Joe Sneed

Follower of Jesus Christ as He has revelaed Himself in the 66 books of the Bible.

[Joe Sneed @SlayingGiants7]

Ah, memories.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Tim Walz is supporting these transgender dolls with removable genitalia being given to KIDS as YOUNG AS 4 YEARS OLD starting this fall

Minnesota is now putting the dolls in school. The genitalia can be swapped between dolls

"They will debut this fall in Minnesota classrooms to kids as young as 4...My Gender Dolls was launched by two professors."

Leftists in higher education are mentally ill, and Tim Walz should resign.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

If Elon owned Twitter in 2020 they wouldn’t have been able to pull off COVID.

Mass censorship was the key to everything.

Facts.

[Homeland Security @DHSgov]

🚨75,000 NONCITIZENS are called for jury duty in New Jersey EVERY YEAR.

It’s clear New Jersey’s government databases are unreliable in ensuring only Americans are voting in AMERICAN elections and serving in jury pools.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

Fauci's diary, March 15, 2020: I convinced NYC Mayor & Cali Governor to close schools, bars, and restaurants.

Fauci, July 26, 2022: "First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down."

[John LeFevre @JohnLeFevre]

I sat on the syndicate desk of a global investment bank from the dot-com crash through the global financial crisis.

We had to do a lot of media work to promote deals. One day I asked our Global Head of Communications why the media was so gentle with us.

He laughed:
“Because we’re one of their biggest advertisers.”

That explains a lot of the media’s treatment of Elon.

Tesla is so successful, its ad spend is effectively zero, or ~0.01% of the $40 billion global auto advertising market.

No ad dollars = no protection.

No one knows this better than Big Pharma.

They don't make confusing and enigmatic ads to sell you product; they make the ads to control the media.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

2/9 Jan. 26, 2020. Fauci writes in his diary: "Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier."

That is January of 2020. The wet market was already off the table in his own private notes.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Shocking data reveals: 96% of ALL terrorism and security threat investigations in Germany in 2025 were linked to Islamic extremism.

[Megan Basham @megbasham]

This is the way.

[Wes Huff @WesleyLHuff]

One thing must be emphatically stated. The New Testament books did not become authoritative for the Church because they were formally included in a canonical list; on the contrary, the Church included them because she already regarded them as divinely inspired, recognized their innate worth and generally apostolic authority, direct or indirect.
 - F.F Bruce

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

The term "Palestine" until the 20th century referred to an administrative region without fixed or clear borders and with no national identity. The people who lived there before then were either regarded as Ottomans or as part of the Syrian region.

The term came from the final humiliation of the Jews by the Romans in AD 135, following the Bar Kokhba Revolt. The Romans put down the revolt and humiliated the Jews by renaming Judea, etc., "Syria Palaestina," which means "philistine Syria." Arabs and other Arabic speakers record this by naming the land of "Filastin" (ard Filastin) in their fatwas and some other writing.

While some Muslims used the term that we'd render as Palestine, and many Europeans did as a hangover from the Latin name for the region, especially given the general vacancy and irrelevance of the region to most world affairs, it was never anything more than a vague regional designation. There was no state, no province, no administrative district, even, referred to by any name that would render to "Palestine" today. There was, as noted, certainly no national or even sub-national identity, and any attempt to do so would have been shut down by seeing them as incorporated within the broader Syrian identity. The name carried roughly the same kind of specific significance as a term like the "Near East" would today.

Identifying people as "Palestinians" didn't really begin until the very end of the 19th century, and even then it was a reaction to Zionism and Jews starting to move into the region. The term was sort of mainstreamed as a political reality after the Ottoman Empire was broken up in defeat after World War I, and the region came under British control using the old Latin terminology as "British Mandate Palestine," meaning "the part of the Palestinian region under British control." That was roughly thirty years before Israel would declare independence as the sovereign nation-state of Israel as we know it today. At no point in this story is there a sovereign nation-state called Palestine or anything resembling it.

