When the news about GPT-5.6 broke, my stomach dropped.
We've officially hit a wall with AI, and this could very well be the pin that pops the bubble.
The entire global economy is riding on what happens next.
Nobody is connecting the dots - let me explain:
Right now, the entire economy is riding on one bet:
AI succeeds.
And almost nobody realises how exposed that leaves us.
In Q1 2026, AI capex accounted for ~75% of US GDP growth, and companies are expected to pour $800B+ into AI this year alone.
Strip out AI spending, and growth is effectively zero.
Here's where things gets dangerous:
The government just started gatekeeping AI.
Fable 5 was pulled, GPT-5.6's release has been delayed for weeks, and now the government wants to approve access to frontier models "customer by customer."
If the government keeps throttling AI, progress stalls (already happening).
If progress stalls, the spending stalls.
If the spending stalls, ~75% of GDP growth stalls with it.
The entire economy has become one giant leveraged bet on AI's success.
The irony about all of this is that AI worked so well and moved so fast that it became its own bottleneck.
Your network really is your networth.
Look at your inner circle. Do they inspire you? Do they lift you up? Do they help you become better?
If the answer is no.
Find a new circle ⭕️
1) Hey Twitter,
It's me, the biolabs guy. Aka "Clandestine".
I was banned on 2/25/22, 11 months ago, for writing the viral thread about the US funded biolabs in Ukraine (attached).
In this thread, I am going to administer the biggest "I told you so" in history.
#USBiolabs
Initial thoughts after the interview:
-Putin knows way too much history
-Putin is operating on an intellectual plane far above all US politicians
-Putin appears to want cooperation but the West have isolated Russia
-Putin does not want to invade Poland or take over the world
-Putin is not the deranged warmonger the MSM describes him as
-Putin is well-aware of the “Deep State” and recognizes the CIA as nefarious
I really wanted to see Putin go into detail on the degeneration of Western society, gender insanity, etc., because I think it would have resonated with the American People. The history about Ukrainian Nazism will be effective and his talk of “denazification” will certainly draw some attention.
Obviously I wanted Tucker to ask Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine, but as I stated yesterday, this topic might be too far of a jump down the rabbit hole for those new to this realm. This interview seemed to be an introductory first impression to appeal to Western citizens and disprove the MSM-created perception of Putin.
Anyone who watched the interview objectively would have to agree that Putin is not the monster we were told he was, and negotiations can be made if there is competency from US leadership. Hopefully this will change the perception of the US being innocent darlings in the conflict, and can eventually lead to mass realization that the US/NATO are the ones who brought war and weapons to Russia’s doorstep via espionage and CIA color revolutions.
@TuckerCarlson The balls on Tucker! What a legend ! The world is opening its eyes thanks to this incredible human 🙏 your work will change the world 🌎 #thankyoutucker
@TuckerCarlson Putin was soft.
He could have ripped American society apart.
The whole interview felt like playing my dad at chess.
You don’t know why the master moved the pawn…
And by the time you find out.
It’s too late.