כולה.
מערכות ההגנה האווירית, מפעלי ייצור קריטיים לתעשייה הצבאית, מתקנים מסווגים רבים - הותקפו וקיבלו מכה קשה.
את כל זה נתניהו הוביל כמעט לבדו לאחר שנים של היערכות פוליטית, תודעתית, כלכלית, צבאית ומודיעינית.
ישראל יצרה משוואה אזורית שאיש לא דמיין שתהיה אפשרית לפיה יש לנו, בפועל, חופש פעולה מבצעי (אם רק נרצה) בטהרן, ובידול מלא של הזירות עם חופש פעולה מבצעי בפועל בכל הגזרות.
אנחנו מחזיקים ב-60% משטח הרצועה, מחזיקים מעבר לליטאני, מחזיקים שטחים נרחבים בגבול הסורי, הצבא הסורי הושמד, הממשלה החות'ית נמחקה וחיזבאללה חלש מאי פעם.
כל זה קרה, כאמור, תחת צילה של המעצמה השיעית שהיא פי 75 בשטחה ופי 10 באוכלוסייה ביחס לישראל.
עכשיו באים הפובליציסטים מטעם עצמם ומלינים:
- למה אין "ניצחון מוחלט" על מעצמה שיעית (פי 75 ופי 10)? טוב בסדר.
- למה אין "הסכם מדיני"? כאילו שאסטרטגיה שתלויה ברצון הצד השני (במקרה הזה שיעי פנאטי) רלוונטית בכלל במדינאות.
- למה אנחנו בתחושה של סבבים? כאשר לאחר כתישת דרום לבנון הפצצה בלב איראן כל מה שיש לאיראנים לתת זה כמה טילים שמיורטים. אנחנו פשוט לא שמים לב כמה הם מסורסים ללא האיום הגרעיני וללא חיזבאללה.
- למה יש רחפנים בצפון? עם כל הכאב והצער על כל נפגע שהוא עולם ומלואו, צריך לזכור שמדובר בצבא אימתני שהיה על הגדר שלנו וכעת כל דרום לבנון נכבש והושמד והוא מסוגל רק לזנב בנו. כן, זה כואב, אבל אנחנו במלחמה. ביחס לאלטרנטיבה של עשרות אלפי הרוגים בישראל, אלפי טילים מדוייקים ופלישה קרקעית של אלפי לוחמים שיעים מנוסים מאוד וכיבוש מלא של צפון הארץ בידי האויב, נדמה לי שמצבנו מצוין. הרחפנים הם איום חדש (וזול) שהולך להציף ולשנות את פני המערכה בכל העולם (וגם ביו"ש). צריך להתאים את הצבא לאיום בטווחים שניתן לעבוד בהם בצפון לפני שזה יגיע לכפר סבא. אכן זו התמודדות, זה מה יש.
בשורה התחתונה תוכנית קאסם סולימאני להשמדת מדינת ישראל כמעט וצלחה. לא מספיק מבינים את זה, אבל זו האמת.
העם היושב בציון ניצל,
וניצח ניצחון גדול.
זה לא אומר שצריך לשגות באשליות לגבי יכולותיה של ישראל תחת האילוצים הנתונים בנקודת הזמן הזו.
אגב בהחלט ייתכן בעיני שנבחרי ציבורי מסוימים עשו טעויות בבניית הציפיות ביחס למלחמה.
אבל מדינאות ברמה הגבוהה לא צריכה, כמובן, להתרגש מהדבר הזה והיא צריכה להתמקד במה שנכון לעשות.
---
היות שבעיני התקשורת והשמאל, הבחירות חשובות יותר מאמירת האמת חשוב לחזור ולומר את האמת שוב ושוב כדי שלא תישכח.
המלחמה הזו תיחקק כמלחמה השלישית לאחר תש"ח וששת הימים, כלומר כמלחמה שביססה את המפעל הציוני בארץ ישראל קדימה במבט היסטורי.
ולסיום, אמת נוספת שמשום מה רבים יודעים אבל חוששים לומר בבירור:
למיטב שיפוטי איש מלבד נתניהו לא היה מסוגל להוציא את המדינה מהקבר שבו היינו ב-7.10.
נקודה.
בעיני עצם העובדה שאנשים כמו אייזנקוט או בנט מתבוננים במראה וסבורים שהם מתאימים, כשירים ומסוגלים לשבת בכסא רה"מ היא היא ההוכחה שאין להם ולו את היכולת לדעת את עצמם.

