Hey @VICE like some kinda secret middle of the night ballot drop, I left a lil somethin for ya
I made sure it's on par with your company's journalistic quality, so you'll take it seriously
https://t.co/6RVsE9IpL3
The irate black woman trying to debank @GiveSendGo says they're trying to switch to Stripe, as Square may have already decided to ban them.
She talks like she has insiders helping her. This woman is who gets to decide who makes money.
DESTROY THE CARD NETWORKS
https://t.co/iOjcKMLVqw
>Brianna Wu runs for Congress
>loses but is now suddenly part of a PAC
>Wu starts getting involved with various streamers who get more radical and vocal with their politics
>Xanderhal reveals that streamers ARE being paid to espouse talking points from said PAC
This is big.
I don't know what makes a man look at a 300 page doc with mountains of evidence of Dev lying, and then say "you know what, I think I'll defend that man and try to discredit the writer" but here we are;
"I responded by saying if Dev HAD said or done something in my DMs that was incriminating then I would be willing to share it, because Dev would be in the wrong at that point, but at this time that has not taken place"
I was not asking for incriminating evidence, I was asking for the DMs because I know Dev lied to you about the entire situation. This is what Dev does, again evidenced by how soon after our conversation he went to you to speak about it. Dev uses a "poisoning the well" tactic where he goes and gives his version of events to someone first, and then they don't care to look into it further. I have 2 years worth of screenshots pointing out his every inconsistency and lie regarding the situation. Also, the Arch of the past might not have believed me that Dev was lying and thus didn't find anything Dev said to be "incriminating", but the Arch of today now knows it was lies if he read through the doc, so why not post the DMs of Dev telling you about "my issues'' with him now, then?
"I will absolutely tell Dev when people are asking for our DM's because that is also wrong and anyone would tell their friend's when people are going around trying to dig up dirt on them."
I was not "digging up dirt" I was hoping you would understand how much of a lying manipulator Dev is and the situation I have been in. I went to Dev to talk about how I didn't feel comfortable going on Archcast if he would also be on at the same time as me- again, instead of you, to keep you out of the issues initially. At this point I had no problems with you or going on the cast, just did not want to be there at the same time as Dev due to him covering for his moderator's actions against me. To be explicitly clear, i never wanted Dev removed from Archcast, I just only was willing to go on during days Dev was not there due to these issues.
"The only reason anyone would "redact" this part of the conversation between Kirsche and myself would be to hide the fact that Kirsche was the one asking me to give her private DM's between myself and Dev."
It literally says in the screenshot you posted: "Kirsche reached out to Arch to ask if she would be able to obtain a screenshot of the DMs"
Why are you boldface lying?
I had redacted the screenshot by request in order to not implicate the party who gave them to me. I might not be a journalist but I take protecting sources seriously. I have provided enough material everywhere else, that a single "just trust me bro" should be fine to have.
But after the release of the document, and now that you have decided to guard Dev's behavior, I have been given the green light from my source to release the screenshot.
"As our communications on the matter can simply be summed up as…"
"If Dev was talking to me about gayops, I would have no problems whatsoever with sharing that fact publicly."
SFO's moderator DFD, has been proven unequivocally to have attempted gayops against me and has been continuously trying to cause drama since 2022. SFO was – and still is – fully aware of these facts, yet claimed in the DM that he doesn't believe DFD is doing anything and tried to paint me as the one causing issues. It is not causing drama to defend myself.
I have tried the "ignore them and they will go away tactic" for over a year, but they refuse to stop instigating drama that I have never wanted any part in.
Trying the Enlightened Centrist™️ path of "I won't pick a side between these fighting women" while sweeping for Dev's bad behavior is a very weird play.
I did not plan on tweeting the full doc, but in the interest of information at this point, here it is if you have not seen it already. Everything from 2022 - current day is documented within.
https://t.co/4Kd1M1VwOh
You don't know what you're talking about.
These people have spent the past DECADE proving that they are irredeemably UGLY inside, and they won't relent until they can make you feel some semblance of the pain and bitterness they feel every day towards God for making them fucked up freaks.
The only time they care about rules, civility, unity, etc., is when those things can be used to HANDCUFF you while your kids are transed and your money is stolen to pay for some fag war or some group of people that hates you and is replacing you.
There is no reconciliation. We are not gleeful and we are not out for blood, we just know that WE CANNOT LIVE WITH THESE PEOPLE ANYMORE.
Their moral lassitude is the reason why American cities are unlivable. Their virtue signalling comes at the expense of child abuse, medical malpractice, and a couple hundred thousand dead Ukrainians. They will ALWAYS play dirty no matter how much we play fair. They need to be politically disenfranchised, publicly shamed—they need to be properly trained with electric shock therapy to keep their fucking mouths shut.
These are not people who think critically from first principles, they are THE mob you speak of. They are mob mentality incarnate—that is why they are called normies, NPCs, and the like. The idea of them exercising "free speech" is a joke, because the only thing loaded into their software is CNN talking points.
I think you are overthinking things. Your last game, "Rage", was very bad. In fact I would go so far as to call it Penis Poop. What I would suggest you do is stop being a little fucking pencil neck dork defending people wishing your president was dead (you're being a smarty pants), and get back to making games that are actually good, as that is something we are all in desperate need of right now.