With due respect Honourable Senator Coltart, invariably and self-righteously if not arrogantly labelling all views contrary to yours as "NONSENSE"; flies in the face of your political experience, status as the Mayor of Bulawayo and professional background as a senior member of the bar. You can and should do better. Have a good day!
Hon C. Madzivanyika was clearly answered yesterday by Hon. Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi on the constitutional requirements for amendments and when a referendum is necessary.
"The Constitution is very clear on what to do when we're amending. There is very clear statement on when a referendum is required."
The Minister's response left no ambiguity: the Constitution itself provides the framework for amendments and explicitly outlines the circumstances under which a referendum is required. Constitutional processes must be guided by the provisions of the Constitution, not by political interpretations or speculation.
@ZiyambiZ@cmadziva1@ProfJNMoyo
Hon. Webster Shamu (MP, Chegutu East) denounced foreign sanctions and regime-change agendas, stating Zimbabwe rejects outside lectures on democracy. He affirmed that CA3 represents an authentic, homegrown, and people-driven democracy backed by the nation.
But Mfowethu, you cannot say all this as some political narrative, without reference to the relevant and binding text of the Constitution. What section of the fundamental law of the land mandates a referendum, and for which clause or clauses of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No.3) H.B.1. Bill, 2026?
CA3 doesn't abolish "one man, one vote"—it honors it.
The liberation struggle was fought for equal voting rights for all. CA3 reinforces this by moving the presidential choice to a parliamentary vote, ensuring your voice is fully represented through the leaders you elect.
The liberation struggle was fought to guarantee equal voting rights for all. CA3 reinforces this by moving the presidential choice to a parliamentary vote, ensuring your voice is fully represented through the leaders you elect.
Important distinction on the CA3 Bill:
⚠️ Term Length ≠ Term Limits.
Changing an election cycle from 5 to 7 years alters the duration of a term, not the two-term cap itself. Since the actual limit remains untouched, a national referendum isn’t legally triggered.
Clauses 5 and 6 eliminate the hierarchical distinction between the Vice Presidents, establishing them as equals. Furthermore, these clauses codify a clear succession plan in the event the President vacates office prior to the expiration of their term.
@DavidColtart I think you are now putting words in her mouth; you know very well she was referring to the country. If you have something to say, be bold enough to say it without misquoting someone else
@namataik_ We sometimes forget that some of the very clauses in CA3 were first suggested by members of the opposition and were applauded as being progressive changes to the constitution but it seems to not be well received when its not @BitiTendai or @ProfMadhuku proposing them.
Hon. Susan Matsunga has chosen to build her country, and through her submissions on #CA3, it shows a genuine opposition leader who is open to uniting with the ruling party on matters that unite the nation.
Masiphambane sakhe izwe lethu!
@ProfJNMoyo@KMutisi@Bete263@chrissy10charu@CMukungunugwa
@ChangeRadioZW Bipartisan creation is not the measure of the usefulness of a constitution. I also find it shocking that she didn't find anything useful in CA3. Clearly, she is there putting party politics and sound bites ahead of national interests.
@NewsHawksLive@DavidColtart You know somebody is not applying their mind to CA3 when they can read it and reject it in its entirety. Even the defense forces amendment is unacceptable to her?
And using your own logic, Honourable Coltart, in terms of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013), can judges be members of the legislature - like at least the 18 traditional leaders in the Senate - where they can sit, speak and vote? The answer is no, so keep judges out of this. Meanwhile, if it's ok for traditional leaders to do politics in Parliament as Senators, why is it not ok for them to do the same back home in their communal lands; when they're with the people they represent, as MPs?
#CA3 proposes a parliamentary presidential election system designed to strengthen consensus, stability, and institutional governance in Zimbabwe 🇿🇼
Under Clause 3, the President would be elected by a joint sitting of Parliament , bringing together both the National Assembly and Senate, with each Member of Parliament casting one vote.
The proposed system is built around majority support, accountability, and representation: ✔️ A candidate must secure more than 50% of the vote
✔️ Run-off procedures apply where necessary
✔️ Oversight mechanisms help ensure fairness and transparency
Supporters of the proposal argue that this model: • Encourages cooperation across political lines
• Reduces the financial burden of repeated direct presidential elections
• Strengthens Parliament as the voice of the people
• Promotes continuity, stability, and national unity
• Supports long-term governance and development planning
Parliamentary presidential election systems are not new globally. Countries such as South Africa and Botswana have long used parliamentary-based presidential selection systems within their democratic frameworks.
At its core, CA3 supporters believe the amendment is about building stronger institutions, reducing political polarization, and creating governance systems focused on stability, dialogue, and national progress.
A stronger Parliament. A more stable Zimbabwe. A future built on unity and long-term development.
#CA3 #Zimbabwe #Governance #Parliament #Democracy #Vision2030 #YourVoiceCounts