@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein yeah and Michael is purple guy and springtrap because this is obviously what the SL custom night cutscenes show
wait, no, actually the entire series is just the bite victim's dream, bc clearly that's what FNAF 4 is about, how do you not know that smh
@XSpranp Because the games lore was and is perfectly explainable without him existing. He's first mentioned YEARS after the games he's allegedly a part of released and only in a book series with story bits that seem to parallel the games' story bits to seemingly clear up the games story
@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein the toys with the parts, general agony shenanigans, William tampering with the toys, etc.
So many different theories, but you don't know a single one and just call any assumption you have a confirmation of your theory. Whatever, bro, I'm not gonna argue anymore.
@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein There's a theory about the bodies in the minigame being from the MCI, a theory where it is DCI, but the bodies AREN'T stuffed into the animatronics, Cassidy being a member of the DCI and causing all the paranormal stuff, Charlie87, remnant from the withereds being trensfered to-
@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein Is each Nightmarionne bot possessed by individual soul? Are shadows possessed? What even is Lolbit? William could do many things besides specifically murdering and stuffing kids in animatronics. There're many explanations that don't require concepts that didn't exist back then
@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein Never been explicitly stated or shown that black eyes = possession. The toys start acting weird basically as soon as the location opens with the player character being only a second guard, the first guy complaining abt conditions, and the place being open for "a short few weeks"
@E__Offical@HamoniceYeah@sheepnstein This isn't a display of specifically the DCI possessing the toys, this is the toys just acting weird, which can be explained in a ton of different ways with the modern FNAF lore, and mind you - you originally wrote the game "says that's the case", which it still doesn't.
@sheepnstein Calling someone a larper because they don't believe a FNAF 2 theory that hasn't been relevant since the next game dropped (FNAF 3, 11 years ago) is crazy work, like, what are we even doing here
@dishieRx Honestly, when she said "ա̸̨̲͈̝̂͋̽͊̌յ̶̢̛̥͚̐̾̚բ̷̢̘̘͂ͅբ̸͈̍̅ե̴̗̼̮��̀̑̌̚͠ն̶̢̨̹̑̈́͌́͠գ̸̛̛͍̼͑͐ի̶̛̱̼̼̬̎̔̅մ̶̜͈̻̿̓̂̀͝ක̷̸̵්̡̢̫̙̞͚̯͙̝̲̩͂̑̓̄̀̀͛͘ͅය̴̜̣̪̭͌͛ක̷̴̵̵්̪͔̝̝̖̟͓͕͇̯̠̠̲̦͚̥̇̈̔̆̈́͗̒̍͐̈̽̕̕͜͝ය̴̛͍̳̏̾̿ͅො̸̗͑̈̅ක̵̵̴්̟̭̩̫͎̟̭̅̍̒͗͑̀̄͗͊͆̎̕ය̵̶̸්̞̜͙͓͈̤̬̀̏̒̊̿̓̑͘͘͝ ", it really made me start thinking