That said, the beginnings of an Arab "Palestinian" identity as oppositional to Zionism and British Mandatory control, developed from their previous 1890s beginnings to something more like a dedicated resistance identity when the Brits took over. Arabs didn't believe in British sovereignty or control over what they deemed Islamic land, either, and they were adamantly opposed to the Mandate's explicit Zionism, which was being acted upon to bring Jews into the region (even though the British were wishy-washy on this and then betrayed it during WWII, when it was arguably needed most).

The "Palestinian" identity at the time wasn't exactly national but quasi-national and born (and borne) only in resistance. It gained some crystallization as such in the mid and late 1930s after the failed Arab Revolt, significantly as a response (back-up plan) to the failure of Greater Syria to defend "Arab" interests in the region against British (and Jewish Zionist) control.

Still, it didn't acquire something approaching the identity status people might recognize today for about another decade. That had to wait until after the "Nakba" in 1948-49. This contested event occurred when five of the surrounding actual Arabian nations declared and LOST a war on the newly declared Israel. These were Egypt, Syria, (Trans)jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon.

Now, this war was the continuation of the same war being fought in the region before Israel's declaration of independence (May 15, 1948) following the late 1947 UN Partition of the region, which the proto-Israelis accepted and all the Arabs rejected. The Arabs started that war, too. Notice no state of Palestine was involved because there was no state of Palestine to be involved. Something like a "Palestinian identity" as a refusal of these developments took significant shape at the time, though.

The Arabs refer to this humiliating loss as a "catastrophe," THE catastrophe (Nakba), and rewrote history to create a "Palestinian" people who were displaced, harmed, and killed by the (defensive) military actions of the Israelis, which they see as an act of colonial aggression because they cannot admit or accept that they lost the wars, including WWI, which removed the land from Muslim control (which they believe is permanent). The "Palestinian people," whom none of these Arab states would absorb because they were more useful as a military-political weapon against Israel, came into existence as a tool to further their Islamic designs.

By the way, the UN Partition in 1947 (General Assembly Resolution 181) does not name the two states it partitioned "Israel" and "Palestine." It called them the "Jewish State" and the "Arab State." The Jews took for themselves the name "Israel" for that land, as they would. As for the "Arab State," it is not actually clear what would have been its fate. Jordan (Transjordan) viewed the Arab land by the Jordan River to naturally be part of its territory, not an independent state called "Palestine." The Syrians opposed this not particularly because they wanted the land but because they didn't want Jordanian expansion. As for Gaza, Egypt wanted administrative control but not to annex it. It is not clear what it's fate as "Arab State" would have been.

In all, in 1948-49, and following the "Nakba," these behaviors and conflicts reflected the broader pattern of inter-Arab rivalry more than anything else. The neighboring states were more focused on preventing a Jewish state and on blocking one another’s gains than on creating a viable independent Palestinian Arab state under the UN plan. The very idea of "Palestine" with a unique national identity and (fabricated) national history would have to wait.

Identity during this period (1949-1967) was still largely either "Arab" or as part of one of the Arab states, like Syrian, Jordan, or Egyptian, specifically, or just "Islamic." Movements like pan-Arabism and even pan-Syrianism were more relevant to the identity of the people today treated as "Palestinians" than was anything to do with Palestine, although the word was used. The biggest change in this period from the one before is that before this, the term "Palestinian" referred also to Jews in the region (under the Mandate), which more or less ended. Arab states also kicked out all the Jews (850,000 of them) during this time, and most of them were absorbed by Israel.

Even still, the idea of a "Palestinian nation," wasn't really invented in 1948. It didn't really gain solid identity in the global imagination as such until after the Six-Day War in 1967, which the Arabs (especially Egypt) lost badly to Israel. This second humiliation, referred to as the Naksa ("setback" or "relapse" or "defeat"), which displaced some 400,000 people* as Israel pushed threats out of its immediate vicinity by taking the lands from which they operated, changed the strategic needs of the resistance movement and fabricated a Palestinian national identity with a bogus history more or less out of thin air. That's the one defended to this day.

