fun to ask Fox News people including G. Gutfeld to take polygraphs to determine if they're lying to Fox viewers. how many do you think would say, "Sure! Happy to take a polygraph."
@RichardGrenell Artists are not slaves. Free speech means that you don't have to support speech that you disagree with. Or at least that's the excuse people like you use when you allow public businesses to refuse service to gay people out of pure hate alone.
@evitaduffy_1 Entitled princess says what?
If you had arrived the recomened 2 hours early like everyone else does, then this wouldn't have been a problem.
If you had gone through the scanner (which does NOT produce dangerous ionizing radiation), then this wouldn't have been a problem.
@drodvik52@evitaduffy_1 The body scanners give off radiation, but it's non-ionizing. They use mm-waves, the same stuff you're exposed to every day by cellphones and cell towers.
@gtlpguanthwei@evitaduffy_1 Cosmic radiation, nasty stuff. Still, a 7 hour flight is only the equivalent of a chest X-ray.
You don't receive any ionizing radiation from the body scanners though, it's all mm-wave.
@brittgirl49@cturnbull1968@evitaduffy_1 The body scanners use non-ionizing radiation, mm-waves to be more exact. You're exposed to the same stuff every day from cellphones and cell towers. Non-ionizing radiation is safe, it's ionizing radiation that you have to be a little careful about (such as X-rays).
We love our Marines and owe a debt of gratitude to Camp Pendleton, but next time, the Vice President and the White House shouldn’t be so reckless with people’s lives for their vanity projects.
https://t.co/vQ3epSTvyh
@trooper865@MeriwetherFarms@POTUS Another appropriate quote.
"the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"
-Einstein
I don’t quote MTG often, but… “Not a single Republican in leadership… has given us a plan to help Americans deal with their health insurance premiums DOUBLING!!!”
Its propaganda. You don't release evidence publicly, let alone declare someone guilty prior to a trial. You also do not refer to any of this as proof. This is evidence, the "proof" part comes during a trial.
This all undermines the Judicial process, removes the presumption of innocence, and could taint the jury.
Releasing infoin this manner is a really good way to undermine any case you have against someone.
Gabbard is relying on most people believing what she says these docs mean instead of people actually reading them.
Take the claim of a "secret" meeting on Dec 9th. That meeting wasn't secret, Obama and others have talked about it and it's it's actually detailed in Jon Lovett's book.
None of this is new evidence, but Gabbard's spin on it certainly is.
Keep in mind that Gabbard's new narrative is a 180 from everything she expressed when she was on Joe Rogan in 2018 where she herself acknowledged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
https://t.co/JOwSb6QVim
@DNIGabbard@realDonaldTrump@HouseIntel Sure Jan... 🙄
Just keep putting out more of this nonsense in order to distract everyone from the fact that the Republican party is actively protecting pedophiles. It's not like you have a real job to do or anything.