🚨For 65 Years , Hindu didn’t Understand that The Gandhi Family Wanted a Mu$lim Nation ! … BUT
🚨 In 11 Years , Mu$lims Understand that Modi Wants a Hindu Nation !!
🚨 Wake Up Call For Hindus !! 👇
A truck driver who works in Europe found trucks parts made in India. Make in India going global 🇮🇳
Anything that Rahul Gandhi criticizes becomes a success. He should try it on himself 😉
I proved on a BBC documentary in 2013 alongside MP Ann Cryer that rape gangs were fully embedded with Islam.
Confirmed by an Islamic scholar.
If only the powers that be had listened.
Instead they demonised, cancelled, and set out to destroy me.
Texas is rapidly moving toward Islamic takeover, with the Muslim population tripling in just 30 years.
Muslims are building exclusive enclaves, while street names are being changed into Urdu and Arabic.
With mosques growing by 35% in just ten years, @pujaranaa explains the Islamization of Texas.
40000 obscene videos of Hindu women were recovered from Manish Sharma (alias Moin Khan) in Kota, Rajasthan
In these obscene videos, they made Hindu women perform obscene acts involving Hindu gods and then blackmailed them
They also used these videos to convert women in other countries
United Nations need to look into human right abuses of Shang and Nong caste.
Shang caste is often ghettoed in tier 3 cities where scenes like this are common.
CCP often releases such toxic pollutants a week before salary day hoping they have to pay less number of Shang caste😢
Chinese propaganda, with its insatiable desire to present itself in a more favorable light, knows no bounds. 🤡
Just like colonialists in the 17-18th century used to wear, powdered wigs and face powder to hide the effects of diseases like syphilis. 😩
Why does no one care?
In Africa, Arab Muslims are enslaving black African Christians.
The media, progressives, Palestinian protesters, the UN, and even the Pope remain silent.
Discussion about the most horrific grooming scandal of Britain is brought to India by @CNNnews18 and @RShivshankar Kudos.
They gave a polite term called Grooming Gang
We call them
Love Jihad
Corporate Jihad
Gym Jihad
At the end of the day what they do is Jihad. It’s a form of terrorism.
You must listen to the whole discussion from the links provided in the reply. This discussion should continue to happen everywhere.
Truth must be told and heard by everyone. This is not isolated to Britain. Our ancestors in India have seen, experienced and fought back these Jihaadis for centuries.
Read the sentences flashing on the screen which will blow your minds. They are so chilling just to read them. Imagine the plight of the minor girls that went through the pain.
We have Ajmer Dargah scandal a little back, then we have scores of victims in Kerala story which is still fresh in our minds.
@RupertLowe10@ARanganathan72 sir 👏🏼👏🏼
THE UKRAINE LESSON PAKISTAN IS STUDYING - AND THE STRATEGIC GAP INDIA CANNOT AFFORD TO IGNORE
An Analysis of the New Warfare Doctrine and What It Means for the India-Pakistan Equation
Start With Russia. End With India.
Right now, as you read this, approximately 330 drones and missiles are simultaneously flying toward Russian territory. Tonight alone.
Since late 2022, Russia has routinely employed almost one thousand drones per night in attack waves against Ukrainian targets, exploiting their relatively low cost to exhaust air defenses. Russia - one of the two nuclear superpowers of the Cold War era, possessor of the world's largest nuclear arsenal, with a defence industrial complex that once armed half the planet - is being systematically bled by a country that on June 22, 2022 sent its very first strike drone toward Russian territory. A single civilian commercial drone bought from China.
By 2025, Ukraine was producing 10 million drones annually. By 2026, projections exceed 25 million units across various classes. 80–85% of frontline targets are now engaged by UAVs.
What Ukraine did to Russia in three years is the most important military transformation of the 21st century. And Pakistan's military establishment - staffed with some of the most serious students of modern warfare in South Asia, has been watching every frame of it.
India must understand what they have been learning.
📌 CHAPTER I: THE UKRAINE DOCTRINE - HOW A WEAK STATE DEFEATED CONVENTIONAL MILITARY LOGIC
In 2014, Ukrainian soldiers were throwing their phones into the air hoping a text message to their commanders would connect. Their military was hollowed out, under-equipped, and structurally dependent on Soviet-era doctrine and equipment.
Since February 2022, the conflict in Ukraine has served as a vast laboratory for the use of drones on a high-intensity battlefield. Within months, these systems became indispensable, reshaping doctrines, saturating defenses, and driving a permanent technological war of attrition.
