Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
@steipete@seni0re@BentoBoiNFT Let us know what you think of claw3D Peter.
Could you fork it and add something cool on your spare time?
https://t.co/3rDzmF1W6F
Do your agents have a messy desk?
If not… they’re not working.
Just added a Kanban board to Claw3D.
Now you can see what your agents are doing.
Empty desk?
They’re idle.
Messy desk?
They’re busy.
Add work → agents execute.
Do your agents have a messy desk?
If not… they’re not working.
Just added a Kanban board to Claw3D.
Now you can see what your agents are doing.
Empty desk?
They’re idle.
Messy desk?
They’re busy.
Add work → agents execute.
Do your agents have a messy desk?
If not… they’re not working.
Just added a Kanban board to Claw3D.
Now you can see what your agents are doing.
Empty desk?
They’re idle.
Messy desk?
They’re busy.
Add work → agents execute.
Do your agents have a messy desk?
If not… they’re not working.
Just added a Kanban board to Claw3D.
Now you can see what your agents are doing.
Empty desk?
They’re idle.
Messy desk?
They’re busy.
Add work → agents execute.
Do your agents have a messy desk?
If not… they’re not working.
Just added a Kanban board to Claw3D.
Now you can see what your agents are doing.
Empty desk?
They’re idle.
Messy desk?
They’re busy.
Add work → agents execute.
Most dashboards look healthy right before things go wrong.
Green metrics.
Upward graphs.
Everything “within limits.”
Then one day, reality disagrees.
Because dashboards don’t measure truth.
They measure what’s easy to count.
Latency looks fine.
Volume looks strong.
Uptime looks perfect.
But nobody measured:
• who can explain a decision weeks later
• which flow changed hands quietly
• what assumptions stopped being valid
So risk doesn’t spike.
It accumulates.
This is why failures feel sudden.
Not because they were unpredictable because they were invisible by design.
Modern systems reward what can be displayed, not what can be defended.
The next generation of infrastructure will flip that.
Less obsession with surface metrics.
More focus on what survives scrutiny after attention moves on.
That’s the layer serious teams are building toward now.
@DigiMaaya sits there not making prettier dashboards, but strengthening what dashboards usually ignore.
Because the most dangerous problems don’t show up as red alerts.
They show up as questions no system can answer anymore.