Stranded on the Right after Center moved too far Left. BA (History), Masters (Public Administration), MBA (International Business). Non PC, evil landlord!
In past so many organisations came and gone but we will make sure GJP (General Janta party) will be last organisation, after this no new organisation need to come as we will work hard to remove reservation.
Together we raised, divided we fall
Let's make this bigger, and remove Reservation.
Join GJP
https://t.co/BTvfVubJ3v
CC: @GJP_YouthWing@GJPSpokesperson
रेलवे ALP रिजल्ट 🔥🔥
मुकेश मीणा(ST)- 29 पास
मुकेश जाटव(SC)- 37 पास
मुकेश यादव (ओबीसी)- 30 पास
मुकेश तिवारी(जनरल) - 69 फैल
क्या यही है सामाजिक न्याय क्या इस तरह बनेगा हमारा देश विश्वगुरु?
Dear So called CJP supporters, if you are the true sons of your mothers,
Time for Punjab, Kerala, Jharkhand and Karnataka education minister to resign too
Demand resignation of
-Education minister of kerela
-Education minister of Punjab
-Education minister of karnataka
-Education minister of Jharkhand
महाराष्ट्र में एक हिंदू लड़के ने अपना status रखा-
"जाति आधारित आरक्षण बंद करो"
फिर उसको भीम सैनिकों ने खूब मारा और अम्बेडकर की फ़ोटो के सामने माफी मंगवाई!
अब कोई बताए-
ये लोग शोषित हैं?
आरक्षण के खिलाफ लिखने पर ये अब लोगों को पीटेंगे?
इनमें और STSJ वालों में क्या फर्क है?
पहले से छांट रखी थीं हिन्दुओं की दुकानें,
आगे किये गए थे कंधों पर भगवा रंग के गमछे,
NEET के नाम पर सनातनी कारोबारी बनाए गए निशाना,
छात्र हित के नाम पर विपक्ष समर्थित उन्मादियों ने फिर से किया धर्मद्रोह,
बिहार का ये वायरल वीडियो स्वयं में है बहुत बड़ी गवाही एक बड़े सच की..
#Bihar #Protest @bihar_police
Dear Hindus, I'm planning a protest at Jantar Mantar to make our India a Hindu Rashtra
Pls tell if you are with me. Hindu Rashtra is our right and we will take it at any cost 🚩
ये वीडियो 18 जुलाई का है जब पुलिस सोनम वांगचुक को उठाकर अस्पताल ले गई थी
जिस व्यक्ति को जंतर मंतर पर टॉयलेट जाने के लिए चार लोगों के सहारे की ज़रूरत पड़ती थी, वो अस्पताल पहुंचते ही राहुल गांधी के अंदाज़ में एक हाथ जेल में डाल कर पुलिस से लड़ने लगा
मैं पहले दिन से कह रहा हूँ कि सोनम का असली अनशन तो अस्पताल पहुँच कर शुरू हुआ जहाँ तीन दिन भी वो भूख बर्दाश्त नहीं कर पाए और धर्मेंद्र प्रधान का नाम लेना ही छोड़ दिया
अकेले में सोनम का पुलिस से बोलने का तरीक़ा देखिये और पब्लिसिटी वीडियो में इनकी बनावटी विनम्रता से तुलना कीजिए
भारतीय राजनीति के मंच पर दूसरे केजरीवाल का पर्दापण हो चुका है, ये चिंता की बात है
India was the cradle of civilisation. Not one of several.
Several people have replied to my recent essay by saying there is no single cradle of civilisation. Civilisation developed independently in Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China and South America. Why make it a competition?
This sounds like humility, but it is the same evasive move that propped up the Aryan invasion theory for a century: when the evidence becomes inconvenient, redraw the question so no evidence can ever settle it.
Consider what would have to be true for independent emergence to hold. Indus-Sarasvati merchant seals would not appear across Sumerian cities. An Akkadian cylinder seal would not name its owner as an interpreter of the Meluhhan language. Bead necklaces manufactured at Lothal would not turn up in Queen Puabi's tomb at Ur around 2450 BC. Pre-dynastic Egyptian graves at Nakada would not contain mud brick-lined pits in Sumerian and Indus-Sarasvati style, alongside cylinder seals and lapis lazuli from the northernmost Indus-Sarasvati settlement. The Sumerian scribes would not record ships arriving from Meluhha carrying timber, copper, carnelian and cotton.
All of those things happened, and they are in the archaeological record. They have been for decades.
The "independent emergence" position has a convenient feature. No evidence can ever dislodge it. Merchant seals from one civilisation found inside another become "evidence of trade, not dependency." Identical brick ratios become "convergent development." A professional interpreter role for a foreign language becomes "contact, but not influence." At every point the conclusion is decided in advance, and the evidence is arranged around it.