*These people were in large part there as a stand of active resistance against the existence of Israel as part of the aforementioned strategic refusal of any Arab states to absorb them, etc., so focusing on their displacement alone is complicated, to say the least.

The thing is, the idea to do this Palestinian national identity thing was largely due to Yasser Arafat, who was working with and getting aid and assistance from the Soviets (and arguably strategic advice in this regard, as the "Palestinian cause" strongly resembles elements of Soviet korenizatsiya programming, which has proved a useful wedge device all over the world). Moscow got involved after 1967 largely because it was only after the Six-Day War that Israel allied formally with the United States (and Western Alliance), which was the ultimate enemy of the Soviets.

Palestinian "national" identity has always therefore been a political contrivance designed to be used as a wedge and weapon against any sovereign control, especially by Jews, of any land in the broad region the Romans once declared "Syria Palaestina." A nontrivial part of this curious effort was an allied Soviet-Arab program to damage Israel and weaken American and Western interests in the Middle East (another regional designation term that isn't a nation, by the way).

That is, it's NOT REAL. It's a political contrivance meant to destabilize the region, kill and displace Jews, and fight Western interests. That's why it exists.

Since it's not real in the sense of being a genuine national identity stretching back into history in any regard, the culture that is assigned to it is also a fabrication. It is a blend of various Islamic and Arab cultural points with outright jihadist and Soviet-Communist radicalism and terrorism treated as though it's a culture. It's a culture of "resistance" and "liberation" in precisely the Communist uses of the terms. It's a "culture" in the same way "Woke" is a culture. In fact, it's basically the same thing, just Islamic and Third-Worldist Arab flavored instead of Western identity politics.

[The New York Times @nytimes]

Breaking News: A car plowed through a park during Berlin’s biggest LGBTQ Pride event, killing at least one person and injuring more than a dozen others, city police officials said on Saturday. https://t.co/NlqLMjtJB1

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Trump was so far ahead in the 2020 Election, that Democrats had to literally shut down the count, some even stopped in the middle of the day for no reason at all, and they had to cheat on top of already cheating in order for Biden to clear the margin of victory.

Every vote that came in when counting resumed was for Biden, which is statistically impossible. The 2020 election was stolen, and everybody knows it.

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Everybody needs to read this.

People keep throwing around the word communism without actually explaining in graphic detail what life in a communist regime entails or how all of these communist regimes started out as moderates.

Every single one.

[Steve Deace @SteveDeaceShow]

More quantification why white evangelicals are the most targeted voting group for decades now. We are literally all that stands between the Spirit of the Age that destroyed Old Christendom in Europe and America.

[Archaeo - Histories @archeohistories]

"Saqaliba", white European slaves were mostly of Slavic origin and considered luxury imports....

Slavery is a word well understood, but in the minds of most people, it is associated with the black slave trade from Africa to America across the Atlantic. Many people are not aware that a parallel form of slavery existed in the kidnapping of white men and women by North Africans and Arabs. The purpose of these captures was slavery. Another aspect of this slavery was white women (preferably virgins) to populate the harems of the Arab Sheikhs and Beys. The Arabs and the Moors were the foremost exponents of this trade as they had a penchant for fair and golden-haired white girls. This trade lasted much longer than the black slave trade and overshot it by hundreds of years.

The black trade was stopped by an act of legislation. This did not happen in the case of the white slave trade which ended only after the Arabs and Moors were militarily crushed by the European powers.

The onset of white slave trade began when the Muslim arms conquered almost the entire North Africa and Spain. It was at its zenith when the Mediterranean Sea almost became a Muslim controlled lake with the Ottoman Empire at its zenith. Even after the defeat of the Muslims, the slave trade was taken over by Muslim pirates called the Corsairs.

The Corsairs were a daredevil lot and scoured the entire Mediterranean Sea. They also raided the coastal villages of Europe and kidnapped white girls. These girls have spirited away to the harems of the Arabs and sold at auctions where they earned a high price for the kidnapper.