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

Even Arab leaders admit it.

Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.

Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.

Ok, so let us set that aside.

Now watch this.

In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.

Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.

He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.

The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.

This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.

When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.

The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.

This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.

If you value the truth, please share.

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

WHAT WE GIVE ISRAEL

The standard US military aid package is $3.8 billion per year $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing plus $500 million for joint missile defense programs. Israel must spend most of this on US-made products and services, and by 2028 essentially all of it must be spent in America.

WHAT ISRAEL GIVES BACK

1. F-35 R&D Savings: 55 billion
Israel resolved multiple technical issues during the F-35’s early development, reducing US R&D costs by an estimated $55 billion and accelerating deployment timelines.  The total F-35 program cost was $55 billion in R&D Israel’s combat testing effectively saved the US from having to discover and fix those problems on their own dime.

2. Intelligence Value: equivalent to 5 CIAs (75 billion/year)

General George Keegan, former Chief of US Air Force Intelligence, stated that Israel’s intel value equals “5 CIAs” providing a 400% return on investment on the $3.8 billion aid package. One CIA budget runs approximately $15 billion.  Five times that equals roughly $75 billion worth of intelligence annually for $3.8 billion in aid.

3. Strategic Base Value: $15–20 billion/year

As stated by Admiral Elmo Zumwalt and General Alexander Haig, Israel is the largest US aircraft carrier that does not require US military personnel on board, cannot be sunk, and is deployed in a critical region sparing the US the need to manufacture, deploy, and maintain real aircraft carriers with ground divisions, which would cost the US $15–20 billion annually. 

4. F-35 Export Multiplier: $40 billion in sales, $173 billion backlog
Israel’s battle-tested performance and upgrades to the F-35 contribute to $40 billion in US exports and a $173 billion backlog for US industry.  Israel essentially serves as the world’s most credible advertisement for American weapons.

5. Jobs and Economic Output: 255,000 jobs, $72 billion annually
The F-35 economic engine alone supports 290,000 US employees and $72 billion in annual economic output.  Israeli stakeholders hold contracts with over 1,000 American companies across 48 states, DC, and Puerto Rico.

Why do people need to lie about this?

Because they have nefarious reasons.

There’s no other reason to lie about this stuff.

[נתן סלומון @slwmwn49386]

סרט הפילם נואר הקלאסי ״השיטה״ הבלש שחושף את שלטון הצללים האפל

[Sean Adams @SeanAdams72]

Feature idea for Tesla: Create a dedicated Valet Key Fob that stays in the car permanently. Make it always in Valet mode and require PIN-to-Drive. That way I never have to hand over my phone or main key to valets, and if someone breaks in they still can't drive it without the code. @elonmusk what do you think? #Tesla

[John Reese - Person of Interest @Rickisback_ON_X]

I don't mean to be a downer, but I think this year (2026) could be our last chance to save the once beautiful State of California and City Of Los Angeles. The State of my birth and home for the past 65 years (minus deployments).

Please vote:

Steve Hilton - Governor, State of California
Spenser Pratt - Mayor, City of Los Angeles
Michael Gates Jr - Attorney General, State of California

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

Marco Rubio:

"Hitler soñaba con un mundo sin judíos, una idea que comparte con Hamás.

Hoy, estos regímenes e imperios se han convertido en polvo, pero Israel sigue en pie y el pueblo judío prospera.

Rezo por un día en el que el mundo entero reconozca la inutilidad del antisemitismo.

Un mundo en el cual los líderes abandonen el odio autodestructivo y creen un nuevo futuro en asociación con Israel basándose en los Pactos Abrahámicos."

[Jeff pontz @827js]

A Seattle judge said
we couldn't show the faces of
the 33 Antifa & anti-Israel radicals
who caused over $1 million in damage
to the brand new engineering building at UW in May.

