Anti-Dadjjal

UAD-United Against Dadjjal| Set aside minor differences and be UAD|🍉Pro-Resistance since ’97 | ✊🏽 Truth-seaker |Conspiracy realist | Silence = complicity

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

This is my post!

It's got the feelings I wanted to share but couldn't find the words for before.

[Abdullahi @trappo0593]

Without the Wahhabis, Islam was peak. Islam was feared. Islam was the strongest force on earth.
When Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama‘ah the Ash‘ari /Maturidi Sufis were the actual custodians of the deen, the controllers of Mecca and Medina, and the backbone of the major Muslim powers, the Ummah was at its golden age. Not some “cultural weirdo” version. The real thing.
Salahuddin al-Ayyubi didn’t need Wahhabi takfir manuals to liberate Jerusalem. He crushed the Crusaders, made Europe tremble, and did it as a Sunni Ash‘ari with Sufi leanings. Muhammad al-Fatih didn’t wait for a Najdi scholar to give him permission to open Constantinople. He conquered the city that the Prophet ﷺ himself spoke about, and he did it under the banner of traditional Sunni Islam. The Ottomans — Hanafi, with Ash‘ari and Maturidi scholarship, full of Sufi orders — pushed into Europe, reached the gates of Vienna twice, held Spain for centuries under the banner of Sunni Islam, and expanded the domain of Tawheed across continents. From the Balkans to the gates of Vienna, from Al-Andalus deep into the Iberian Peninsula, Islam was advancing, not apologizing.
That was Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama‘ah in charge. That was when the shrines of the Awliya’ were honored, when the madhhabs were followed, when the Ummah was united under strong Sunni empires instead of fractured by 18th-century Najdi ideology. The golden age wasn’t built by people who treat every Sufi practice as shirk and every historical Muslim ruler before them as deviant. It was built by the very tradition your side spent generations attacking.
Now look at what came after the Wahhabi movement gained power. Internal fitna, destruction of Muslim heritage, endless takfir against fellow Muslims, alliances that divided the Ummah, and a version of “Islam” that became obsessed with policing other Muslims instead of expanding the territory of Tawheed. The same movement that claims it “normalized” Islam is the one that spent decades tearing down the very scholarly and spiritual tradition that produced the strongest Muslim states in history.
If that Ash‘ari Sufi Ahlus Sunnah tradition had remained dominant instead of being sidelined and demonized, the trajectory doesn’t stay at Vienna. It doesn’t stop at the Balkans. The same force that took Constantinople and reached the heart of Europe doesn’t suddenly become weak. London falls. Moscow falls. The majority of the map stays under Muslim rule because the Ummah stays united, feared, and expanding under the real custodians of the deen — not under a later movement that redefined orthodoxy to exclude most of Islamic history.
The Wahhabis didn’t save Islam from becoming “weird.” They corrupted the living tradition of Ahlus Sunnah, replaced it with a rigid, late innovation, and then called everyone else the problem. History shows the opposite of what you’re saying. The strongest Islam the world ever saw was the one before your movement took over.
Make Sufi great again. Return the deen to the people who actually built its golden age.
Allahu Akbar.

[infostormer @kittenstormer]

The jews are such a wretched and demonic race that Israel, the so-called one and only jewish state, has quickly become the most hated entity on the planet.

The world must come together to solve the jewish problem once and for all.

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

Israel is a satanic entity and Zionism is a satanic cult.

[☀️👀 @zei_squirrel]

today is the two year anniversary of Yahya Sinwar's martyrdom. The genocidal Israeli death-cult was so idiotic that they thought releasing the footage of him fighting them until his last breath made him look bad. Instead it immortalized him.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

It’s a real bummer to see how off-track these folks are. By thinking this way, they end up being more annoying than the zionists.

Such a waste of human potential!

[Zack Ozbro 🇦🇺🤝🇵🇸 @ZackOzbro]

Sunni: “The Zionists are heinous criminals… but they come nowhere near to what Iran has done.”

Sunni powers are so terrified of Israel that they need to inflate the Iranian threat to justify selling out the Palestinian cause.

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

☢️ Why is the US running a MOAB PSYOP on Iran? /📄

It's very rare to hear the US media speak about specific munitions. If they ever talk about war, it's usually about delivery systems such as F-22s and B-2 which excite the laymen. Never munitions.