White men were also kidnapped for ransom and to work as slaves. There are reports that King Richard the lion heart was also kidnapped and released when a large ransom was paid for him. As far as the kidnapping of girls from the European coastal villages is concerned, the effect was one of fear and many villages shifted deeper away from the coast, to escape from the marauding Muslim pirates.

Later the Muslim pirates started a preference for Slav girls who were fair and had golden hair. Raiding parties roamed the Baltic and the Aegean Sea for these girls.

The magnitude of the slavery can only be estimated as no exact figures are available. Generally, it is estimated that the figure would be over a million. The Corsairs were the main exponents of this white slave trade and they also extracted a levy from the ships that sailed the Mediterranean Sea. In the period after 1609 in a span of a decade, almost 400 British ships were captured and the men made slaves and released only after a ransom was paid. Other who could not pay languished in Arab farms as workers and slaves till death.

Later Britain paid a tribute and their ships were spared. But nations and settlements close to the sea in SE Europe and the Slav areas bore the brunt of this slavery.

A fact that has now emerged is the massive kidnapping and abduction of white girls as slaves for the harems of the Arabs. This menace lasted for hundreds of years and it continued until the 19th century. In 1814 the European powers signed a convention to outlaw the attacks of the Berbers and the Ottoman Turks.

The Christian nations now asserted and the rising White power inflicted heavy defeats on the Corsairs and the Turks. This rising European power led to the demise of the white slave trade. A point worth noting is that the slave trade in white women only stopped after the defeat of the Turks and Muslims and not by any act or edict.

#archaeohistories

[Josh Howerton @howertonjosh]

2 Kings 25:9 says Nebuchadnezzar *BURNED* the first temple

2,600 years later archaeologists discover *BURNED* wooden beams exactly where that temple stood and exactly from that era.

The Bible REALLY happened, y’all.

The real Jesus died on a real cross for the real you, and if you give Hin your life He can REALLY change it forever.

[Ambassador Mike Huckabee @GovMikeHuckabee]

Every American should heed the lessons of Lebanon as articulated by the incredible @ACTBrigitte Bridgett Gabriel.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

They are invading just as surely as a conventional army would, but slow enough to avoid triggering an armed defense by Britain

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Hillary Clinton being a “far-right” extremist: We should not give taxpayer funded healthcare benefits to illegal aliens or encourage illegal immigration

[Shahriq Khan @RealShahriqKhan]

You know what Muslims, Mormons, and Jews say to me constantly?

“You don't follow Jesus. You follow Paul.”
Bro... you don't understand how Christianity works.

You do NOT need Paul to believe Jesus is the Messiah.

If Paul disappeared tomorrow, Christianity would still stand.
Why?

Because the Torah and the prophets already did the heavy lifting.

Genesis: sin enters the world.
Exodus and Leviticus: blood, atonement, and substitution.

Passover: the spotless lamb.
Isaiah: the suffering servant.
Daniel: the Messiah.

That's not Paul.

That's Moses, David, Isaiah, Daniel, and the entire prophetic story.
Paul didn't invent Jesus.
Paul looked at the Scriptures and realized:

This was ALWAYS about Him.
And Paul wasn't some random guy making up theology.
He was a Pharisee trained in the law.
So when he preached, what did he quote?

The Old Testament.
Over.
And over.
And over.

His argument was simple:
If the Scriptures are true, Jesus Christ is unavoidable.

So saying Christians follow Paul instead of Jesus is like saying you follow the referee instead of the rulebook.

Paul isn't the point.
He's pointing you to the point.

Don't like Paul?
Fine.

Read Isaiah 53 without him.
Read Psalm 22 without him.
Read Daniel 9 without him.

You'll still end up staring directly at Jesus.
Christianity isn't built on Paul.

It's built on the Messiah the Scriptures were already pointing to.

And once I finally read Paul charitably...
Bro.

The man was an absolute SAVAGE for the faith.

Follow this account for more Christian apologetics, Muslim evangelism, and the biblical truth that led me from Islam to Jesus.