So here are their faces & names:

Tayler Hart
Max Rulff
Zachary Wallaced-Wells
Jade Wu,
Jessica Schutz
Luisa Ortega Subdiaz
Ginger Newberry
Kimaya Mahajan
Gina Liu
Lea Keating
Akira Junyaprusert
Anna Hattle
Julia Fraczek
Cade Jackson
Jonas Piper
Ty Park
Lucy Zern
Tasbeet Iman
Ricardo Colon-Galvez
Roberta Collison
Ella Tunduwani
Zainab Chattha
Riley Centerwall
Catherine Brown
Brett Anton
Claire Berger
Yasmin Ahmed
Yafate Yared
Geneveve Konijisky
Finn Brown
Bailey Keen
Lucas Nichols-Mcauslan and Sam Sueoka.

It was all a matter of public record
long before the judge made the ruling.
KOMO News made this handy collage.
Please share

[טלי גוטליב @TallyGotliv]

בוחרי ליכוד יקרים. גם אני כמוכם מאוכזבת מכניעת ישראל כץ לתכתיב של מיארה. פיספוס אדיר למשילות ימנית ולהזדמנות לדרוש ממנה את חקירת ההדלפה לערוץ 12 על התקיפה באיראן, ההדלפות לרונן ברגמן ואי העמדה לדין של הפצרי״ת. אותי כידוע לא מפחידים.
אתם חובתכם לדאוג לרשימת ליכוד ימנית ואמיצה. לא רק שלא יסכלו אותי, אני סומכת על תבונתכם ומאמצכם לחזק אותי ולהוביל אותי לצמרת רשימת הליכוד לצערה הרב של מיארה וחבריה.
והכל בעזרת ה׳ כמובן.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

Sold as a 13-year-old child bride in Iran, she was raped and tortured by her Muslim husband. Now safe in America, she devotes her life to warning the West about Islam.
Share this story widely.

[Tom Kratman @TKratman]

From Martin Iles, reposted:

Having lived in the USA for nearly two years, I've realised something.

The USA and the remainder of the Western world are no longer aligned.

We all laugh and mock when the Americans say, "Freedom!" because we truly think we're as free as they are.

Wrong. We're not. Not even close. The laws, the mindset, and the behaviour, is totally different in this regard.

Most of all, the governments are totally different. The USA's convictions around core freedoms are on a scale we do not share.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump wins the popular vote, the electoral college, the House, and the Senate... a man who, in every other Western country, is held in open derision, if not contempt.

For these and other reasons, we are not the same.

Yet the West, including Australia, fully expect to rely on the USA for our very survival.

If the world turns bad (which will happen - only a question of time), then the whole West, without America, is toast.

So, you may ask - if we're not very aligned ideologically, then it must be that we bring something to the party militarily?

Well, no... actually... we don't matter that much militarily.

The USA has about 470 ships in its navy, including 11 aircraft carriers, 69 submarines, 75 destroyers... plus 110 new ships in the pipeline.

Australia has about 30, including 3 destroyers, 7 frigates and 7 outdated submarines. The UK does a little better, with about 60.

Meanwhile, the US has over 14,000 military aircraft. A staggering number.

Australia has 252 military aircraft. The UK has 556.

The US army has just shy of 1,000,000 uniformed personnel in its military. Australia has about 45,000.
The USA spends 3.4% ($968 billion) of its GDP on defence. Australia spends 2% ($36.4 billion). The US spends as much as the next 15 largest military-spending countries (including China) combined.

The USA has a fighting culture. The men shoot things (a lot) and hunt things, the veterans get favoured in everything from parking spots to boarding planes. A uniformed young man is thanked in the street a dozen times a day.

"Oh, the Americans and their guns!" we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs.

How many young British men are willing to fight for their country? Now ask the same regarding young American men. The difference is about as wide as it could be.

Militarily, we don't offer squat.

Meanwhile, look at the way Australia works against America's interests by loving on China. China made us rich and we stay close. This is a Marxist regime with expansionist aims.

Again, you have to spend time in the USA to realise just how vast a gulf there is between us on China.

Europe, too. They let China have their way everywhere from Germany to Greenland, all the while importing Islam and sending their own people to court for saying hurty words.

