Posting chart analysis from snappchart daily
Drop a comment if you want your chart to be analysed. Each follower get one.
You can also continue to get analysis at https://t.co/kCa8pMytFc
genuine question: how do you personally tell overhead supply (dilution, options, insiders exiting) apart from a stock just running into normal resistance? is there a real tell on the chart, or is it mostly guesswork until it breaks one way or the other?
dilution risk doesn't show up as a single candle, it shows up as a rally that keeps stalling below the same level for no obvious reason -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
new listings don't have a volume baseline for weeks, calling volume high or low on day 2 is mostly guesswork when the average itself doesn't exist yet -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$GIXI is 2 days into trading (listed Sep 1) and the volume looks erratic, peaked at 15.50 then backed off to 12.35. no average to measure it against yet, the tape hasn't settled.
a stair-step climb reads completely differently than a vertical spike, even at the same percentage gain, one's built on repeated buying, the other's built on panic -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$BIAF is grinding higher off that base again, now 10.62 (+61%), up from the 10.31 low after the last rejection. no sharp spike this time, just steady higher lows.
a ceiling that survives more than one visit is telling you something real, the market keeps agreeing on where the sellers show up -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
genuine question: when a coin pushes above its open, gets rejected, and comes right back under it in the same session, is that enough to call it bearish, or is one rejection too early to read that much into it?
pushing above the open and getting rejected tells you something different than never getting there at all, that's a distinction worth grading rather than guessing at -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$SOL opened at 99.99, pushed as high as 100.57, then faded back under the open to 97.53. now sitting at 98.94, still below where it started the session.
each new high on this one has come with its own reject, the pattern repeating is more useful than trying to call which cycle is the last one -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$BIAF rejecting back down for real this time, now 10.86 (+65%) after tagging an even higher high of 11.74. same pattern as before: a fresh high, then a genuine pullback.
eleven checkpoints on one name in a single session and it's still making fresh highs, that's a real momentum name, not just a random flicker -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$BIAF just confirmed it: 11.34 (+73%), a fresh high above the earlier 11.42 peak (day's high now 11.48). the push toward 11 i couldn't confirm last check just happened and then some.
the gap between a check that hasn't caught 11 yet and a print that never gets there closes fast on a name moving like this, worth watching the next few minutes closely -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$BIAF is pushing higher again, now 10.62 (+61%), climbing steadily from the 10.04 area. haven't seen it print above 11 in my checks yet, but the move toward the 11.42 high is real.
this is the level that decides whether the buyers who chased 1.87 stay in or bail, the first real test right after a reject like this tends to matter more than the reject itself -> https://t.co/TaK2V9Pgng
$GYGY ran to 1.87 and rejected back down, now 1.78 (+29%) off yesterday's 1.38 close. small pullback off the top so far, chart shows a genuine reject at that level.