This wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that Trump is an investor in Axon, and that the company is linked to an Israeli police tech firm founded by Jeffrey Epstein and former Israel PM Ehud Barak, with BlackRock as its largest shareholder now…
Would it?! 🤨
[RG911Team] Powerful people in government don’t want this event to happen.
You’ll understand why in the first 20 seconds.
The largest gathering of whistleblowers, public figures and researchers in history will expose the 9/11 deception - and we won’t let the deep state stop us.
Join us in NYC from Sept 10-13 with 9/11 first responders, 9/11 family members, and other brave voices who refuse to be silenced.
Because as the world sits on the brink of all-out war, speaking truth to power has never been more critical.
Learn more about Turning the Tide 2026 and get your ticket in the comment below ⬇️
This is one of the most sloppy frame jobs in history. People who can’t see through this should be studied by scientists.
I get it that Zionists support the obvious bull shit narrative, are there any people who support the government narrative that aren’t Zionists?
BREAKING: The three major U.S. broadcast networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC, have yet to report on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic.
'F*CKING NAZI F*CK!'
Israeli settler TRIES TO BREAK into PALESTINIAN HOME in West Bank
Throws ROCKS through windows, SPITS at OWNER, threatens to 'F*CK UP YOU & YOUR EUROPEAN WH*RE' while an IDF soldier WATCHES
Theo Von unloaded on America’s relationship with Israel, no script, no filter.
“I do have a lot of uncomfort about America’s relationship with Israel… It just feels like a satanic regime at this point.”
Then he went deeper:
“It feels like he’s just been compromised by Israel, by this dark government over there… It’s f*cking baffling. And it’s sick.”
Theo continued: “I don't believe the Israeli leaders have any intention to stop that or they have any care for the American people.”
“If we don't speak up now our children won't have the chance to speak up…either by law or worse.”
One under-discussed possibility regarding Thiel's apparent move to Argentina is that Argentina has - for many years - allowed certain wealthy, foreign billionaires to establish de facto parallel states in the country, where the federal government declines to intervene, even to protect its own citizens and laws.
Roughly seven years ago, I traveled to Argentina and wrote about how UK billionaire Joe Lewis (who Trump recently pardoned after he was found guilty of insider trading) had established one such "parallel state" in Argentine Patagonia, and even controls a private airport that the Argentine state doesn't even pretend to monitor. (Article link is below)
Did Milei allow Thiel the opportunity to experiment with one such "parallel state"? Given how Thiel and his associates are eager to create "network states" along similar lines, and Milei's own ideological leanings and personal ties to that crowd, it is an angle worth considering.
My 2019 article on Joe Lewis in Argentina for MintPress: https://t.co/RsFvYxfOiI
Last night between midnight and 2am, they tried to pass two bad versions of FISA…
Both would have allowed Feds to unconstitutionally spy on Americans.
We stopped both versions, but the fight isn’t over. Eventually, it was decided to give them two more weeks to fix FISA.
BREAKING:
Israel is carpet bombing Qana in South Lebanon in the middle of the night, targeting civilian homes while families are asleep inside.
Entire households are being wiped out.
There are reports of many innocents killed.
This is a massacre.
MASSIVE BOMBSHELL! Prominent journalist Max Blumenthal reveals Lara Trump and Don Jr. own a 30 percent stake in Salem Media, a registered Israeli foreign agent! The Trump family is literally taking millions from the Israeli government to propagandize the American public.
Remember when people said Trump would end censorship and protect free speech but somehow forgot that during his first term, his administration literally made a plan to murder Julian Assange for publishing and further criminalized national security whistleblowing in other ways.
I wonder what those people have to say about this. I can guess.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) says no one is talking about the most important part of the Epstein story.
Here's what everyone is somehow missing in the Epstein files:
#Iran War Update No. 31 (focus on Iranian strategic narrative):
🔹A missile strike on Israel’s Bazan refinery complex in Haifa marked a continuation of Iran’s retaliatory strikes targeting Israeli energy infrastructure in response to Israeli attacks on similar facilities in Iran. However, the impact of such strikes on infrastructure in Israel still appears limited compared to similar cases in the Gulf. This may partly reflect constraints on available information regarding attacks in Israel, but it is also likely tied to differences in Iran’s operational capabilities at short range (the Persian Gulf) versus long range.
🔹In any case, Iranian narratives framed the strike not as incidental damage but as part of a deliberate campaign against Israel’s industrial backbone, signaling a shift toward sustained infrastructure warfare as a core pillar of strategy. The prevailing assessment is that, as the conflict enters a more attritional phase and Israel’s missile interception capacity becomes strained, Iran’s ability to inflict more serious damage in the coming days will increase.
🔹Across both state and semi-state spheres, March 30 was presented as a landmark (one month of resistance) and as evidence that the initial U.S.-Israeli objective of rapid strategic collapse had failed. In this sense, there is growing discussion of a transition toward a war of endurance.
🔹This narrative aligns with the growing confidence among Iranian strategists noted earlier. In other words, Iranian discourse is no longer centered on merely withstanding pressure, but on demonstrating that time and economic disruption are increasingly working in Iran’s favor.
🔹The Strait of Hormuz continues to feature as a structural lever to be sustained over the long term. Iranian state propaganda emphasizes near-total disruption of shipping flows to underscore global economic dependence on Iranian decisions. However, beyond propaganda, political actions and legal justifications point to a serious Iranian intent to maintain control over the strait.
