Divyaveer Singh Palawat

One of those guys who can make a party just by leaving it.

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@MeghUpdates https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@DeepikaBhardwaj Necessary context
https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@nitinmeshram_ Necessary context
https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@NewsAlgebraIND Context
https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@IndianTechGuide Necessary context
https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@scribe_it https://t.co/mKstVNyBUz

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Adv. Shashank Ratnoo @ShashankRatnoo]

Myths about yesterday's hearing.

I was the advocate in the matter, and much of the discussion on X has completely misinterpreted what was argued and what the Court observed.

• This case concerned the OBC creamy layer in Karnataka. It was not a case about SC/ST reservations.

• The judge's observation was broadly along the lines of: "Should the children of IAS officers continue to receive reservation benefits?"

• Even today, children of IAS officers are excluded from OBC reservation benefits under the creamy layer framework.

• Their exclusion is based primarily on status and position, not on salary.

• Importantly, in the present case that I represented, the petitioner's parents were Group C employees working as primary school teachers not IAS officers or holders of any high constitutional or executive office.

• We were successful in securing the issuance of notice by the Court. So far, the matter has proceeded positively.

@nethrapal @yashoazad @TinyDhillon @Profdilipmandal @nitinmeshram_ @Prksh_Ambedkar @DeepikaBhardwaj @Dr_Uditraj @RShivshankar

[Dr. Mayank Meena @MayankM005168]

Hey @amazonIN @AmazonHelp @amazon. I just received an order of Action camera Insta 360x5 and surprisingly I found that whole camera is missing and box is filled with Iron articles. By luck- I recorded whole scenario. @jagograhakjago @nch1915 @GoI_MeitY @aajtak @ndtv @ndtvindia

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@LDEDDIPER2 Sure Preet, they don’t have a favourite, they love both of you equally. No need to be paranoid. They love both of you equally.

[Frankie Boyle Updates @frankieboyle]

The ideal end to that World Cup group is Scotland scoring a last minute equaliser against England that sends them both out

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

The problem with pissing on Margaret Thatcher’s grave, is that you eventually run out of piss.

[Deccan Herald @DeccanHerald]

#DHSpeakOut |

#Congress #RahulGandhi #Goa #GoaElections2022 #AssemblyElections2022

Read: https://t.co/StqZGBRgyY

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@anjaliidk Please, could you not, I don’t want to be reminded of these things.

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@modianiruddh Lmao 😭

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@elfonac1d this sounds like you learnt that the hard way.

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@anjaliidk These are like excerpts from a conversation I must’ve had when i was twelve.

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@CentecIan @FrenchHist @militaryhistori Indochina's troops or Chinese workers hired in the French factories. The disease spread in three waves from April 1918 to February 1919."

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@CentecIan @FrenchHist @militaryhistori onary Forces, to other US Army camps and Europe, becoming an epidemic in the Midwest, East Coast, and French ports by April 1918"

The virus allegedly came from the United States of America with the American forces which landed in the western harbours of France and probably with-

[Divyaveer Singh Palawat @SinghDivyaveer]

@anjaliidk Everyone when it's after eight.