Gauss

1

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@SignaIbat9 @shitpost_2077 Relativising outputs within that system does not free it from convention, but rather annihilates the system. There are no multiple valid answers to a properly defined operation. It would result in incoherency.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@SignaIbat9 @shitpost_2077 You are conflating mathematics as a human interpretive framework (1) by it being property of the universe itself (2). It's only the former. It is a formal system with defined operations.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@SignaIbat9 @shitpost_2077 Point 1: True in isolation.

Point 2: No. going from the post, it would either be 30 or 40.

Point 3: You are conflating notational variance with computational variance.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@SignaIbat9 @shitpost_2077 Point 1: you will get different answers.

Point 2: Different values to the same expression cannot be both valid, that would make a contradiction.

Point 3: It will. Predicted force values in multi-term expression will change.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@SignaIbat9 @shitpost_2077 "Wether it is right or wrong is subjective to what you were expecting the question to be," What?

"Math is just the process of getting to an answer, not THE answer," That collapses the formal system itself.

Your argument, if applied generally, would self-destruct.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@MilitaryCooI Slaughter of other homo sapiens turned into sensationalist entertainment. Truly, this is for the last man.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@MattDane552022 @earth_toness @kaizen000000000 Is your god benevolent? How would you know this?

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@PraxLemon @FeelsGuy2003 Also, do you really, really think that morality is something in which there can be a "final" answer or synthesis?

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@PraxLemon @FeelsGuy2003 It is pointless? How do you know that? Is the point of it to be memetically transmitted and used in some pragmatic way? Is that not a claim laden with presuppositions? You never framed this being your own view, but as empirical observations that led to this absolutist conclusion.

[Gauss @GAUIMPE]

@Hadryan505 @XinGaoY2K @Avesvery Could you solve for the Epicurean paradox without resorting to Appeal-to-mysticism?

I'd be interested in reading your thoughts here.