Others have argued that even if the civilisations were connected, Mesopotamia was still earlier. Earliest attested writing. Earliest cities. Earliest legal codes. The crucial word is "attested," which means found and recorded by archaeologists. Mesopotamia was excavated intensively from the 1840s. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. The site at Bhirrana, dated to 7570-6200 BC, with planned streets, drainage, standardised weights and bronze metallurgy millennia before it appears elsewhere, was identified only recently. Mehrgarh, around 7000 BC, supported 20,000 people growing wheat, barley and cotton, and trading lapis lazuli and copper beads. "Earliest attested" tells you where archaeologists chose to dig, but it does not tell you what existed first.
So at what point does evidence of connection actually count? When one civilisation's merchants are living in another's cities, boring beads with their own technology and maintaining a permanent enclave at Lagash? When the Sumerian texts record ships from Meluhha bringing wealth but never once mention Sumerian ships sailing east? When Indus-Sarasvati seals are found throughout Mesopotamia but no Mesopotamian seal has ever been found in Indus-Sarasvati lands?
And that is before the underwater evidence from the Gulf of Cambay and the Tamil coast, where sonar readings suggest ports thousands of years older than anything in Mesopotamia. If those dates hold, the question of independent emergence becomes redundant.
Treating every civilisation as equally primary, whichever direction the evidence actually points, is a kind of participation trophy for entire fields of study, not open-mindedness.
Independent emergence is where one lands once you’ve already decided not to look at what moved between the geographical boxes, or in which direction. It kept the Aryan invasion theory standing for a hundred years, and it's propping up the same evasion today.
LEGAL NOTICE / CEASE AND DESIST DEMAND
To,
MR. KUNAL KAMRA
Stand-Up Comedian & Public Figure
C/o Management / Talent Agency
Pearl Entertainment / Black Hat Talent Solutions
Head Office: 401, 4th Floor, Sanghvi Heights,
S. M. Road, Wadala (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400037
Email Address: [email protected]
SUBJECT: LEGAL NOTICE FOR DELIBERATE AND MALICIOUS OUTRAGING OF RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS, INTENTIONAL INSULT TO PROVOKE BREACH OF PEACE, AND PUBLIC MISCHIEF UNDER SECTIONS 196, 299, 352, AND 353 OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA (BNS), 2023 READ WITH THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND THE IT (INTERMEDIARY GUIDELINES) RULES, 2021.
Mr. Kamra ,
1.THAT you, the Noticee, are a public figure, stand-up performer, and social media influencer exercising significant reach across various digital media platforms including YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram.
1.1 THAT recently, a video recording of your live performance/address was widely broadcast, published, and circulated across social media platforms (specifically available at URL:https://t.co/QnY2nOZNW9) , archived with digital hash records as per Section 63 of Bharatiya SakshyaAdhiniyam, 2023), wherein you made the following verbatim public statement:
"ये जो सरकार है, ये जो कर रही है, ये बहुत सालों से कर रही है औरहमने देखा है कि ये लोग बस सीता के पति का नाम ले-ले के नीता केपति का काम कर रहे हैं..."
1.2 THAT in the aforesaid public statement, you have knowingly, deliberately, and maliciously drawn an irreverent, derogatory, and satirical comparison involving the highly revered Hindu deity Lord Ram (derogatorily styled as "सीता केपति") to subserve cheap political satire and commercial gains.
2.Your deliberate act of degrading and trivializing the sacred identity of Lord Ram for theatrical entertainment constitutes a premeditated and malicious attempt to insult the religious beliefs of millions of Hindu devotees, fulfilling the essential ingredients of Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2.1 By weaponizing religious revered figures in a public forum to incite political cynicism and public outrage, your actions tend to generate ill-will, enmity, and disharmony among different sections of society, directly violating Section 196 of BNS, 2023.
2.2Your public utterances constitute intentional insult with full knowledge that such provocative statements are inherently calculated to disturb public tranquility, induce public mischief, and provoke a breach of peace.
2.3 The electronic transmission, uploading, and monetization of the impugned clip across open digital networks violates Rule 3(1)(b) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which strictly prohibits hosting content that is objectionable, blasphemous, or offensive to religious sensibilities.
3.THAT your unauthorized, malafide, and irreverent conduct has caused severe emotional trauma, mental agony, and deep personal distress to public , whose religious convictions have been deeply hurt by your calculated attempt to lower the sanctity of divine figures in the public domain.
4. In light of the statutory violations detailed above, you are hereby called upon to strictly comply with the following requisites within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the receipt of this Legal Notice:
4.1 Issue a written, unconditional public apology across all your official social media channels (YouTube, X, Instagram) acknowledging the irreverent reference and expressing regret for outraging Hindu religious sentiments.
4.2 Cease and desist from further circulating or broadcasting the impugned clip, and immediately remove/delete the subject video from all digital channels and media hosting platforms under your control.
4.3 Provide a formal written undertaking assuring that you will refrain from making similar disparaging, irreverent, or derogatory references to religious deities in any future public performances or digital broadcasts.