@formadillo Man U have a game to schedule home against Brentford. If that went in 37 (bou) maybe Rashford could top 13? Or Haaland if City's match in 28 (WHU) moved to 34 (ful)?
@CrayfishFpl Are you not using decay on these solves or is my team set up that much worse than yours? (Likely both) I'm getting a measly +8 EV on FH28+BB29 with decay. I think I remember now that best practice for chips is 1st no decay to set week, then w/decay to set xfer plan
@CrayfishFpl Wow—seems like a lot of people (on both analytics and grass) like FH29. Will run it for my team today but maybe it’s just the (elite?) bias of “FH is better in doubles than blanks.” I’ll let you know what I turn up
@sertalpbilal This tweet sounds to me like you doubt he'll keep up his points output, but does the previous graph imply that predictions are too low? Do you think he'll fail to keep up his post-GW expected pts numbers?
@sertalpbilal@hailcheaters we’d have waited probably til 33, maybe 32. But the solver saw what’s obvious now: you can get the funds for the move AND take advantage of Burnley’s double by moving a little early. I know @bencrellin plans moves like this and it’s always seemed mystifying. Now it seems so clear