Public question to @larabirdsnp and Kate Nevens:
You were held for around eight hours by Israeli authorities and then turned away at the Allenby Bridge while trying to enter the West Bank as part of a Progressive International delegation.
Your stated aim was solidarity with olive harvesters and events in Ramallah.
Meanwhile, back in Scotland:
Drug deaths hit 1,133 in 2025 an 11% rise, still the highest rate in Europe by a wide margin, with cocaine and nitazenes driving the toll.
This is after more than a decade of SNP government.
Homeless deaths rose 38% to 232 in 2025.
The Scottish Government declared a housing emergency, yet the numbers keep climbing.
Child poverty and food insecurity remain entrenched, with large numbers of Scottish families relying on food banks and cutting back on meals.
You are elected to represent people in Scotland and at Westminster.
Is flying out on a foreign solidarity trip, then complaining about being stopped, the best use of your time right now?
These are the people some of you trust to run Scotland?
What I find so nauseating about this clip is how seriously Watson takes herself.
The members of the progressive woke supremacist cult seriously believe they are disciples of righteousness; that it’s impossible they could be wrong.
And so, with astonishing narcissism, Watson - a mediocre actress not overburdened with insight - portrays herself as bearing an overflowing heart, and carrying terrible burdens of conflicting emotions.
Let’s remember what this is about.
@jk_rowling has been fighting for sex-based rights that have underpinned safeguarding for decades to be maintained and protected.
Watson, meanwhile, has placed the demands of trans-identifying men ahead of her own biological sex, and utterly betrayed Rowling, who has been subjected to horrific abuse and death threats for daring to speak up for women.
Yet Watson portrays herself here as a saintly figure who somehow, within her unimpeachable soul, may be able to find it in herself to acknowledge some of the debt she owes to a mentor without whom she’d be nothing.
It’s a shame she was ever cast in the Harry Potter movies. Had she been passed over, we wouldn’t now have to endure this painful, self-regarding garbage.
J.K. Rowling could have kept quiet, banked her billions and stayed everyone's favourite author.
She didn't.
She put her name, her reputation and her own money on the line for women.
She founded Beira's Place, a women-only centre in Edinburgh for survivors of sexual violence. She has funded legal fights to protect women's rights and women-only spaces. And she has given a voice to women who were too scared to speak.
For that she has faced years of death threats, rape threats and torture threats.
She hasn't flinched once.
That's not just a literary legend. That's a hero for women everywhere. 👏🇬🇧
Let’s be clear:
If I’m not going to sleep with you, I don’t need to know anything about your sexuality.
And children—who are not going to sleep with anyone—certainly don’t.
Your sexuality is not sacred. It’s not a personality, it’s not a protected class of performance art, and it’s not the center of anyone’s moral universe but your own. Unless we are in a relationship, I am not obligated to acknowledge, affirm, or be exposed to your private desires—especially not in public, and especially not in front of children.
This used to be understood. Now it’s called hate.
No, We Don’t Owe You an Audience
Sexuality belongs in the private realm. It is intimate by definition. If you feel compelled to wear your kink on your sleeve—or on a float, or in a first-grade classroom—you are not inviting understanding, you are demanding submission. You are violating others’ right not to participate.
Consent doesn’t vanish because your fetish is “progressive.” If anything, the burden is higher.
No one consents to being flashed on the subway. No one consents to a stranger’s arousal. No one consents to a stranger telling their child about masturbation, kink, gender identity, or pornographic categories under the guise of “inclusive sex ed.” Yet all of this is happening now—in public parks, in classrooms, in televised programming.
It is not tolerance. It is invasion.
Children Are Not Here to Validate You
Children are not queer. Children are not sexual. Children do not need to “see themselves represented” in a spectrum of adult desire. This idea—that identity is only valid if sexualized and mirrored—is narcissism, not pedagogy.
There is no legitimate reason to initiate a child into the language of sexual preference, gender identity, or alternative lifestyles. The only people who benefit from that dynamic are those looking to normalize boundary violations.
Let me state it plainly:
Children who are not going to have sex do not need to be exposed to sexuality.
Period.
Any adult who insists otherwise is not confused. They are grooming.
Public Fetishism Is Not Liberation
There is a vast difference between being gay and demanding the right to simulate sex acts in front of children. Between being transgender and insisting on teaching kindergartners about breast removal. Between being proud of who you are and insisting the whole world observe your kink play in the street.
This is not diversity. This is decay.
Men in dog masks being walked on leashes by their lovers are not brave—they are forcing strangers into their psychodrama. This is exhibitionism, and when children are present, it becomes criminal exhibitionism.
We used to know this. Peeping, flashing, voyeurism—these were considered red flags. Dangerous behaviors. Early signs of escalation. Now they’re filmed, hashtagged, and funded by public grants.
Stop Calling It Love—It’s Entitlement
This is not about who you love. It’s about how you demand to be seen. If you need the entire public to witness, applaud, and adapt to your sexuality, you’re not a pioneer—you’re an emotional colonizer.
Love does not demand a captive audience. It does not parade past toddlers. It does not demand that schools teach four-year-olds about “preferred pronouns.” Love protects children. Love guards modesty. Love waits.
And if you can’t wait—if you need to be seen, affirmed, and obeyed—you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about power.
Consent Applies to Culture, Too
We teach children that consent is sacred—so why are we failing to apply that lesson to public life?
No child consents to drag queen story hour.
No parent consents to leather harnesses on city floats.
No woman consents to being exposed to male sexuality in the ladies’ room, or in the school library, or anywhere she cannot opt out.
Consent is not just for sex. It’s for everything.
Attention. Language. Presence. Ideology. Imagery.
And we are done pretending we don’t notice when it’s violated.
The boundary is back.
And we are drawing it in bold.
@Perp338 She can F…. Right Off. i stand with @jk_rowling
JK has never said anything offensive, she support trans rights in respect of expressing themselves in anyway they choose, the right to freedom, respect, etc however should not be to the detriment of women rights.
@HelloCanada Burn the house down… now looking for reconciliation 😂😂😂 didnt want to be a Royal, then get a real job like the rest of us helicopter pilot, accountant, Retail store manager etc
@JohnMayKeynesII@UnrepentantYoon Look at the population of Edinburgh, the size of what is classified as the city of Edinburgh… its bubble that is very hard to get into. Most inhabitants come from London / england ..driving up house prices etc . That is not representative of the most of Scotland