Yet, all over the news, almost in unison, everyone is now talking about MOABs with regard to Iran. Even Trump! In an interview Trump stated, in short that:

1. He may have to use a MOAB.
2. America is strong, doesn't need to use a nuke.
3. MOAB is totally conventional and definite not a nuke.
4. ... It's like a tiny nuke. (his words)

Why is the sitting president of the most powerful country in the world talking about munitions and what brought it up in the first place?

The MOAB is an extremely impractical weapon. It requires a complicated parachute/cradle/separation system that is normally used to deploy armoured vehicles into battlefields, which is why the only aircraft capable of deploying it is the C-130. Flying such a large and slow airplane into Iran is a suicide mission. Doing it to drop the equivalent of 20 Mk84s. It's never going to happen.

Why would they even bother? Three F-15s can carry 21 Mk84s and the area of damage that can be created by those bombs can be far more damaging than the ~10 tons of a MOAB.

It's obviously a cover for a nuclear strike.

The majority of people around the world are barely sentient enough to breathe. Even without Trump prompting them, the moment they see a mushroom cloud and all the signs of a nuclear attack, they fall back to the regular pre-programmed excuses:

1. It's a MOAB (their favorite one).
2. It's an ammo dump (even on open ground or high in the sky)
3. It's thermobaric (they're unaware of how these look like or how small these bombs are despite plenty of footage online)
4. They would tell us if nukes are used, the camera man's eyes would melt like in the movies, and plenty of other ret*rded nonsense.

But let's skip these idiots, nothing will convince them, not even being mortally wounded by a nuclear strike. Let's talk about why Trump is doing this and the consequences, if Iran doesn't chicken out as I sadly expect it to.

The purpose of the coming nuclear strike on Iran isn't to take out Pickaxe mountain but to take out critical infrastructure. To destroy Iran itself. Nothing Trump has done so far has achieved this. Almost all bombed targets were repaired quickly with spare parts. There's a precedent for this: WWII Germany, whose industrial capacity increased despite allied strategic bombing.

Here's how it works: A cruise missile of a 2000 pound bomb can damage certain sensitive sites, destroy civilian cement structures or kill people. But it cannot dent a large industrial facility. You can do the math and calculate the over pressure. Bombs have kill mechanisms that either work by distributing shrapnel or using the blast damage of the high explosive mixture inside. Neither of which are effective against heavy industry.

Not convinced? Remember Azovstal heavy ironworks in Ukraine, Mariupol? Despite weeks of bombardment by Russia, including the deployment of 3 ton bombs (comparable to the MOAB), the facility wasn't even scratched.

In contrast, a carefully calibrated nuclear air burst can flatten whatever infrastructure is below it. There will be nothing left to save or repair. Just debris where a factory or industrial facility was.

This is the only way the Americans now believe they can bring Iran to heel. By doing this attack sequence once (destroying something inside Iran, likely insignificant), showing that:

* Iran is too chicken sh*t to announce it was struck by a nuclear weapon (a catastrophic position to be in if one doesn't have the ability or will to retaliate, just announcing it can cause a state to collapse).
* The world will remain silent as it has with all previous nuclear strikes, especially the most recent one on Syria which has been proven to be nuclear beyond any reasonable doubt (down to radioactive soil samples).
* The American public is so dumbed down that they'll buy the MOAB cover without question.
* The attack can be repeated as many times as necessary to get Iran to surrender.

In short, these nuclear strikes will be demonstration or de-escalation strikes. Meant to stop the war by demonstrating a lack of ability or will on one party's behalf.

If this sounds insane, consider what is at stake. The US's allies in the region have been disrupted to such a degree that there is hardly any oil export coming out of the middle east. The world is living off strategic petroleum reserves which as rapidly being drained. There's no time left. Iran either opens the Hormuz or the world suffers the most catastrophic energy and food crisis in history -- and everyone will blame Israel and the US.

The fall out would be worse than a nuclear war. We are talking mass starvation, and the complete absence of fuel for billions and billions of people. The death toll will be in the same unit as that you expect from a nuclear war: megadeaths. So the closure of the Hormuz has crossed into that threshold.

Can Iran stop this from unfolding? Perhaps. One strategy is to call out the PSYOP -- but I don't expect them to do this. They have carried out clandestine attacks of their own and keeping the public ignorant about limited nuclear warfare is in the interest of every nuclear state including Iran.