The transformation was not gradual. It was revolutionary. And it followed a precise sequence:
Phase 1 - 2022: Mass deployment. Ukraine launched its Army of Drones programme through crowdfunding, distributing UAVs down to company level and training thousands of operators. The drone became a tactical survival tool, used for reconnaissance and artillery fire adjustment.
Phase 2 - 2022–2023: Rise of strikes and counterstrikes. Both sides strengthened air and electromagnetic defences. MALE drones virtually disappeared from the tactical battlefield. Kamikaze systems and loitering munitions - Iranian Shaheds deployed in swarms - began to dominate. A drone's battlefield lifespan was measured in individual flights.
Phase 3 - 2024–2025: AI integration. FPV drones evolved with fiber-optic tethers impervious to jamming, extending range to 20 kilometres. Long-range models reach hundreds of kilometres, targeting logistics deep behind lines. Semi-autonomous killer drones identify targets via machine learning, processing video feeds in real time, reducing operator workload amid electronic warfare saturation.
The economic disruption this produced is staggering: NATO-sourced analysis confirms Ukrainian drones are responsible for more than 65% of destroyed Russian tanks. FPV drones priced under $500 each are destroying equipment worth millions.
This is the fundamental military-economic revolution of our era: the cost of destroying an asset has been permanently decoupled from the cost of building it. A $500 FPV drone destroys a $5 million tank. A $2,000 Shahed destroys a $50 million piece of infrastructure. The attacker's economics are catastrophically favourable. The defender's economics are catastrophically unfavourable.
Modern air defense must prioritize scale, cost control, and integration across many simple systems rather than dependence on a small number of high-end weapons. Initial reliance on expensive missiles against low-cost drones created an unsustainable model.
Russia has not "won" despite its overwhelming conventional superiority, nuclear arsenal, larger economy, and unlimited political will to fight. It has been bled into strategic exhaustion by a country that learned to substitute mass, low-cost, rapidly iterable drone production for every conventional military capability it lacked.
Pakistan's military planners have read every page of this.
📌 CHAPTER II: THE OPERATION SINDOOR CEASEFIRE - A STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT**
The argument that Operation Sindoor's ceasefire was a strategic blunder - comparable to Indira Gandhi's 1971 Shimla generosity or Lal Bahadur Shastri's 1965 Tashkent concession - deserves serious engagement, not dismissal.
The historical pattern is damning:
1965: India held Lahore's outskirts. Shastri accepted Tashkent under Soviet and American pressure. Pakistan returned to pre-war positions having learnt that initiating conflict with India carries no permanent territorial cost.
1971: India had Pakistan's 93,000 soldiers as prisoners and the option of dismantling Pakistan's western military capacity entirely. Indira Gandhi chose Shimla, returned the prisoners, and extracted no permanent strategic concession beyond the creation of Bangladesh. Pakistan rebuilt its military, developed nuclear weapons, and within two decades was running proxy terror operations in Punjab and Kashmir.
2025: India had destroyed Pakistan's air defence system, struck 13 air bases, demonstrated complete air superiority, and was 88 hours into an operation with momentum entirely in its favour. The ceasefire came at American pressure, channelled through Rubio's call to Asim Munir, before India's military objectives were complete.
The parallel argument: Pakistan now knows that India will strike hard but stop when American pressure arrives. That the nuclear bluff works - not because Pakistan would use nuclear weapons, but because the threat triggers American diplomatic intervention before India can achieve decisive results. That the cost of sponsoring terrorism against India is bounded and manageable.
Where the blunder argument has structural limits:
The 1965 and 1971 analogies are imperfect because both involved conventional military occupations of territory that create long-term liabilities. Operation Sindoor was a precision strike campaign - its objectives were destruction of terrorist infrastructure and establishment of deterrence doctrine, not territorial conquest. Both objectives were achieved. Continuing would have shifted from a successful limited operation to an open-ended war with escalation risks India's leadership calculated were not worth the additional gains.
The honest assessment: the blunder was not stopping - it was stopping without extracting a permanent structural concession. No demilitarisation of Pakistan's border zone. No international monitoring of terrorist camps. No American commitment to consequence if Pakistan restarts its terror infrastructure. The ceasefire was accepted without terms. That is where the 1965 and 1971 comparison bites.
📌 CHAPTER III: THE PAKISTAN RECALIBRATION - WHAT RAWALPINDI IS STUDYING RIGHT NOW
Pakistan's military establishment is not stupid. It is, in fact, one of the most institutionally sophisticated military organisations in the developing world - staffed by officers who study global conflicts with the intensity of people who know their next war is not hypothetical.
