Your entire epistemology is predicated on skipping over “physical evidences” for “spiritual evidence”. One of the fundamentals in following the prophet is he is “not limited by man’s reasoning” and doesn’t need any “earthly training”
This is intellectual childishness
@sangriaenjoyer It’s more accurate to say that that event is necessary but not sufficient. It doesn’t hinge only on that. It hinges on other things too.
@j_divis That’s a pretty poor excuse. I could link you hundreds of informative ones.
I wish you wisdom and sincere desire to learn, refraining from engaging in a discussion about your beliefs / poo-pooing the word debate is a big tell that you don’t take learning seriously.
@j_divis I invited you to a long form discussion, not interested in tweet forms / misreadings prolonged across hours / days. This is unserious.
You can’t issue the Crowder meme where he has one on one convos and then say you’re not into that.
I invite you to be able to have serious critical conversations about your beliefs.
Your invite to learn is functionally like a trans activist "inviting" others to "learn"
Alternatively, if your claims are unfounded, "learn" isn't the right verb
@RandomLDS I invite you to be able to have serious critical conversations about your beliefs.
Your invite to learn is functionally like a trans activist "inviting" others to "learn"
Alternatively, if your claims are unfounded, "learn" isn't the right verb