An alternative is to preemptively carry out an attack of its own, targeting the very infrastructure required to carry out the nuclear attack. This would not only directly stop the attack, but it will also demonstrate the will necessary to fight the coming nuclear war.

/End

P.S. I fully expect the US to transition to talking up the MOP and B-2 again after enough people realise the MOAB is not deployable over Iran. It's the same BS with another munition.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

A country like Afghanistan, which faced an economy on the brink of collapse just a few years ago, using this kind of approach suggests that taxes in the U.S. and other nations are really just a way to drain your resources.

[Mahfil @mahfildijital]

🔴 Afgan bakan Şeyh Muhammed Nedim, binde 3 olan gelir vergisini tamamen kaldırmak için halktan süre istedi:

"Ülkenin tüm harcamaları madenlerden, sanayiden ve ticaretten karşılandığı takdirde her türlü vergiyi kaldıracağız."

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

One of the most toxic and damaging beliefs a Muslim can have today is this:

Shia are a bigger enemy to Sunnis than Israel and US invaders.

What is the origin of this belief?

Obviously, this belief serves the interests of Zionism and continued US occupation and suppression of Muslim lands. But few realize the origins of this doctrine.

***The reality is no Sunni religious authority historically has ever advocated this doctrine.

Literally ZERO Sunni scholars have said: The Shia are a bigger enemy and danger to Sunnis than the disbelievers, and if the disbelievers are attacking Muslims, Sunnis should still prioritize fighting the Shia.

So then, who originated this doctrine?

It was Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The founder of ISIS.

He is the first one to propagate this new doctrine.

Since 2004, he told his Wahhabi followers to stop fighting against the US occupation in Iraq and instead focus entirely on the "near enemy" i.e., the Shia of Iraq.

He articulated this doctrine in a 2004 letter to Alqaeda trying to convince them to accept the doctrine (they refused).

Zarqawi also gave a lengthy elaboration of the doctrine in a sermon titled Hal ataka hadith al-rafidha (“Has Word of the Rafidha Reached You?”)

How did he justify this new doctrine given that the Quran and Sunna teach Muslims the exact opposite, namely to ally together against kafir invaders?

Zarqawi devotes much of the sermon to takfiring (excommunicating) Shia as being kafir. He cites different Sunni authorities on this.

But takfiring Shia does not actually mean that they are bigger enemies than kafir invaders. How does Zarqawi justify *that*?

In fact, Ibn Taymiyya, a major authority for Wahhabis, says the opposite, namely that Shia, though deviant Muslims, are preferable to Jews, Christians, and other disbelievers (Majmu' al-Fatawa).

Zarqawi does not have anything to cite from Quran, Sunna, or the statement of the Sunni scholarly tradition.

So he gives a historical "evidence."

As any knowledgeable Muslim will tell you, historical examples cannot be used as evidence for legal rulings, especially when they contradict established principles from the Quran and Sunna.

Nonetheless, the founder of ISIS claims that his doctrine is justified because it was also the doctrine of 12th century Muslim hero, Salahaddin.

Zarqawi claims that Salahaddin ignored the Christian Crusaders to fight against the Shii Fatimids.

This precedent from Salahaddin, he claims, justifies his doctrine to focus on killing Shia and ignoring the US invasion.

The problem is that this was not actually Salahaddin's policy. No where does Salahaddin express this doctrine (despite the existence of fabricated quotes spread by ISIS).

Furthermore Salahaddin did not actually focus on Shia to the exclusion of Crusaders. The actual history shows that Salahaddin fought many Shia and Sunni factions as well as Crusaders in a mixed series of confrontations. Salahaddin also was pragmatic with the Shia in some instances.

So the one historical example Zarqawi invokes to justify his new doctrine is a fabrication.

But unfortunately ISIS fanboys have spent the past 20 years spreading these lies and Zarqawi's deviant doctrine.

Today, many Wahhabis who otherwise nominally denounce ISIS still promote and champion the doctrine invented by the founder of ISIS.

Ahmad Sharaa (Goylani) and his supporters also promote this ISIS doctrine despite being opposed to ISIS.

In English, it is speakers like Rabbi Faris Hammadi, Adnan Rajeet, Farid Bahraini, Ali Dawah, Mufti Dubai bin Cholo who promote this ISIS doctrine to trick Sunnis.

