Been a while since I reintroduced myself.
I write about CFO craft under The Secret CFO pseudonym.
Initially, that pseudonym gave me the freedom to talk about the CFO world in a way I never could with my name and company attached... and I guess it just stuck.
- Path: Big 4 → FP&A → Controller → Corp Dev → CFO (+ a few detours since)
- Experience: 25 years in finance, more than half of those in CFO roles
- Scale: Last CFO role as Group CFO in a $4bn revenue business
- Specialism: Special situations. High leverage, complex balance sheets, operational turnarounds and refinancings
- Transactions: 20+ M&A deals, integrations, exits, and major transformations
- Industries: Mature, 'real-world' businesses. Manufacturing, agriculture, hospitality, CPG, retail. Thin margins, operational complexity, high stakes.
A couple of years ago, I stepped away from the CFO seat for what I thought would be a year or so break. I had 20 years’ worth of handwritten notebooks full of things I’d learned, mistakes I’d made, frameworks I’d built, and lessons I wished somebody had taught me earlier. So I started writing them up and sharing them through my email newsletter.
As Steve Jobs once said, “You can’t connect the dots looking forward. You can only connect them looking backwards.” The more I wrote up, the more I shared. The more I shared, the more my platform grew.
And along the way I discovered I really love codifying and then teaching this stuff. I’d always enjoyed developing people in the teams I built. But suddenly, I could do it, at scale, for people I had never even met.
I started getting unsolicited emails from people who had landed their first public-company CFO job, completed a PE exit, escaped a boardroom bear trap, or simply made a better capital decision helped by one of the Playbooks I have written.
It humbles me every time. And it's addictive...
I’ve now written more than 500,000 words about the craft of being a CFO. Some came straight from those old notebooks. Some emerged from trying to make sense of a career’s worth of experience. And plenty has come from what I continue to learn from the incredible finance leaders I talk to everyday.
So, that’s why I’m here...
To codify the craft of finance leadership. To challenge and improve the fundamental ideas. And to put that context into the hands of the humans and machines building the finance function of the next decade.
It's an honor, thanks for following along.
@Colin_Best@PEoperator Capacity release is much more exciting than cost savings with AI in my opinion. But we are getting to the point where quantifying it is becoming important.
I agree, it’s gotta have room to breathe.
But I also think now the enterprise spend on AI is sufficiently large in aggregate that it’s not unreasonable that folk are ready to see productivity materialize into a measurable on the P&L. And that that is pretty important for the whole AI (and therefore market) narrative
"I've been in rooms with too many finance people before. It's dangerous because the wrong things can end up dominating the conversation.
Most business problems are ultimately solved through better products, better marketing, and better sales.
Finance is a vehicle to help make that happen, not an end in itself."
-- wise words from @SecretCFO
[Two related ideas:
1) everyone, in particular those in finance, tends to over-emphasise things that are easy to measure (like marketing spend), and under-emphasise things that are hard or impossible to measure (like your brand value) which often leads to large errors
2) "The map is not the territory" -- what we see in finance on dashboards, in the P&L, is always an abstraction or representation of the business, not the business itself]
Reminds me of the guy that said he was going to open a dog training school called Harvard so all their MBAs would forever have to say “no… the one for humans”
Reminds me of the guy that said he was going to open a dog training school called Harvard so all their MBAs would forever have to say “no… the one for humans”
One of my favorite ongoing bits is "confusing" someone's elite alma mater with a lower ranked college
"How was Boston College" (Harvard)
"Would you recommend Penn State" (Penn)
"What was Rutgers like?" (Princeton)
@cjgustafson yes huge problem ... the cost of sending credible sounding superficial questions has gone to zero. Big problem for in house IR teams right now.
and it works both ways. I'm also sick of getting shitty AI generated updates from early stage investments I've made too.