Sherry Sigler

I’m starting over after cancelling Twitter last year. I love my country, my family, and God. 2020 was stolen. I ❤️ Trump

[Alexander Duncan @AlexDuncanTX]

This is Yasir Qadhi out of Texas: “We practicing Sharia in Texas, but it’s not implemented on the government yet….Allah command us to implement sharia law and subjugate every society we live in, it’s part of our agenda”.

[Farm Girl Carrie™️👩‍🌾 @FarmGirlCarrie]

When good people do nothing… evil wins.

[Sergeant News Network @sgtnewsnetwork]

EXPOSED:👀RFK Jr says Jake Tapper called him in total distress after corporate killed his exclusive story connecting vaccines to autism ⚕️💉🧬

“It's been pulled by corporate. The whole thing is gone,” Tapper told Kennedy.
[It MUST Be Noted That Tapper Was Working For ABC News At This Time; Thus "Corporate" Was ABC Corporate]

The story was about a secret meeting in Simpsonwood, Georgia where the FDA, the CDC, and the vaccine companies discussed how to hide the autism effect from the American people after an internal CDC study found kids who received higher doses of mercury from childhood shots had far higher rates of brain and developmental problems.
https://t.co/WNVt7Ch1TD

Kennedy cites 7.62 times the autism risk after the first Hep B shot, plus big spikes in ADHD, speech delay, and tics. He says they reworked the data until those safety signals disappeared.

Tapper worked on that exclusive with Kennedy for 21 days. It was set to air the same night Rolling Stone published Kennedy's "Deadly Immunity" article.

Tapper told Kennedy it was the first time in his career corporate had ever killed one of his stories. Then he never spoke to Kennedy again.

RFK JR.: "I had this interesting experience with Jake Tapper where when I worked on my Rolling Stone article 'Deadly Immunity' — which was about this secret meeting that took place in Simpsonwood, Georgia by CDC and all of the vaccine companies and FDA etc., where they decided to hide the autism effect from the American people — and I got the transcripts and published in Rolling Stone."
https://t.co/nZS8b0EegF

"And Jake Tapper worked for 21 days with me on an exclusive story. And he was going to air simultaneously with Rolling Stone publishing it."

"And Tapper, the night before it went on, called me in total distress, and he said, 'It's been pulled by corporate. The whole thing is gone.'"
[It MUST be noted that SOME of the information to have been published by Rolling Stone Magazine in the "Deadly Immunity" article WERE FOUND in SALONs "Letters" and can be viewed here: https://t.co/YEmpYdfRHA]

"He said, 'Never in my career has corporate killed one of my stories, and I'm really angry.' And then I called him back the next day. He's never spoken to me again."

@RobertKennedyJc @jaketapper @ABC @FDA @CDC #simpsonwood #covid #vaccine #autism #adhd @RollingStone #DeadlyImmunity #coverup @Salon

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

https://t.co/yvJOwOS4xE

[TruthHammer4EVA @TruthHammer4EVA]

For years I have believed Trump's ultimate plan for his legacy is to both drain the DC swamp AND to pass Constitutional Amendments that will correct suicidal defects in some of our institutions... but I never saw exactly how he could accomplish that with so much resistance from both Dems and RINOs.

👀👉A way has suddenly become clear even if it would require Republicans to be more aggressive than they have been willing to be in the past, and it seems that Trump has already taken initial steps to set it up.

There is a looming battle between certain states, and the federal government, over the issue of voter eligibility, and whether the states can be forced to comply with federal law.

Up to 30 states are currently dragging their feet, or outright refusing, to prove their voter rolls are compliant with federal requirements about citizenship, with many lawsuits pending.

Courts are so far refusing to block Trump Executive Order 14399 outright requiring states to verify federal election voter eligibility, and imposes requirements on the USPS for handling mail in ballots, however on 8 occasions lower courts have so far ruled against the DOJ trying to get voter rolls from California, Oregon, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, Arizona, Maine, Wisconsin. None of these cases have gone to the US Supreme Court yet.

If this Order is ultimately upheld, then it and existing federal election law, set up conditions where some state elections may be deemed invalid.

If the controversial idea of ending the Senate filibuster is often described as a "nuclear option", then what's coming in January 2027 and January 2029 could be both vastly more powerful and vastly more controversial, yet well within the constitutional power of Republicans at that time... because the Republican controlled House and Senate will have no obligation to accept the results of non-compliant state elections.

Let me repeat this point. If a state runs an election that is known to be non-compliant with federal election laws, then the House & Senate have the authority to CHOOSE NOT TO seat their respective new members until a new election is run that COMPLIES WITH THE LAW.
See Article I, Section 5 authority.

In today's highly polarized political climate ask yourself... what factors would encourage Republicans to seize this power sitting in their hands, versus what factors would encourage them to dilute their own power and swear their ideological enemies into office? Many arguments and counter arguments are possible for those trying to predict what Republicans WILL do. I am merely showing what they may be in a position to do.

👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. House may refuse to seat any new Representative from states that will not comply.

These 30 states have about 280 House Reps up for election in 2026... so the number of sworn in Representatives could legally drop as low as 155 in 2026. Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case)

Only 78 House Reps would be needed for simple majority vote business in 2027. IN 2027 ONLY 104 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE.

👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. Senate may refuse to seat any new Senator from states that will not comply.

These same 30 states have about 30 Senators up for election with roughly 15 in 2026 and 15 in 2028... so the number of sworn in Senators could legally drop to 85 in 2026 and 70 in 2028. Again, Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case)

Only 43 Senators would be needed for normal majority vote business in 2027, and only 36 in 2029. IN 2027 ONLY 57 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE.