What lessons is GHQ Rawalpindi drawing from Ukraine?
Lesson 1 - Drone Swarm Saturation
Russia's strategy of pairing small-group infiltrations with bombardments using large numbers of tactical and long-range drones has paralysed ground forces and rendered airpower much less decisive. Regional exercises and war games in 2025 revealed a shocking lack of preparedness even in NATO.
Pakistan's application: A coordinated barrage of low-cost Turkish Bayraktar TB2s, Chinese Wing Loong IIs, and indigenously produced Shahpar drones - launched simultaneously from multiple vectors -toward Indian infrastructure targets. Not to achieve air superiority. To saturate and exhaust India's air defence expenditure. India's S-400, Akashteer, and Akash systems are sophisticated and expensive. Every interceptor costs multiples of what it destroys.
The drone revolution has created a new taxonomy: expendable assets, attritable assets, risk-tolerant assets, and survivable assets. Where commanders once faced a binary choice between risking high-value assets or foregoing operations entirely, they now have degrees of risk appropriate to different threat environments.
Pakistan can afford to lose 500 drones costing $2,000 each - $1 million total - if those drones force India to expend $500 million in air defence munitions. That is the Ukraine arithmetic applied to the India-Pakistan equation.
Lesson 2 - Infrastructure as the Strategic Target
Ukraine demonstrated that attacking energy infrastructure - power grids, dams, fuel depots, industrial nodes - degrades an adversary's war-making capacity without requiring territorial conquest or air superiority. The civilian suffering this produces also generates international pressure for ceasefire.
Pakistan's application: Adani ports, Gujarat petrochemical infrastructure, border power stations, and dam infrastructure in the western river systems. These targets require minimal drone accuracy - large structures hit by even partially functional drones cause significant damage. The satellite imagery of damage generates international pressure. The economic disruption compounds the military cost.
Lesson 3 - China and Turkey as the Resupply Chain
Ukraine's capacity to sustain drone warfare rests on its ability to produce 25 million drones annually, with international partners financing production in distributed European facilities.
Pakistan's equivalent: China can manufacture and deliver drone components to Pakistan faster than any Western arms control mechanism can respond. Turkish Bayraktars are politically insulated from American pressure - Turkey is a NATO member and will not accept US veto over its defence exports. In a drone attrition war, Pakistan's resupply chain is structurally more resilient than India's interception expenditure.
Lesson 4 - Chinese Satellite Support
Ukraine's battlefield advantage rests heavily on commercial satellite communications and intelligence - creating what is effectively an Internet of the Battlefield.
The Chinese equivalent is BeiDou and China's commercial imaging constellation. In a Pakistan-India conflict where China has explicit strategic interest in Pakistan's survival, Chinese satellite support for Pakistani targeting and communications is not a hypothetical. It is a planned capability.
📌 CHAPTER IV: INDIA'S STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITIES - THE HONEST ACCOUNTING
India's air defence performed brilliantly in May 2025. Akashteer achieved a 100% kill rate against Pakistani drone swarms. S-400 intercepted all incoming missiles. The success was real and should be acknowledged.
But Ukraine teaches that the question is not whether your air defence works in the first engagement. The question is whether it remains economically sustainable across months of attrition warfare.
Vulnerability 1 - The Interceptor Cost Asymmetry
Initial reliance on expensive missiles against low-cost drones created an unsustainable economic model. Air defence must prioritise scale, cost control, and integration across many simple systems.
India's Akash missile costs approximately ₹2.5 crore per unit. A Chinese FPV drone equivalent costs ₹15,000. The ratio is 1:166. If Pakistan can manufacture or source drones at scale - and China can ensure they can - the attrition economics favour Pakistan catastrophically in a long conflict.
Vulnerability 2 - No Deep Drone Manufacturing Ecosystem
After the outbreak of war in Ukraine, the number of drone manufacturing companies rose from 41 in 2022 to 183 in 2024. Ukraine now produces 4.5 million drones annually.
India has no equivalent drone manufacturing ecosystem at anything approaching this scale. Make in India defence initiatives are maturing but remain years from the kind of rapid-iteration, decentralised, startup-driven drone production that Ukraine developed under existential pressure.