Somehow, we have landed the deal of a lifetime with the USA that says, "when the baddies come, you'll save us ok?" Because we can't save ourselves.

And we live in peace. But we keep gnawing away at freedoms, keep enabling China, and get flabby and disinterested about our military because Uncle Sam's got it.

And, let's be honest, Americans are widely looked down on. To add insult to injury, we don't think that highly of our protectors.

So, the USA is finally saying "enough." I am here, I can tell you what the vibe is, and that's it. Trump is doing what people want in this regard. They're over it.

And we come across all shocked and hard done by. We behave like people with no self-insight at all.

Yes, the global alliance system is all over the place now. From America's perspective, it's about time.

And I must say, though I be a proud Australian, I am forced to agree. Something has to change.

[Sean Adams @SeanAdams72]

Funny how you refer to the funds reduction as an automatic negative issue.
Not that I know but what if they didn't need to get this money to begin with or even worst what if this money went missing like billions did in CA pandemic money.
Just maybe the reduction was the right thing to do?

[Sean Adams @SeanAdams72]

@GAZAWOOD1 @BillAckman Perfect explanation for a complicated situation of a simple problem. It's only missing the WHY are the media, the journalists, the academia, etc. so eager to push the Arabs narrative?

[GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga @GAZAWOOD1]

Following reactions to @BillAckman’s post on famine and BILD’s exposé on staged hunger in Gaza, it seems that what’s obvious to those familiar with the facts is far from clear to others.

The question remains:
Is there famine in Gaza?
And is it staged?

Any definitive “yes” or “no” without the concise clarification below would be inaccurate.

Let’s be clear:
In most of Gaza’s poor and displaced areas, people receive food and meals on a daily basis in an organized manner—and often get plenty of gifts, snacks, and extras. When they arrive at the food distribution point, they receive their meals in an orderly, calm process. (You’ve probably never seen the tens of thousands of videos from NGOs distributing food peacefully, with everyone smiling, full, and satisfied—simply because that’s not the narrative the mainstream media wants you to see.)

Is that famine?
No. It’s hardship, inconvenience—it’s less comfortable than opening your fridge at home. But it’s not famine, and that is, in fact, the reality in most of Gaza. This is what a war zone looks like—especially on the losing side, which in this case also started the war.
(They were displaced because Hamas used their residential areas as terror bases, and because most of the civilians elected Hamas—a terrorist organization whose official founding charter openly calls for the destruction of Israel—as their representatives. A minor detail, of course.)

In addition, there are slightly more organized areas—about 30% of Gaza—that have not been damaged or have been only partially damaged, where you can find fully functioning shops, markets, restaurants, and even malls. Sometimes they close briefly due to temporary shortages or evacuation orders.

Then there is Hamas itself, which has stockpiled enormous amounts of food for its own fighters and leadership for the long term, with the aim of surviving and profiting by selling it to civilians at exorbitant prices through its agents.

And beyond that, there is a tiny percentage of people who truly suffer—remote and poorer areas that may occasionally miss a meal, or even two.

Now to the question of staging—are the scenes staged?

When we say a scene is “staged,” we don’t mean children finished breakfast, left a villa in expensive clothes, drove in a limousine, arrived at a studio, changed into ragged clothes, and started filming themselves screaming and crying.

We mean something entirely different:
When food is being distributed at distribution points, Gazan journalists are there waiting. (When we say “Gazan journalists,” note that almost all are affiliated with Hamas—some actively, others as supporters.)

These journalists essentially direct “the scene.” They instruct certain children on how to behave, how to present themselves, when to cry, etc. All the videos you’ve seen of children screaming with empty pots actually come from this exact form of staging. Without the journalists and cameras, the children would simply be standing in line calmly, happy and full, waiting for their food.

So, to be clear:
Are we talking about well-fed children, swapping identities from kids living in comfort to ones pretending to be starving?
No.
Are we talking about children who have daily access to food and water in a distribution area, but when journalists arrive they are asked to act as if the situation is dire and they truly lack food and water? Yes.

