@NUCLRGOLF We aren’t finishing the first hole before we’re 10 shots deep, with 4 6 milly zyns in. I’m burying Akshay’s 135 lb ass
Imma have that boy spinnin
“AI makes solo founders 10x” is BULLS***.
This isn't a "look what I built this weekend" post.
This is ONE project, 7 months in using AI to write the code.
Here's what I learned about these LLMs:
It didn’t make me faster.
It made me more systematic.
Month 1–2: I used models like a magician uses smoke.
Big prompts. Big rewrites. Big refactors.
It felt productive.
It was mostly entropy.
2/ The hidden cost of “AI speed” is invisible rework.
You don’t notice it day-to-day because the output looks smart.
You notice it week-to-week when you’re chasing ghosts across your codebase.
Month 3–4: I hit the wall every solo builder hits:
“You can’t scale vibes.”
If your workflow is “ask the model to do it,” you eventually drown in:
inconsistent changes
wrong files touched
half-fixed bugs
regressions you can’t explain
4/ My breakthrough wasn’t a better model.
It was a rule:
No execution without an audit.
AI doesn’t get to act until it proves it knows where it’s acting.
5/ So I split my workflow into two roles:
Auditor AI: find the correct file + exact location + blast radius
Doer AI: only then make the change, small and scoped
Most people skip role #1 and wonder why they’re stuck.
6/ I stopped asking: “Can you implement X?”
I started asking:
“Show me where X lives. Show me what will break if we change it.”
That one shift took my success rate way up.
7/ Here’s the other contrarian thing nobody wants to admit:
Better models didn’t remove discipline.
They punished the lack of it.
The smarter the model, the more confidently it will do the wrong thing if you’re sloppy.
8/ Month 5: I learned that “context” isn’t a big prompt.
Context is:
explicit constraints
acceptance checks
known-good references
a narrow change surface
In other words: procedures.
9/ The biggest productivity unlock wasn’t “more tokens.”
It was shrinking the unit of work.
Instead of “ship feature,” my atomic unit became:
one file
one function
one UI component
one behavior change
one test / sanity check
10/ I started running my solo build like a tiny team.
Even though it’s just me.
I’d literally write “work orders” for the model:
- what to change
- what not to touch
- how to verify
- what would count as done
11/ This is where AI actually shines:
AI is the best junior engineer you’ve ever had…
…if you give it:
tight scope
clear checks
and zero freedom to wander
12/ “But isn’t that slower?”
At first, yes.
Then something weird happens:
Your project stops accumulating debt faster than you can pay it down.
And suddenly you feel “fast” again.
13/ Month 6: models got better, and my workflow changed again.
I stopped treating the model as a writer.
I treated it as a diff generator.
Output I want:
a patch
a diffstat
a commit message
a verification checklist
Not paragraphs.
14/ The most underrated skill in the AI era is not prompting.
It’s reviewing.
If you can’t audit changes, you can’t safely use AI at speed.
15/ The second most underrated skill:
Designing workflows that are robust to model mistakes.
Because the model will be wrong.
Often.
Confidently.
16/ The real “AI advantage” after 7 months solo isn’t that I can build anything.
It’s that I can build without losing control.
I’m not “moving fast and breaking things.”
I’m moving fast and knowing what broke.
17/ If you’re a solo founder using AI and feeling stuck, here’s the playbook:
- Separate audit from execution
- Shrink the unit of work
- Force verification steps
Keep a running “rules of engagement” doc for your project
Never let the model free-roam your codebase
18/ The punchline:
AI didn’t replace my process.
It forced me to finally have one.
The winners won’t be the best “prompt engineers.”
They’ll be the people who can turn a chaotic build into a repeatable system.