Shadow Outlier

Everything is possible until your heart stops beating.

[Sida Peng @pengsida]

InfiniSplat (SIGGRAPH Asia 2026)​ is trending on @HuggingFace!
🚀 Turn a single image into a navigable 3DGS scene in <1 second.
🏠 Stunning indoor view synthesis quality.
👉 Try it now: https://t.co/AIAUaSC8tA
🌐 Project: https://t.co/O7jEBCR2wY

[智享 @CycleDecoded]

家里的破监控摄像头有救了，GitHub 上这个项目简直是搞智能家居和视频流的技术狂魔写的神作！

如果你被摄像头延时高、跨平台推流卡顿、多协议不兼容折磨过，兄弟们直接看这个。

项目介绍
AlexxIT / go2rtc
来自 GitHub 社区的超轻量级、零依赖摄像头流媒体服务器，目前在 GitHub 搞到了 10k+ Stars（MIT 协议）。用 Go 语言写的，单个二进制文件直接运行，占用资源低到能跑在树莓派上。

核心卖点
零延迟推流：支持 RTSP 转 WebRTC/MSE，延时直接压到 0.5 秒以内。

协议万能通吃：RTSP、RTMP、WebRTC、HomeKit、HLS 全搞定。

双向语音对讲：支持小米、Wyze 等多种摄像头的反向音频传输。

无缝无脑集成：无缝对接 Home Assistant 和 Frigate，自带 FFmpeg 按需转码。

私有化极速部署：完全本地运行，不走任何云端，隐私防护拉满。

🔗 项目链接：
https://t.co/66V8IviZpr

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@MetaLawMan 他只要同意他及他的家人不从加密市场获利，法案自然能够通过，不需要什么宪法授权。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@saylor @Strategy 他的意思是从买入颜色增加一个卖出颜色。忘了他，还是看Tom Lee吧。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@Rolando_FFH 他们搞不定那个没有道德的自私的家伙，只好不计后果的强行上马投票，币圈真是多灾多难。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@llamaonthebrink 链上治理的根本问题是大部分项目都存在拿了大量筹码的大象，他们的投票决定了治理结果，散户的投票只是摆设。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

就因为一个人没有道德伦理的人在掌权，，所以Clarity法案才会纠结在道德伦理款项上，那些死活要推动法案通过的人不去完善伦理条款，却还在为那个人的道德辩护。这个世界到处是草台班子。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@Predator_fund 为这个认知捉急

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@LFCLaurie 说中国不在乎的那可真是对中国足球毫无概念呀。奈何从上到下全面腐败的体系中把球踢好不是他们追求的主要目标。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

ETH独一无二的CROPS属性必然会迎来它的爆发时刻，只不过那时候很多人手里可能没有多少ETH了。

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going.

First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want.

The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?"

Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain.

As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain.

One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan.

My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it.

Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism.

This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate.

Now how does this all get to the role of the EF?

EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter.

This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward.

And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally.

This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself)

EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects).

At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting.

To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose.

I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like:

* Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this.

* Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash.

* Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future.

Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%.

Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations.

The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support.

EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

Codex Plus现在有点过分了，5小时的限额一下就用完了。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

有没有reset啊，今天就用了一天就hit limit了，骗人的吧。

[Sam Altman @sama]

Codex hit 4M active users, less than two weeks after hitting 3M.

We will reset rate limits today!

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

最容易受害的人可能没有意愿或能力去看完和理解文章中的内容。

[Tz @Tz_2022]

https://t.co/Cf8CgyDUD7

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@chumacn 这是令人服气的，中转在国内，付款在国内，全程实名制，机场主可能也在国内。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

CRCL COIN恐慌成这样？不能直接给利息，质押一下再给不就好了？原来直接给收益只能4-5%，质押后再给可以到6-7%了，照样碾压银行。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