The same applies to many scenes of IDF strikes. There’s a recurring pattern that collapses under a bit of thought (and that’s the point—Hamas counts on the overwhelming power of visuals over the much rarer habit of thinking): we see footage of a missile hitting a building; hours later, videos of injured and dead being pulled from the rubble, with women wailing in the background. In many documented cases, if Gazan cameramen know a missile is about to hit and position themselves perfectly to capture it, that usually means the people in the building also know it’s coming—and evacuate. This too, in many cases, is what we call staging. It doesn’t mean a missile didn’t fall. It doesn’t mean there’s no war.

It also doesn’t mean no one dies. But there is a lot—an awful lot—of manipulation involved: distorted casualty numbers, presenting terrorists as civilians, partial or complete staging, and more. That’s a separate and even more sensitive subject.

Hamas long ago declared that its main weapon against Israel is propaganda—not rockets, not tunnels, which are merely secondary tools—bait to drag Israel into the propaganda swamp it still doesn’t know how to navigate.
The reason is simple: they cannot defeat Israel on the battlefield.
The calculation should be straightforward:
Hamas is a terrorist organization + controls the media in Gaza + has openly declared its goal to erase Israel + is willing to die and sacrifice civilians for that goal + is religiously permitted (and in some interpretations obligated) to lie to achieve it (taqiyya – a doctrine in Islam allowing concealment or deception to protect oneself or advance a cause) + has been caught lying countless times + is boosted by the mainstream media’s rush to blame Israel = …?

With your permission, let’s climb just a little higher:
How is it possible that over nearly two years of alleged famine in Gaza, they’ve done everything to find children in real malnutrition—without success—and instead presented children with genetic disorders?

Why the need for so much propaganda and manipulation if you’re telling the truth?

Why steal so many photos of starving people from other countries—places like Yemen, Sudan, or Somalia?

Why are there hundreds of luxury restaurants operating in Gaza today?

How can there be thousands of food influencers in Gaza, still posting recipes and meals with abundant ingredients daily?

Why is it that in most videos we see, people appear healthy and well-fed, with clean, ironed clothes, trimmed hair, shaved beards, full of energy, filmed in high quality on modern iPhones—always charged, always with perfect reception—while in genuinely famine-stricken countries we see nothing even close to that?

Even children in truly famine-hit countries always have an apathetic, tired expression, and show no special interest in the camera.

The answer is simple: the famine they present is nothing of the sort. It’s far from it.

The fact that Gaza gets 100 times the global media spotlight compared to anywhere else, while other places suffer 1,000 times more with zero headlines, is hypocrisy—but more than that, it shows there’s a bigger game being played behind the scenes by powerful actors who want this narrative.

“Is there famine in Gaza?”
There is hardship in some areas, and abundance in others.

“Is the famine staged?”
Turning hardship into “famine” through exaggerated scenes, asking children to stand with empty pots for the camera, to scream and cry—that is absolutely staging.

This middle-ground reality is hard for the public to grasp—because it requires explanation, because people crave absolute good-vs-evil answers, and because it’s not viral.

This, I believe, is what Bill means when he says every claim should be examined thoroughly before being published. That’s what we would expect the mainstream media to do. And it’s the last thing the mainstream media will do—because what it cares about is chaos and outrage that will grab and inflame the public as much as possible (not to mention each journalist’s personal motives)

The fact that there are many places where suffering is 1,000 times worse than in Gaza, yet they interest no one and get zero coverage, is proof enough that those shouting “famine in Gaza!” have been manipulated and made victims of propaganda—whether the claim is true or not. And if you know you’re talking about Gaza because you’ve been subject to endless propaganda pushes, you should ask why they want to push it so aggressively, even at the expense of the truth—and whether you aren’t falling for a deliberate falsehood.

The massive use by Gaza’s civilians of high-end cameras, polished, youth-oriented viral video editing—all show they know exactly the job they’re supposed to do and what’s expected of them. This is unique to Gaza compared to any other crisis zone in the world, and it says a lot.

That’s why it’s both a right and a moral duty to think carefully about what interested parties want you to see—versus what is actually happening. By questioning narratives and seeking the full picture, you uphold the very principles that protect truth and morality.

https://t.co/WAoBzPj21n

[Sean Adams @SeanAdams72]

@Sarah4Trump_ Islam

[Sean Adams @SeanAdams72]

@KashPatelNewsX It's high time