@searchmartin What I'm struggling with is seoClarity doesn't recognize these as a serp feature. I checked in serpapi and they call them site links. With increasing prevalence of forums I guess I need pixel depth reporting
@RyanJones This is my favorite take on the docs so far. If you work in enterprise, you often don’t know every part of a product. You sometimes don’t even know everyone working on it or even all the teams.
@iPullRank The docs screenshotted are generated by Elixir which is a lovely programming language. It treats documentation as a first class citizen and generates it for you. Woopsie.
@iPullRank Terms like "base documents" and "golden" reinforces that certain sites are selected as a baseline. Backlinks will likely always be valuable from sources like trusted news sites or wikipedia.
@iPullRank If Chrome generates a signal for it, there's clear evidence it can be used for ranking. Views, Lighthouse scores, font size etc.
Imagine your a publisher with many sites. Chrome can see shared 3rd party cookies and connect website sets together.
Going to drop thoughts here as they come to me. First, I think the acronym NSR is Name Server Rank. It could explain why sites tend to slip when they change DNS config. Google does own 8.8.8.8
@jeffrey_coyle Interesting and very rad that you’re refining those categories. Would you say search intent is defined by the searcher or the SERP?
I think there’s a lot of room to mess up getting a user what they need. Sometimes the user doesn’t know. Sometimes they ask the wrong question etc