@welshphoton@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine Collecting methadone from a pharmacy isn't working in medicine. There isn't new evidence. The CCRC are going to reject an appeal. They do not agree with expert shopping. Maybe brush up on some legal basics when you are not busy with medicine....
@welshphoton@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine Because they were born premature, it does not mean they were at deaths door. Most just needed some assistance with feeding and breathing for a short time. Room 1, is high dependency. Rooms 2,3,4 were low dependency. Multiple babies were being prepared to go home.
@welshphoton@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine Air embolism was not diagnosed solely by skin discolouration. The actual research into this in neonates is also limited for ethical reasons And Shoo Lee's paper stated that the amount of cases in the paper was so small that conclusions should not be drawn from it
@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine Some of the babies didn't have anything wrong with them, they were being prepared to go home. The pattern is always the same. Letby appears and is alone with the baby immediately before a sudden unexpected collapse. Repeat this scenario 30x
@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine Much of what they said has actually already been rebuffed at trial. Its almost like they aren't familiar with the details of that. Its misinformation. Probably why they are not even referring to the babies as A-Q. More confusion. Also not mentioning certain babies at all.
@Cath0378@JeremyVineOn5@thecarolemalone@ayeshahazarika@theJeremyVine The panel of experts "hand picked" by the defence and Dr Lee.
You do realise that they will not possibly have started from a neutral viewpoint. Some of the explanations for the deaths are almost comical. they would be laughed out of court in all honesty.
@littlegurrier@sarahknapton I'lle take the word of the people that saw this happen first hand, such as the mother of baby E, over some random dickhead on the internet. You should familiarise with their statements made at thirlwall.
@littlegurrier@sarahknapton "only a matter of time"
"Miscarriage of justice"
Letby will never be getting out.
Enjoy your little hobby though, you deluded freak.
@JohnAspinall4@guyrowlanduk Whats that got to do with physic parents that don't need to be psychic to know when someone is telling bare faced lies about their interactions and discussions. The parents aren't liars or incorrect. Its amazing how random arseholes on twitter think they know better...
@littlegurrier@sarahknapton You keep telling yourself that. Back on planet Earth, the wheels of justice turn as normal. This is why courts are courts of law and not courts of public opinion. Public opinion might be loud and persistent but plays no part in a court’s decision.
@Positively4thS@MySweetLandlord@PJackso09105554 Being stretched has nothing to do with it. If there is evidence to suggest Letby has harmed further children and the threshold for the CPS is reached, there will be new charges. The parents deserve answers.