🔹In this vein, Iran’s parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Commission has prepared a draft law for the “management of the Strait of Hormuz,” which is expected to be reviewed soon. The draft includes measures such as imposing transit fees on passing vessels. At the same time, Iran’s Foreign Ministry considers the current situation in the Strait of Hormuz to be legally justifiable, arguing that under wartime conditions, the principle of safe passage does not apply to belligerent parties.
🔹At the same time, the broader debate over the strait reflects an evolution in Iranian thinking, where escalation dominance is increasingly defined in economic terms rather than purely military metrics.
🔹In another related development, satellite imagery showed fires at two pumping stations along the Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, which transports oil from Abu Dhabi to the port of Fujairah, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. Although Iran has not officially claimed responsibility, the prevailing view among commentators is that this was intended to hinder the development of alternatives to the strait and preserve Iran’s leverage.
🔹Trump’s renewed threats to strike Iranian oil infrastructure and force the Strait of Hormuz open were interpreted in Tehran as evidence of strategic frustration rather than strength, reinforcing the narrative that Washington lacks viable off-ramps. Among analysts, there is broad consensus that Tehran is unlikely to take Trump’s threats seriously.
🔹At the same time, Iranian officials continue to publicly reject the existence of meaningful negotiations, framing U.S. diplomatic signaling as, at best, an attempt to calm U.S. and global markets and, at worst, a deceptive cover for continued escalation.
🔹Meanwhile, Lebanon has seen a notable widening of the battlespace, with Israeli evacuation warnings extending into the western Bekaa, suggesting a shift toward broader targeting patterns deeper inside Lebanese territory rather than localized border engagements.
🔹This has been interpreted as Israel moving toward a strategy of fragmenting Hezbollah’s operational space. While Iran benefits from tying down Israeli resources on a secondary front, there are growing concerns about developments on the ground in Lebanon. This helps explain Iran’s insistence that any plan to end the war should encompass “all fronts,” not just Iran.
🔹Simultaneously, political tensions in Beirut have intensified as Iran refuses to withdraw its ambassador despite pressure from the Lebanese government, highlighting Tehran’s unwillingness to concede influence even under military pressure. At the same time, there are concerns in Tehran that this could provide Israel with a pretext to carry out a direct or indirect attack against the Iranian embassy in Beirut.
🔹Yemen’s role has remained limited in immediate impact but has grown in strategic relevance, with drone launches toward Eilat reinforcing the emergence of a southern pressure front.
🔹The significance lies in force dispersion. Even low-intensity Houthi activity compels Israel to divert air defense and surveillance assets away from Iran and Lebanon. This is an advantage for Iran in a war of attrition.
🔹Iraq has remained comparatively quiet kinetically, but tensions have risen as Kuwait formally protested militia activity originating from Iraqi territory. This may signal growing Gulf frustration with Baghdad’s inability to contain armed groups, whose activities could expand into other Gulf theaters if escalation leads them to more directly join the war on Iran’s side.
🔹This may also point to a shift in the role of Iraqi armed groups from a purely anti-U.S. pressure tool to a source of intra-regional friction, thereby increasing the political cost of their operations for the Iraqi government.
🔹Internally, Iran has intensified its domestic security posture, with expanded arrests and counterintelligence activity reflecting concerns over information leakage and wartime dissent.
🔹This reflects a dual-track approach in which external messaging projects resilience and control, while internal measures indicate awareness of vulnerabilities associated with a prolonged conflict.
🔹Across all fronts, a clearer division of labor is emerging: Lebanon as the primary attritional theater, Yemen as a latent maritime pressure zone, and Iraq as a more flexible arena with the potential to engage both the United States and the Gulf states.
🔹Overall, Day 31 reflects consolidation rather than escalation, with Iran refining a theory of victory centered on endurance, distributed pressure, and the progressive externalization of the costs of war.
I got a lot of shit for saying why I don't trust the Joe Kent trajectory and, why I was obviously put on the spot about it and could have been more articulate, I think the points I brought up are very reasonable.
If the top counter-terror spook resigns to amplify rhetoric (even if it's mostly accurate) that the current administration defines as indicative of "domestic terrorism" AND that spook was previously also funded by Peter Thiel, the co-founder and chairman of the intelligence contractor working to establish domestic terror pre-crime in the US, I think it's fair to be skeptical of him.
Trump previously considered making a pre-crime program using AI to flag the social media accounts of Americans who displayed "warning signs" of violence or "mental illness". It's main advocate was Jared Kushner. There have been many recent media efforts to equate criticism of Israel to "anti-semitism" and "anti-semitism" to mental illness. Most social media giants are owned or funded by people who lied about their ties to Epstein and also contract for (or are otherwise linked to) the US national security apparatus.
That same apparatus has expanded infrastructure for the supposed "War on Domestic Terror" with the blessing of every administration since George W. Bush, it is bipartisan, and they didn't just build it for no reason - they intend to use it at some point.
Also, the idea that there is a "civil war" in the White House, as proposed by people like Nick Fuentes, over the Iran War only helps JD Vance, who is also tied at the hip to Palantir's Peter Thiel.
I took a lot of shit in the past for my stances on Covid, on Trump being a neocon, and on Epstein's intel ties, etc. etc. way before it was "popular" to do so but which turned out to be correct. I am not here to be popular or to tell you what you want to hear. I have been early on a lot of stories that other people now take credit for after the fact.
I don't care if you like me and I don't care about getting credit, I care that some of you wake the fuck up and stop swallowing every single psyop they throw at you without thinking twice about it.
Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm.
Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer.
Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate.
“This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.”
“This is to grant the corporations immunity.”
“If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.”
This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement.
But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it.
There is still time to fight back.
We need all hands on deck to stop this.
Here’s how you can take action:
Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵
@RepThomasMassie