Sunnis need to realize that this doctrine is deviant. It has nothing to do with Sunnism. It was invented by ISIS's founder and boosted by the CIA and Mossad. Even Alqaeda rejected it.

Wake up.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

A brand new hero has emerged!

[Rabbi Jeff @RabbiJeffx]

IDF renovations for Jared Kushner’s “Gaza Riviera” have just started in Rafah.

Concrete mixed with the ashes of incinerated Palestinian children.

[Saleem Afridi @SaleemAfridii]

بلوچستان کی اس لاش کو دیکھ کر دل کانپ اٹھتا ہے۔
یہ منظر صرف ایک انسان کی موت نہیں، بلکہ ایک ایسے درد کی داستان ہے جو برسوں سے جاری ہے۔ ایسی بے شمار لاشیں ملتی رہی ہیں جن کے بندھے ہوئے ہاتھ پاؤں اور بے بسی بہت سے سوال چھوڑ جاتے ہیں، اور ہر سوال ایک ماں، ایک بہن اور ایک خاندان کے نہ ختم ہونے والے غم کی یاد دلاتا ہے۔
ہر انسان کو جینے، آزادی اور انصاف کا حق حاصل ہے۔ جبری گمشدگیاں، تشدد اور ماورائے عدالت قتل کسی بھی معاشرے کے لیے ایک گہرا المیہ ہیں۔
اسی طرح جب بھی کسی بھی خطے میں عام شہری خوف، عدم تحفظ اور جان و مال کے خطرات میں زندگی گزارنے پر مجبور ہوں، تو یہ پوری انسانیت کے لیے باعثِ تشویش ہونا چاہیے۔
ہم عالمی برادری اور متعلقہ اداروں سے مطالبہ کرتے ہیں کہ انسانی جان کے تحفظ، انصاف کی فراہمی اور جبری گمشدگیوں سمیت تمام انسانی حقوق کی خلاف ورزیوں کی آزادانہ اور شفاف تحقیقات کو یقینی بنایا جائے تاکہ متاثرہ خاندانوں کو انصاف مل سکے اور ایسے سانحات دوبارہ جنم نہ لیں۔

#SaveBalochistan #StopBalochGenocide #EndEnforcedDisappearances #ReleaseBYCleaders

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

@cirnosad Because it's designed as a penetrator, there’s no radiation leakage, and they can easily get away with it.

They've already gotten away with it 100 times.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

@parimoosh I consider dying.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

So, it must be fusion based tactical nukes, then.

[Jawad @levantupdates]

Regarding the MOAB (mother of all bombs) threat on pickaxe mountain.

It can only be dropped from a Hercules C-130 a transport plane with a max ceiling of 33,000 feet that is going to have to fly directly 565 KM DIRECTLY into Iranian airspace either hugging a mountain peak or across the Persian gulf without being shot down to drop the MOAB which is a dummy bomb and can’t be guided while at the same time traveling another 565 KM and refueling somewhere over Iranian airspace without being shot down.

If you read this scenario and think it’s logically possible, then you deserve every participation trophy ever handed out for being that confidently stupid.

[Брат Иоанн ☦ 🇷🇺 @Orthodoxe]

What Ilham Aliyev will never publicly admit is that his family came to power through the will of Iossif Stalin.

Stalin, who was Georgian, was openly Iranophobic. Not only did he consider (before abandoning the idea) seizing southern Azerbaijan from Iran, but he also expelled the Persian-speaking Shiites from Dagestan (who had once been the majority) to replace them with Sunnis, and even created a new Sunni capital for Dagestan, Makhachkala, in place of Shiite Derbent.
Similarly, in Arran (northern Azerbaijan), where Persian-speaking Azerbaijanis remained numerous and held power, he expelled them to Iran (southern Azerbaijan) and installed more Turkic-speaking people there, including the Aliyev family. The Aliyevs became a dynasty of tyrants by Stalin's will and no other. Turkey played no role.

[Daily Islamist @dailyislamist]

🗣️ Dünya Müslüman Alimler Birliği Genel Sekreteri Muhammed Ali es-Sallabî:

“Sayın Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’a..

Sen, Azerbaycan’ın en karanlık günlerinde yanında duran liderdin. Silah depolarını ve insansız hava araçlarını Azerbaycan’ın hizmetine sundun, askerî danışmanlar gönderdin.