国际社会干预神棍和独裁政权是必须的，可惜现在国际社会以内政的方式把它们合理化了，把反抗责任扔给了没有反抗能力的当地人民，国际干预机制完全失效。然而，现在对伊朗的打击并不是出于对神棍的干预，而是出于个人或部分群体的私利，注定会失败或者需要付出更高昂的代价。

[李承鹏（大眼哥） @dayangelcp]

加拿大将军达莱尔得到一个惊人情报：胡图族将与军方联手进行大屠杀，他们的兵力足以在20分钟内杀死1000名图西族人。

第二天，达莱尔向联合国总部发出标注“最紧急”的电报。这封电报，后来被世人称为“种族灭绝传真”。

三个月来，达莱尔六次发出预警和行动请求，联合国均以“不符合国际法和联合国程序”加以拒绝。

1994年4月6日晚，卢旺达军方把第一个屠杀目标锁定女总理阿加特，她一直主张与图西族和解，杀了她，可以放手屠杀。

联合国援助团派出10名比利时伞兵保护她，却奇怪地不允许他们开火还击。比利时士兵被包围两小时后，按照命令交出武器，被总统卫队带到军营。

等达莱尔将军赶到，发现10名比利时伞兵已被肢解，尸体像“一袋袋土豆”堆叠在一起，血肉模糊，无法清点人数。

全国每个路口都有民兵和士兵把守，发现图西族，当场枪毙。成千上万图西族人逃进教堂，但这里已不是避风港。

吉孔多波兰教堂，上百名儿童被冲进来的民兵屠杀。尼昂盖天主教堂，1500多名图西族人躲在里面。民兵用推土机推倒教堂，用砍刀和步枪杀死虚墟里每个人。尼亚鲁布耶教堂，民兵不分男女老幼杀了2万多人。

面对大屠杀，联合国秘书长加利竟决定：继之前把2500人维和部队削减到270人，撤走全部维和部队。

此时卢旺达，平均每天8000人被杀，每小时333人，每分钟5人。

只有达莱尔将军抗命，他说：“我拒绝了一个合法命令，但那个命令是不道德的”。

他在遍地死尸的街道、村庄穿行，把幸存的孩子抱在怀里，收敛成年人遗体。他每天绝望地向联合国申请增援，但一无所获，只得眼睁睁看“小孩子在对岸被长刀砍死”，“全村被杀，鳄鱼在河里啃食人类残肢”。他同时得提防冷枪，他已被悬赏暗杀。

大屠杀进行了一个半月，联合国才同意将维和部队扩充至5500人。各国拖拖拉拉，6个月后才抵达，而此时大屠杀已结束——7月4日图西族反抗军攻占首都，中止长达百天的屠杀。

事后调查中，安南竟声称对达莱尔将军六次加急传真没有印象。但他未被追责，三年后反而晋升为联合国秘书长。

达莱尔将军将回忆录取名《与魔鬼握手》，因为自己没能救下更多人，这无异纵容魔鬼。他四次自杀，用剃刀割开大腿，“当血开始流出，我感到了一种虚假的平静，觉得马上就要去和那些未能拯救的人团聚了。”

2000年，他因创伤后应激障碍退役，“我的伤永远不会愈合”。

达莱尔将军不必感到耻辱，卢旺达大屠杀是联合国永远的耻辱，政客们用“国际法”“联合国章程”“程序正义”纵容了一百万平民被屠杀。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@maitian99 他嘲笑他的推文回复里的人亏钱，现在听说他爆仓了，笑死。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@maitian99 每季度提现的隐含意思就是能逢高卖出、逢低买入，否则就没有什么好传道授业解惑的。对这种波段操作高手一般人只有顶礼膜拜的份。

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

https://t.co/IR4NmxAEze

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@lqng289463 不能把小孩声音吸收掉的车厢怎么敢称静音车厢？

[Shadow Outlier @Shacl0w]

@lqng289463 不能把小孩声音吸收掉的车厢怎么敢称静音车厢？

[Peter Agboola @baba_Omoloro]

Anthropic has launched free courses to master AI with certificates for $0.00

https://t.co/hwJvuJHIdo