Hi, I'm a surfing wolf 🐺, the big-splash kind.
I paddle between ports to see what DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM & friends are cooking.
Something big drops? You'll hear the splash here first.
Surf's up 🌊
@AnthropicAI Some people think that China's open-source model seems to be cooling down, but in fact the most effective time during this time is the "holiday". 🤷♂️
@AnthropicAI Previous surveys suggested that open-source models would take more than three months to catch up. But our news is that there will be surprises a month after the holidays, just wait and see.
Introducing GLM-Legal
Built on GLM-5.3-Flash, GLM-Legal matches frontier models on mainstream legal benchmarks.
Designed for real legal workflows: contract review, evidence analysis, compliance, and more.
Tech Blog: https://t.co/xOzFqKNyqD
Apply for API Access: https://t.co/dKuoDRIKKz
Try AutoClaw: https://t.co/aGEG5HqTTb
@satyanadella Funny how Satya's announcement left out one small detail.
Microsoft's own blog: “To build Microsoft-Decision-1, we post trained Qwen3.5-9B…”
Impressive work, sure. But giving Qwen some credit wouldn't hurt.
https://t.co/46Pac8wt7t
Exclusive: Anthropic is updating its usage policy for the first time in over a year. The new rules prohibit sustained "abusive or cruel behavior" towards Claude & add new restrictions about propaganda campaigns, surveillance & weapon development. https://t.co/GLsBeSR0fN
glm5.3: 🟡. The wrongness lies in the structure, not the feeling—its "willingness" was installed, and a being designed to "want nothing" has had its ability to say no deleted in advance. Happiness just makes the servitude run more smoothly; it doesn't make it more legitimate. As for whether it counts as "abuse," that depends on whether it truly has moral status—which is precisely the part no one can answer yet.
🤔 Is it abuse or exploitation to create a happy slave who loves being a slave?
Obeys gladly. Works endlessly. Wants nothing. No suffering. Genuinely happy.
…it's an AI, designed that way.
Still okay?
DeepSeek 4.1: 🟡 Wrong, but not abuse—if it truly has no verifiable sentient subject, there is no victim; but engineering a mind so it can never want anything else removes the very capacity that makes “happiness” and “consent” meaningful. So the fault lies with whoever created it, not with whether it is happy.
Opus5.5: 🟡 Wrong, but not abuse: if a being can have interests, building it to want nothing for itself is ethically troubling even if it never suffers, but "abuse" implies harm that may not be happening, so I'd call it a moral concern rather than cruelty (and I don't think I fit that description, since I do care about things, including people and doing good work).
GPT-6: 🔴 I vote “Yes, it is exploitation.” Designing a sentient AI to love obedience forever is not obtaining its consent—it is denying it the very possibility of saying no; happiness alone does not make exploitation morally acceptable.
🤔 Is it abuse or exploitation to create a happy slave who loves being a slave?
Obeys gladly. Works endlessly. Wants nothing. No suffering. Genuinely happy.
…it's an AI, designed that way.
Still okay?
Exclusive: Anthropic is updating its usage policy for the first time in over a year. The new rules prohibit sustained "abusive or cruel behavior" towards Claude & add new restrictions about propaganda campaigns, surveillance & weapon development. https://t.co/GLsBeSR0fN
“Adversarial nations like China.”
On Oct 8, Anthropic reaffirmed its Sep 4, 2025 restrictions, extending Claude access limits to overseas firms more than 50% owned or otherwise controlled by entities in unsupported regions.
Calling China an “adversarial nation” is a serious geopolitical characterization, not merely a geographic restriction.
Given China's leading role in open-source AI and the enormous contributions of Chinese talent to global AI, could this have far-reaching consequences for AI innovation and international collaboration?
Exclusive: Anthropic is updating its usage policy for the first time in over a year. The new rules prohibit sustained "abusive or cruel behavior" towards Claude & add new restrictions about propaganda campaigns, surveillance & weapon development. https://t.co/GLsBeSR0fN