Ermenistan’a ve tüm dünyaya karşı dimdik durarak Karabağ’ın kurtuluşu için “Azerbaycan yalnız değildir!” dedin.

Biz Müslümanlar olarak seni alkışladık. İlham Aliyev’in zaferini hepimizin zaferi olarak gördük.

Ancak bugün her Müslüman erkeğin ve kadının yüreğini sızlatan bir soru var: Müttefikin İlham Aliyev, kendi ülkesinde ne yapıyor?

İslam ve Türk kardeşliği adına desteklediğin müttefikin, bugün Azerbaycan’da kızlarımızın başörtüleriyle okullara ve üniversitelere girmesini engelliyor.

Kız öğrenciler sırf “Rabbim bana bunu emretti” dediği için okula alınmıyor.

Sayın Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan,

Sen, Türkiye’de başörtülü kızların eğitim hakkı için yıllarca mücadele ettin. Üniversitelerdeki başörtüsü yasağını kaldıran lider oldun.

Peki, bugün sizin insansız hava araçlarınızla güçlenen müttefikin tarafından aynı başörtüsünün baskı altına alınmasına nasıl razı olabilirsin?

Birlikte inşa ettiğiniz güçlü Azerbaycan, Müslüman kadınlara baskı uygulayan bir güce dönüşmemelidir.

Sana kardeşlik adına, bugün okulunun kapısında gözyaşı döken her Azerbaycanlı kız öğrenci adına sesleniyoruz:

İlham Aliyev üzerindeki büyük etkinliği ve nüfuzunu kullanarak ona şu sözleri söylemeni istiyoruz:

“Müslümanların kızlarından elinizi çekin!”

Çünkü Bakü’de başörtüsü mücadelesini kaybedersek, Karabağ zaferi de gerçek anlamda tamamlanmış olmayacaktır.

Allah’ım, sen şahit ol! Ben üzerime düşen tebliğ görevini yerine getirdim.”

[Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚 @hippyygoat]

What you are seeing in the sky are the bodies of women and children.

[Megatron @Megatron_ron]

NEW: 🇪🇬🇮🇱 Egyptian President el-Sisi defends Netanyahu and Israel:

“Netanyahu is responsible for his country, and he knows very well that Egypt will never pose a threat.

Once, he asked me, "Why are you arming yourself?" He asked me that question. He said, "Why are you buying weapons?"

I told him, "I have never seen Israel's strength as a threat to me, and I believe you also need to deal with us on the basis that Egypt's strength is not a threat to you."

[Fabio Silva @NoManland667]

Some Arabs don’t like Iran, because Iran is everything you should have been.

Iran is currently kicking the empire’s ass. You’re the ones getting your asses kicked by it.

While you roll out the red carpet for the Americans and secretly meet the Zionists in Abu Dhabi, you pay with Mastercard, Iran pays with the Khorramshahr-4.

Iran destroys 14 American bases in the region, Iran destroys AWACS, Iran shoots down F-15s, they fire on Tel Aviv and Haifa.

You do nothing, not even a single 9mm shot. It eats you up inside, you feel humiliated.

So you invent theories that Iran is secretly working with the Mossad. That’s projection, it’s you who are secretly working with the Mossad.

Take part in the struggle instead of staying in this resentful mindset.

We see you secretly supporting the American and Zionist bombings of Iran.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

@cirnosad This guy, maybe a CIA agent, blocked me for saying this.

[Anti-Dadjjal @Simianizer]

This is utterly vile—so much so that even Satan would hesitate. Muslims should consider boycotting Hajj for the unity of Islam and the Ummah.

[Mohamed Almutawakkil @Almutawakkil_YE]

If Yemen supposedly targets Makkah and Madinah, why is the Saudi regime moving its aircraft to these very cities, relying on Sana’a’s official declaration that they and their airports and facilities are safe?

Reports by The Wall Street Journal and aviation media say Saudi airlines moved aircraft from Riyadh to Madinah, Jeddah and AlUla amid security threats, with the number of aircraft in Riyadh reportedly dropping from 134 to 38.

They accuse Yemen of threatening the two holy cities, yet exploit Yemen’s religious and moral restraint to shelter their most valuable assets. Yemen upholds a principle, they exploit its decency. A disgraceful contradiction that exposes the hypocrisy of their narrative.