@TsukinoYueVT@Kimagure31415 3D printers need high poly to print even if it's low poly artistically. It's something to do with the coordinates of printing and stuff. Otherwise you'll get a bad looking print. I know it looks like something an Ai would make but for 3D printing I've seen this before.
@HollywoodHandle To be honest it makes sense, people guessed the plot of 5 so why do it at this point? Just skip to 6, then we can try to guess the plot of that one too.
@2137Komorn8234@shitpost_2077 Good for making everyone in every country do the equation in one way to get the same answer. But it's basically preventing you from finding ALL possible answers to the same equation. Just because you see one answer doesn't necessarily make it the right one.
@GAUIMPE@shitpost_2077 The creation of PEMDAS is basically ensuring that a math problem calculated in one country is interpreted identically in another. But the universe doesn't care. What if Aliens don't use it? They can calculate all possible answers to a problem, not necessarily just get one answer
@GAUIMPE@shitpost_2077 The equations we know might look differently because the process was different. You will end up with the same results. An equation that represents something. Like Newtons law of motion might not look the same but it will still be an equation, but will look slightly different.
@cube_1224fk @Rahll@mcuban Yes but it's more of a car speedometer thing. You can go up to 140+ on a car. But we all know the speed limit is way less than that. So while you are very unlikely to need it, it would be "logical" to cap/limit the speed of all the cars in the world, it is an option everyone has.
@AnimexTwts Hunter X Hunter literally the next chapter after the ending:
"We are going to colonize the Dark continent!"
Shit was about to turn into another One Piece but there isn't enough chapters yet.
🚨🇪🇺 The European Commission is about to steal your search history in one of the largest forced data grabs in the history of the open internet, and almost nobody is talking about it.
The scope is staggering:
🔴 Every query you type
🔴 Every voice and photo search
🔴 Every autocomplete you accept
🔴 Your language, your device
🔴 Your country pinned to a ~3km² grid
🔴 Every result you saw, every link you hovered
🔴 Every click and scroll
🔴 The full chronological order of your search sessions
Meaning the European Union now knows your:
🔴 Health symptoms
🔴 Pregnancy
🔴 Sexual orientation
🔴 Political views
🔴 Religious beliefs
🔴 Financial distress
🔴 Legal trouble
🔴 Addictions
🔴 Affairs
Under the proposed measures for DMA Article 6(11), Google would be ordered to ship the daily search behaviour of hundreds of millions of Europeans to multiple third parties through a daily API feed. Any approved "online search engine," AI chatbots included, would get five years of access.
The things people only ever type when they think no one is watching. All of it now scheduled to flow daily into an open-ended list of third parties scattered across the European Union.
Brussels promises "anonymisation." The reality is a thin technical veneer that has been broken in academic literature again and again for over a decade. Search behaviour is a fingerprint. Stripping a name does not change that.
Mass data leaks become inevitable. Every new beneficiary is a new attack surface, and every annual audit is a year of silent exposure between checks. The 2025 Discord vendor breach already showed how fast 70,000 government IDs can leak through a single weak link. Now imagine that link holding Europe's search history.
Surveillance without consent becomes the default. Hundreds of millions of EU citizens never agreed to have their queries packaged and shipped to companies they have never heard of. The legal fiction of "anonymisation" cannot manufacture consent that was never given.
Behavioural search data is a goldmine for phishing, blackmail, social engineering, and corporate espionage.
Foreign intelligence services get a back door without effort. They do not need to breach Google. They only need to compromise the weakest name on the beneficiary list. One insolvent startup. One compromised contractor. One approved entity quietly acquired by a hostile state.
In the name of "competition," the EU is about to manufacture a permanent, distributed, daily-refreshed copy of Europe's collective search history. A surveillance dataset Brussels itself would never approve if any other government tried to build it.
The public consultation closes Friday, May 1, 2026 at 23:59 CEST. The final binding decision lands July 27, 2026.
After that, the door does not close again.
Tag your MEPs! File a response! Make noise!