The numbers above are extreme and it would certainly not play out that way. Some states will comply rather than risk their members of Congress not being sworn in, and being unable to vote. Some states have stated they will NOT comply, and those states are all Democrat controlled... so it becomes pretty obvious that any members of Congress not seated are going to cause the balance of control to swing strongly towards Republicans.

🔥After January 3, 2027 the Trump admin could have a Super Majority in House and Senate. They can pass regular legislation unopposed and even Constitutional Amendments that would still need to be ratified by 38 States before they can take effect.

But let's be realistic about something that concerns us all. Even with a clear path to seize a powerful majority and force states to run compliant elections... will Republicans do it?

The hope needed might be found in the newer more fired up slate of Congress already lining up for 2026 elections. Redistricting is already expanding Republican leads in the House. Many powerful RINOs are on their way out.

But ultimately YOU are the only thing that can make Congress have the spine required to seize this opportunity. Clearly Trump is teeing it up to make this possible. The Republic is being given a chance to save itself, and needs to step up.

[Joey Mannarino @JoeyMannarino]

Someone asked me where my feelings for Islam come from. There’s the problem.

I don’t have “feelings” for Islam. I simply have facts about the religion.

They follow a man named Mohammed.

This man was a pedophile. He married a six year old and had sex with her when she was nine.

His teachings are ones that tell his followers to kill anyone who doesn’t believe in Islam.

He preached that you could lie to anyone who didn’t believe in Islam and tell them anything you felt like to convert them.

Islam treats women like shit. They have to wear burqas and are second-class citizens in every situation. It’s totally permissible to beat the living hell out of your wife for no reason.

Rape is also permissible to any woman who is not a Moslem. It’s literally a tool of war in Islam.

Mohammed’s followers also take on the role of “jihadist” in which they kill anyone who doesn’t believe in their religion.

They’ve convinced themselves that the best thing on earth is a black box and they pray to it five times a day in doggystyle position.

They won’t touch bacon and think it’s deadly.

They can’t use toilet paper.

They can’t even draw a picture of the Prophet they love so much. Must be an ugly dude!

They’ve even been convinced by their Pedophile Prophet that dogs are impure and dirty.

Now, these facts make it a pretty shitty religion if you ask me… and that would be fine if they practiced it in silence and didn’t try to impose it on others.

They have 55 countries where they are able to practice it, however flawed it may be. I don’t have to live there so that’s fine.

But they’ve decided to come to the West and want me to change my way of life to adapt to their way of life.

I’m supposed to eat halal meat because they eat halal meat.

I’m supposed to give up my dog because they don’t like dogs.

I’m supposed to let the take down the World Trade Center and not complain about it and just move on and allow them to worship their Allah?

I’m supposed to believe that the book they love to reference is a book of peace.

And if I question any of it I’m Islamophobic.

So, when you ask how I developed my feelings on the Moslems… I quite simply evaluated the facts.

The facts make it clear this is not something for me.

Despite knowing that, they tried to impose it on me anyway.

So now I cannot stand it. And that’s all.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Great points

[Rothmus 🏴 @Rothmus]

She is 100% correct.

[Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle @KenCao_onChina]

Why Trump Won’t Let Greenland Become China’s Next Colony. Greenland or Bust: How Trump Blocked China’s Arctic Play.

Trump just shook NATO with tariffs tied to one word: Greenland.
The media says he’s unhinged. They’re wrong.
This video breaks down why Greenland is a frontline asset in the next great-power conflict, why China wants it, why Denmark can’t defend it alone, and why Trump’s move is not madness—but strategy.

This isn’t about bullying allies or taking land.
It’s about geography, security, and preventing Chinese expansion in the Arctic.
Greenland is not optional.
And power in the 21st century doesn’t wait for permission.

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

U.S. Offers To Trade Its Liberal Women For Iranian Women https://t.co/k4aivNQ7IG

[🔥Tyson Ranes🔥 @TysonRanes]

This is great.
Everyone should take a listen

[Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸 @KathleenWinche3]

This man is spot on about the false narrative of the liberal mind virus! 🦠
The silence during Biden regime was deafening when they arrested illegals during his time in office!
Hypocrisy once again! 🤦‍♀️

[Jarrod Rodriguez @JarrodRodrigue1]

I feel like this needs to go viral

[EKO @EkoLovesYou]

https://t.co/BkIz3saq5f

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

The media: "There is no proof that Zohran Mamdani is a communist."

Zohran Mamdani: "Seize the properties."

[Paratrooper Brady @paratroopbrady]

President Donald J Trump is the GOAT.

[Rapid Response 47 @RapidResponse47]

ICYMI: @BretBaier's full, must-watch interview with the @DOGE team on their efforts to fulfill @POTUS's mission of making government work for the people again

[Jordan Schachtel @JordanSchachtel]

If you watch the full Trump-Zelensky press conference, it is very clear that Zelensky, not Trump or Vance, became the antagonist. Both POTUS and VP were very respectful and cordial until Zelensky very publicly ignited a firestorm.

It all starts at 40:30

1) Zelensky essentially rejects how VP described the mandate of POTUS to conduct foreign affairs, and he insinuates that Trump term one did nothing to stop Putin.

2) He then basically tells Vance that his ideas are faulty and that the administration's diplomacy won't work.

These two comments are *deliberately antagonistic.* Everything was all well and good, but Zelensky took two major shots in a public forum, and they had to respond. And respond they did.

Recall, this is the guy who interfered in our electoral politics and called VP "too radical," and bashed Trump in an interview with New York Mag weeks before the election.

Zelensky is ENTIRELY at fault here. 100%.

[Big Fish @BigFish3000]

Megyn Kelly tearing George Stephanopoulos to shreds. Today it’s costing ABC 15 Million and he has to apologize.