Vulnerability 3 - Critical Infrastructure Concentration
India's major infrastructure - Adani ports, Gujarat petrochemical, Bhakra Nangal and other dam systems, western railway nodes - is geographically concentrated and not hardened against drone attack at the scale a saturation campaign would require. Ukraine's infrastructure survived three years of Russian strikes partly through dispersal, redundancy, and Western repair support. India has none of these buffers institutionalised.
📌 CHAPTER V: WHAT INDIA MUST BUILD - THE STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE**
The analysis above is not defeatist. It is diagnostic. India has significant structural advantages Pakistan does not: a larger economy growing at 7%+, a maturing defence industrial base, the S-400, a satellite constellation, and the demonstrated will to use force decisively.
But the Ukraine lesson demands specific institutional responses:
Response 1 - A Drone Manufacturing Industrial Policy
India needs the equivalent of Ukraine's Army of Drones programme - a nationally funded, startup-driven, rapid-iteration drone manufacturing ecosystem that can produce counter-drone interceptors at $500–2,000 per unit rather than $250,000 per Akash missile. iDEX has begun this work. It needs ten times the funding and a wartime urgency framing.
Response 2 - Infrastructure Hardening as Strategic Priority**
Critical national infrastructure - particularly in Gujarat and Rajasthan, the likely target zones in any Pakistan escalation - needs hardened protection, dispersed redundancy, and active drone defence perimeters. Ukraine's experience suggests that infrastructure protection requires a dedicated doctrine, not an afterthought to conventional military planning.
Response 3 - Demanding Structural Concessions Before Any Future Ceasefire
The lesson of 1965, 1971, and 2025 is identical: India wins the battle and accepts a ceasefire without structural concessions, leaving Pakistan free to recalibrate and return. The next ceasefire - if India initiates conflict again - must be conditional on verifiable, internationally monitored dismantlement of terror infrastructure. No terms, no ceasefire.
Response 4 - Countering the China-Turkey Resupply Chain Diplomatically
India must use its leverage with Turkey - a significant trade partner - and with Western capitals to establish in advance that Chinese or Turkish drone resupply to Pakistan during an active conflict constitutes a casus belli for economic consequences. The diplomatic groundwork must be laid before the shooting starts.
The Verdict
Ukraine is an early and highly accelerated case of a broader global shift in which drones are becoming a standard instrument of warfare. The operational, doctrinal, and ethical consequences of this shift will increasingly shape conflicts far beyond Europe.
Pakistan's military planners are not watching Ukraine as passive observers. They are running war games, updating doctrine, and building the drone acquisition pipeline that the Ukraine lesson demands. China and Turkey are willing suppliers. The attrition economics favour them in any extended conflict.
India won Operation Sindoor decisively. It established a new deterrence doctrine. It called Pakistan's nuclear bluff. These are genuine, historic achievements.
But the war that Pakistan is now planning - informed by three years of watching Ukraine bleed Russia through drone attrition, infrastructure targeting, and cost asymmetry warfare - will not look like May 2025. It will look like what Russia faces tonight: 330 drones in the air simultaneously, aimed at the things a country cannot afford to lose.
India needs to be building its answer to that war. Now. Not after the next Pahalgam.
lSlS committed Genocide against 500K Yezidis for refusing to convert to lslam,killed 10K, kidnapped 7K Yezidi women,lSlS burned 19 Yezidi girls alive for refusing to convert to lsIam and be sex slaves,beheaded 50 Yezidi women.
Not a single MusIim protest
This is how China treats its low-caste factory workers.
China’s low-level factory workers are paid less than higher-cast staff. They don’t even have time to wash up, because if they’re late, the higher-caste workers will get served better meals with expensive ingredients.
#Bharat_itihasa
🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉
🛑 Carl Sagan, an astronomer and planetary scientist, rightly observed that Hinduism’s cyclical model of the universe aligns with scientific ideas like oscillating universes, cosmic expansion and contraction, and the possibility of multiple creations.
He praised the ancient rishis for envisioning time scales far ahead of those of other civilizations.
Through his iconic documentary series Cosmos, Carl Sagan familiarized millions of "ignorant Western audiences" with Hindu ideas such as Nataraja's cosmic dance, the vast cycles of the yugas, and the immense timescales found in the Vedas and Puranas.
At the very beginning, Carl Sagan cited the ancient Hindu scripture, the Rigveda, and acknowledged, “The most sophisticated cosmological ideas came from Asia and particularly from India.
Here, there is a tradition of sceptical questioning and unselfconscious humility before the great cosmic mysteries."
Indian culture is rich, but Elon's algorithm doesn't push it.