Sibyl

Free spirit in pursuit of knowledge that is seemingly infinite.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

The Test of a Man - Author Unknown #Trump2024

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

Perfect day for Starship launch!🚀

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@greta When they’re ready for preorder he will drop a link on his page. They are absolutely stunning, made with high grade materials.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

I’m old enough to remember when celebrity fashion accessories were purse pets. From tiny dog breeds to pet eunuchs is beyond bizarre.

[Gays Against Groomers @againstgrmrs]

Naomi Watts has been transing her son since he was a very young child. Now he is 17 years old and is being used as her fashion accessory.

Can you feel the trans joy? It’s so overpowering it’s nearly breaking through the screen 🥴

So sad.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@SarahisCensored

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@KyleSeraphin Coroners note: Burnt beyond recognition. 🔥

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@KyleSeraphin The double entendre on point. 🤣

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@KyleSeraphin Liberal women are programmed to trust feelings and the bear.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@SteveBakerUSA @FBI I find it curious that he looks directly into the surveillance camera. His “numbers” photos are poorly framed and not suitable for publication, but makes for a good cover story. He changed his hat, but not his easily identifiable jacket? Probably for comfort. Dig deeper into him.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

Innocent were the three young victims. That one juror didn’t believe her innocent and he held out, bravely. Clearly she’s not normal, but cold and calculating. Insane? I have great doubt. Here Dr. Younis lays out what the majority of the jurors seem to have missed.

[Joseph Younis, MD @YounisJoseph]

I avoided commenting on the Lindsay Clancy trial because its nuanced and emotional but the implications are enormous so I am going to say something now. A lot of people are calling that one juror who wouldn't join the other eleven irrational. But, that juror is probably the only one asking the right questions imo: where is the evidence that she lacked the capacity to know it was wrong or to stop herself? And, maybe, where do we draw the line on what an ostensibly insane person is allowed to do when the doubt the defense manufactured rests on nothing in the record before the killings? It seems that the entirety of the defense position rests on improbable probabilities and that's a low bar for such a heinous act.

1. Postpartum psychosis is rare, and almost always happens in the first 4 weeks. The idea that some psychiatrists extend the postpartum window to a year is true, but for depression and anxiety. The evidence isn't strong for psychosis, and its latching on to improbability

2. The strongest risk factor for postpartum psychosis is preexisting bipolar disorder or a prior psychotic episode. She had neither before her third child. The real time evidence from her doctors/providers indicate this. The bipolar label that showed up was after significant polypharmacy, and any good psychiatrist will tell you that you cannot diagnose primary disease when multiple drugs could be offending agents. Drug-induced psychosis would show better temporal correlations with her medications and should be a mitigation argument at sentencing. Again, very improbable alignment

3. The proxy for intent is planning, and she clearly planned... she sent her husband to some restaurant they don't normally go to, checked the drive time, texted a specific order at 5:07 pm... she killed her children in sequence. That's demonstrating real time decision making. I don't understand how they circumvented this. Again, very improbable that she was able to make decisions up until it becomes a liability

4. This idea of a "voice" that commanded her is so post-hoc as a defense. The ltierature on command hallucinations show most people don't obey them and the compliance occurs when the voice is familiar. This was a first time voice she only ever reported 2 weeks after killing her kids. And this first time voice asked her to... kill all her children AND she listened to this unfamiliar voice? Again... very improbable

The improbability is so stark that it's almost undeniably a sympathy verdict from the jurors conflated with a misunderstanding of postpartum disease. The easiest way to demonstrate this is to take a father with the same chart, months of documented depression, insomnia, suicidal ideation but no psychosis then strangles his kids after arranging for his wife to be away from the house. 100% guilty.

Everyone knows postpartum disease is real and important. Everyone knows she's sick and needed help, possibly much better management. You can even argue she is insane. What I see to be the most important is where we draw the line of what we allow under the "insanity" rule. Massachusetts forces a binary verdict of guilty or not criminally responsible but this is a case for the third that other states have and which is guilty but mentally ill. We have a responsibility to speak for the unheard voices of these children and future children and say we draw the line at murdering children.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@CoffeewClassics Two Leagues Under the Sea

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@SteveBakerUSA @TalkWithSally Yes, this pair.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@otokyo White anaconda
Bare naked fat ladies

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@KyleSeraphin @TheAKGuy That’s an endorsement.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

I’ve never had a flu shot. I’ve also never had the flu.

[Alex Berenson @AlexBerenson]

From the staunchly pro-vaccine Your Local Epidemiologist Substack: “flu vaccination rates are decreasing across the country at staggering rates.”

Good.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

Hopefully medical professionals will follow suit. Restoration of public trust begins like this.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

SHOCKING CONFESSION: Former Cleveland Clinic Medical Director Dr. Daniel Neides breaks down in tears, apologizing to ALL his vaccinated patients.

"I didn’t provide informed consent…ABSOLUTELY DEPLORABLE on my part and I apologize to my patients."

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

@KanekoaTheGreat @RealCandaceO

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

You’re right. I was raised a skeptic. The terms warp speed and vaccine were incongruous. It wasn’t a traditional vaccine. Red flags. By the time the jabs were rolled out, I’d had what I believed was the Delta variant. I trusted natural immunity and was prepared to quit my job if jabs were mandated.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

😂🤣

[Tracy Beanz @tracybeanz]

🤡

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

Before and after.

[Sibyl @Sibyl09]

"And stay off email."
"Or carefully curate some emails for the FOI records."

Diabolically criminal.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

🚨NEW: Rand Paul released Slack messages showing the authors of "Proximal Origin" — the paper Fauci used to label the lab leak a "conspiracy theory" — privately turning on Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak after the DEFUSE proposal leaked.

September 21, 2021. DEFUSE surfaces: a 2018 plan to insert furin cleavage sites into SARS-like coronaviruses, submitted by Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance with Baric and Wuhan's Shi Zhengli.

SARS-CoV-2 is the only betacoronavirus that has one.

Andrew Rambaut, on Daszak and Baric:

"I would just like to discuss what our strategy should be so we don't get associated with these fuckers."

Eddie Holmes, on Daszak:

"Peter should have seen this coming and it is worse than he was suggesting a few days ago. He's a jackass."

Kristian Andersen, on Baric — who co-wrote DEFUSE, then attacked him for asking questions:

"He knew how suspicious a FCS would look back then. And his attacks on me for even suggesting we need to take a look at this. He's a two faced bastard, that's for sure."

They'd spent 18 months telling the world a lab origin wasn't credible.

Then they saw a 2018 proposal to insert a furin cleavage site into a SARS-like coronavirus, from a team that included the Wuhan lab — written a year and a half before SARS-CoV-2 emerged with one in Wuhan.

Rambaut:

"It really isn't beyond plausibility that someone went ahead and tried some of this stuff. We just need to re-convince ourselves it is coincidence."

Holmes:

"It is very striking that a bat-derived CoV with an FCS turns up in a city that was on a grant proposing to muck around with FCSs in bat-derived CoVs."

Andersen:

"This can't (shouldn't) be dismissed out of hand."

"There's a big difference between 'the lab was working on bat CoVs' to 'the lab was modifying bat CoVs using features we see being unique to SC2.'"

Then, as they split up the review, Rambaut:

"And stay off email."
"Or carefully curate some emails for the FOI records."

@RandPaul
@TulsiGabbard