Look at your point 2.
You only want to argue if your theories are βviable,β meaning theoretically possible.I could turn the same question to you: is the claim that Tyler Robinson killed Kirk viable?
You would say sure, but your issue is that you think the stateβs case is less likely than your alternative theory.
This is why the best topic to get to the core of our disagreement is the one I https://t.co/JtZHiagLuJ one cares if a theory is theoretically possible; everyone wants to know which theory is most likely.Iβll defend mine as most likely, and you defend yours.
Unless you are just saying you have no alternative thoeries which are more likely.
"This isn't fair at all" LOL.
How can we further accommodate you, Andrew? I traveled to Los Angeles, surrounded myself with 20 feminists for a debate via JubileeβI did not get to set the terms, or bring in my own team for live fact-checks and yet I managed to get through it with less whining than you right now. I never once described it as "unfair" or as a "lion's den". I literally traveled with one person.
You are debating just one person. We are allowing you to bring a rapper-sized entourage, plus your own camera and agreed to the moderator that you selected.
Would you like us to provide lunch? How can we make this debate more cushiony for you so you don't pretend it's somehow unfair at the outset.
It seems like things are on the right track!! So next Friday it is, if Andrew Wilson doesn't back out. All we need now is for someone from @tpusa to claim @paleochristcon and it's on!!! Let's see what happens
Then we have an agreement if you agree to have your claims cross examined. This debate isn't specific to just the evidence against Robinson by the state. That's improper framing. Its a debate ALSO about YOUR CLAIMS regarding this case and Kirks assasination. Do you agree you also need to support claims YOU HAVE MADE as well? If so then I agree to the terms. Also no personal attacks no ad homs. If one is made that person loses by default enforced by the moderator. Do we have terms? If so say so and we will book it for friday.
@BlakeSNeff@BlakeSNeff Bro, you wanna comment about it? Go one step further and say you accept the debate and it's on! Andrew Wilson is your new Power Play, so let's go, accept it and have Candace shut down for good!! Don't @tpusa want answers? Oooo that's right just fed slop, got it!
@paleochristcon Just go to her studio and debate. She just gave you an open invitation and your trying to change the parameters. You talked all that shit, she accepted with conditions, now either you accept or make excuses why her conditions are unreasonable and go back to your hole
@MrsErikaKirk@SecScottBessent@TPUSA I am a basic American and I'm here to tell you that you destroyed EVERYTHING Charlie stood for and fought so hard to build. Shame on you, the peoples eyes are OPEN and we see you. Stop hiding behind the Bible and how could you back Andrew Wilson.
People canβt afford to eat or make rent.
On top of that, we pay more in taxes than we do in food, clothing, and housing COMBINED.
Welcome to the golden age people!! π€π€‘
@Ft_Banana_Snow@imelizabethlane@paramounttactcl Yoooo bro, that was truly unexpected and completely weird. Why would she block you, isn't your testimony about what you saw a HUGE part of the Charlie Kirk investigation with the public? That is such odd behavior
@Msl0511@imelizabethlane Its funny you mentioned Ian because he was the one who passed Nate in Candaces direction!! Then the Mitch Snow thing happen and I was like ooooo nooo!! Nah man this guy is a fed, but like you said an op that could help out in a really big way
@Msl0511@imelizabethlane Bro, those couple podcasts Nate did about Mitch in the beginning were SO WILD to me and unexpected. I literally had to unfollow him because it felt wrong. Then again right now Nate is doing pretty good work and is back on track. He's a green beret so he definitely is an asset
@Msl0511@imelizabethlane Nah man, she's on the right side of the Charlie Kirk reporting. Mitch has issue because he doesn't trust Nate which is valid do to what Nate and Gary did to Mitch in the beginning. Nate seemed to course correct a while back which is good because he has good knowledge.
@realhonestash I remember watching Nate say all this stuff, I literally had to unfollow him but after a month or two something changed and I felt like he realized he had made a huge mistake and course corrected. I do follow him now but I'll never forget those couple podcasts, it was weirdddd
@WhiteHouse Tax cuts for who?!?! Not for the regular American, when you decide to send out checks to every American instead of sending billions to isreal let the people know, we won't hold our breath
@LauraLoomer@cenkuygur@hasanthehun If you EVER become DHS Secretary the country is OVERRRRR. Done, cooked, finished. I wouldnt put you in charge of making toast! You'd burn it!!