A point has been reached where those of us who value truth, who value reason, who value material reality and who recognise that the very foundation of how we make sense of the world, the scientific method, is being undermined, take a stand. @SEENSTEM
The practice of “social transition” of gender-distressed children at school—sometimes without knowledge of parents—is exposed in a front-page report by @rachelbaxendale in The Australian today.
In an editorial, the newspaper also criticises this risky practice, which may have profound psychological consequences.
Links ($) below.
How trans activism created the transgender child:
First, early trans activists sanitized the language of the diagnosis to remove any mention of paraphilic desires or sexual deviancy.
Then depsychopathologization redefined being trans as innate, natural and healthy.
Now if trans is innate and healthy, there must be trans children.
Trans activists bombarded all of society—including children and adolescents—with this messaging and triggered a contagion of young people believing themselves to be trans.
Then those innocent young people were thrust to the forefront of the rights movement to reinforce the idea that trans is natural and healthy. Because if there are trans kids, then it can’t be a paraphilia.
The trouble is, none of that was based on science or evidence. It was all political maneuvering. And we now have legions of young people missing healthy body parts as a consequence.
@BlanchardPhD and I certainly didn’t always see eye to eye in this interview, and that’s why I enjoyed it so much. Truly one of my favourite interviews so far.
In the EU, we hardly ever speak of women anymore. Political parties—left, center, and also conservatives—have embraced gender self-ID without scrutiny or debate. Does this threaten women’s rights? Yes. And here I explain why.
Alice Sullivan, a leading gender-critical researcher, has been shortlisted for the 2025 Maddox Prize for her landmark review into how sex is recorded in publicly funded research. @jgro_the reports
https://t.co/s0r1YoGaSl
The @splcenter has abandoned its mission. Once a guardian against genuine extremism, it now manufactures division by branding legitimate discourse as 'hate.'
Their reckless mislabeling of organizations like Genspect doesn't just silence debate—it creates the very climate of hostility they claim to oppose. When you equate questioning with hatred, you escalate tensions rather than resolve them. When you paint targets on those who simply disagree, you become part of the problem you were founded to solve.
The SPLC knows the power of their platform. They know their words carry weight and shape public perception. Yet they persist in conflating dissent with danger, turning their hate list into a weapon against democratic discourse.
This ends now. Remove Genspect and every organization wrongfully branded from your list. Your credibility is already in ruins. Your conscience should compel you to act before more damage is done.
This is misleading in 2,ways:
1. Women can not change sex.
2. Only women produce breastmilk suitable for breastfeeding . Men produce milk secondary to galactorrhoea. It is iatrogenic: a side effect of medication and will not meet the nutritional needs of a baby.
‘Men who take large doses of hormones to stimulate ‘chestmilk’ secretions may produce around 30ml of liquid per day. This liquid is not breastmilk and is in no way nutritionally comparable, therefore the baby will need formula for its nutrition.
https://t.co/fNkSTWyIuq.
I'm pleased to announce that SEEN at KCL has launched today. We believe it is the first formal university staff network for gender-critical staff.
If you are at KCL and you want to sign up, there is a link to our sign-up form on this page: https://t.co/Pq6HhgVtcb
1/3
Researcher and detransitioner Soren Aldaco @sorenaldaco : “What's gonna hurt them most is being faced with the consequences of their actions, and of their disregard for the most basic duty of care that physicians have which is to do no harm.”
Puberty isn't optional—it's the foundation of healthy adulthood. A global movement is uniting to protect children from experimental interventions that disrupt natural development.
🛡 Join us at https://t.co/D929Ol7pDd
Breaking! @BritishWL restore fair weightlifting for females ✅
“To comply with the Equality Act 2010, BWL will only offer a female category which only includes women and girls whose biological sex is female. BWL will not permit the participation of males who identify as female”
These discriminatory remarks were made at a University of Westminster event on 'Queering Academia', Hosted by the Q+ Network and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Team.
https://t.co/VDQDXDNxDX
🇮🇪 Powerful letter in today’s Sunday Independent: “The Cass Review is not a political document. It’s a sobering account of how ideology replaced evidence in treating vulnerable children. In Ireland, we’re told to ignore the warning signs — again. Just like symphysiotomy.”
We have been told one of the panelists at @CIPD festival of work discussion on the Equality Act was saying HR teams needed to wait for guidance on the Supreme Court decision. That is poor advice. @Cheese_Peter are you going to confirm what was said and if you stand by it?
Needless to say, women are underrepresented in Chemistry and LGBT individuals are not. This didn’t stop the Royal Society of Chemistry spending £600,000 on grants to solve the imaginary problem of LGBT underepresentation. 5/6
The Royal Society of Chemistry are embarrassing themselves once again over sex and gender. They plan not to change their policies on sex and gender, even though their current guidance is plainly unlawful 1/n