@JatinTweets_ Post this only if you are okay with your husband cheating on you or you are okay with your brother in law cheating on your sister or you are okay with your father cheating on your mom. This isn’t funny. It’s sad. The home wrecker Tabu and disloyal Ajay
@poudelliza01@USEmbassyNepal Sadly it’s India and US’s strategy against China and all they need is our land so we are doomed. Our country is no longer a buffer state.
He was never on the island and is not mentioned in any of the files…
He loves animals…
He has strong morals and values…
Russia is lucky to have him. ❤️
And just like that, the "Russian propaganda" talking points about "Russia fighting against satanism" and "men in dark suits" ruling the world has actually turned out to be the reality.
Putin was right about everything he said about the West.
It's why they hate him so much.
JUST IN🇷🇺🔥 Putin preparing to establish an armed anti-Satanism military including #WAGNER to fight Satanism and sorcery and says it’s a threat to humanity.
🚨#Putin protecting Russia from Epstein, Satanic branches and Western powers.
When it’s confirmed in the Epstein files that Vladimir Putin didn’t kidnap children from Ukraine, instead evacuated them to protect them from being sold into child sex trafficking......
Just my POV : krushna is overrated in LC 🙂🤚.
Abhishek trying hard to look like he's OG but actually he's a big bully.
Some so called OG's have so much superiority complex.
Harpal is the most biased judge & bharti isn't good as a host in LC .
#LaughterChefs#LaughterChefs3
This guy doesn’t deserve the hate he’s getting.
Hello @AnupamMittal ,
I am writing this message with due respect, but also with genuine concern, regarding the way one of the entrepreneurs was treated on Shark Tank India.
I want to clarify at the outset that my intention is not to defend misuse of professional titles. If the entrepreneur was incorrectly using the prefix “Doctor,” that is a separate legal and ethical matter and should absolutely be addressed through proper channels.
However, beyond that specific issue, the overall tone and intensity of the criticism directed at him felt disproportionately harsh.
During the episode, you stated that only three proven solutions exist for hair loss, namely Finasteride, Minoxidil, and Dutasteride. While that statement may be accurate strictly from a pharmaceutical approval standpoint, it overlooks a very relevant reality of today’s consumer market.
A large part of the personal-care and dermatology industry today operates in the space of cosmeceuticals and nutraceuticals, not prescription drugs.
Many mainstream brands, including those represented on the same panel, operate on this very premise.
For instance:
- Mamaearth, founded by Ghazal Alagh, actively markets plant-based, toxin-free formulations and has made strong claims around hair fall reduction, scalp health, and skin improvement.
- The Minimalist, founded by Mohit Yadav, who was sitting just next to you sells formulations that include both actives and supportive ingredients, many of which are not FDA-approved drugs but are backed by studies, consumer data, and long-term usage globally.
These brands have built multi-hundred-crore businesses using exactly the same category of claims, positioning, and consumer education models.
It is also important to acknowledge that science has progressed significantly beyond a binary “approved vs useless” framework.
Several natural and plant-derived compounds are now widely researched and increasingly mainstream, including:
- Saw Palmetto, a known 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, often described as a milder, natural analogue to Finasteride
- Rosemary oil, with multiple studies comparing its efficacy to Minoxidil for scalp stimulation
- Pumpkin seed oil, shown to support hair density and follicular health
- Caffeine, Niacinamide, Biotin, Green tea extract, and Ginseng, all of which are now standard ingredients in global hair and skincare formulations
These are not fringe ideas anymore.
They are part of modern, evidence-backed, alternative and complementary science that consumers across the world are actively adopting, often due to concerns around side effects of long-term chemical drug usage.
My concern, therefore, is not disagreement, but duality.
When similar claims are made by large, well-established brands, they are accepted as marketing, consumer positioning, or early-stage science. But when a smaller entrepreneur does the same, the response becomes dismissive and personal. That inconsistency is what felt unfair.
Shark Tank has always been positioned as a platform to encourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and learning, not just policing.
A more balanced approach, acknowledging nuance, limitations, and emerging science, would have been far more constructive.
Alternative medicine and nature-backed science are no longer “experimental.” They are increasingly mainstream. Questioning claims is necessary, but doing so with proportionality and consistency is equally important.
I hope this feedback is taken in the spirit it is written, respectfully, thoughtfully, and with the intent of making an already impactful platform even better.
PS: I have absolutely no association with that entrepreneur, his company, in fact, I do not even remember the brand name anymore.
This post is not a defence of a person, but a reflection on the clear duality in how founders are treated on the show while previous Shark is doing the exact same thing without Dr. Prefix.
Thank you.