JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood

I am what the the name implies.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@athiestboi CHRISTIANITY DEBOOONKED!

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@HankRenter @javierperd2604 None of that follows and there’s no reason to believe that. There’s nothing about interpretation being fallible that implies subjectivity. All fallibility is the possibility of error none of that means that an error was made just that it could be made.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@gagesato @coliflowerz @avatar_fighters Did you even watch legend of Korra? Korra has been described as bombastic and aggressive ever since the show came out what are we talking about? Even an interview interviews the creators describe Korra as that and she remains that way, even when you get to the end of the series.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@SynthSatori @ArthurQuant @jaderants There’s no such thing as a straight man attracted to a “trans woman” granted there are men whom are attracted to men we call the likes of such gay or bisexual. There’s nothing about enforcing definitional clarity that has anything to do with so-called “policing of attraction”.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@SynthSatori @jaderants The term “Trans girl” does not correlate to anything in reality. Therefore, person claiming to be a trans girl, as in a person whom who was a man, but supposedly became a woman. Never made any transition. So yes, it is a man you can use that term if you want. I don’t care.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@ani_meme25 Because Aang never used a sub bending technique he’s cannot be the greatest earth bender? Aang creates armor with his earth bending . He burrows into the ground. He has done far more impressive stuff with his earth bending. Meanwhile, your goat just makes bigger rocks.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@marionumber4 @MeowSkullsFN_ He never said that, but alright

[Zack @Asmongold]

@HasanabiProd Socioeconomic conditions are a cope

Even when you control for income, you have dramatically different racial crime rates

The same thing is true for men vs women

Not genetically inferior, another pathetic attempt to get me banned over inconvenient truths

[🦬 𝕸𝖆𝖙𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖜 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖊𝖗 🦬 @DarthHarryson]

Damn...

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@luimacronne @Shawn_star2002 @Fish_Flakes546 @remarks @Grxit You think because word has “progress” in it and because the word progress by itself refers some idea of change. That’s what “Progressivism” then means? It’s not too late to roll this back.

[Optimus ⛩️ @SubToOptimus]

No self-proclaimed Christian should ever use this. This is the exact opposite of what Christianity is. You can speak with Jesus for free yourself and it isn't some mockery of the Lord some vibe coder put together.

[InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones @InspiringPhilos]

A wolf in sheep’s clothing is trying to split Christians and make us side with false religions.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@Rothmus “Slavery DEBOONKED guys! Because picking cotton maybe once or twice over a short duration in the modern period. That’s totally the same as being forced to do the same thing with no protection over eight hours a day with the threat of whippings and beatings.”

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@NAccount62870 @jarldietrich Not understanding what Sola Scriptura is. The bible not telling you what books it’s made up of is irrelevant to Sola Scriptura it is a question of authority that happens after you have the canon. There’s no reason to believe we need an infallible authority to know the bible.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@killer_kunst @PatoRandomplus @tr0skinz @ZELLKLUMPEN Exactly, because most vegans don’t buy it to the existence of God. As I’ve say it earlier, we have fundamentally different ontological and epistemic principles. Any arguments from now on will simply be attacks upon atheism or theism which isn’t the topic

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@killer_kunst @PatoRandomplus @tr0skinz @ZELLKLUMPEN This isn’t because it said so it’s allowed argument. Christians are classical theist. We believe that God is the maximally perfect entity in the universe, and is the source of morality. His commands are not arbitrary but a reflection of truth.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@tr0skinz @killer_kunst @ZELLKLUMPEN This just gets into the differences in our ontological views as I’ve said earlier. You seemed to hold to some sort of morally equivalent animal ontology I don’t grant that.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@tr0skinz @killer_kunst @ZELLKLUMPEN Well no, as I’ve already stated. In classical theism God is goodness he can’t make arbitrary decisions. Everything he declares is good. He is the source of goodness. And this is projecting human concepts onto a lot of animals who just don’t have capability

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@tr0skinz @killer_kunst @ZELLKLUMPEN Consideration and just doing arbitrary killings this anti-life and against creation. But if a human were to kill an animal for food, that would be justified. Randomly stomping on flowers is an anti-life behavior as well.

[JustSomeRandoInTheNeighborhood @SomeRando134]

@tr0skinz @killer_kunst @ZELLKLUMPEN No, because I don’t grant that suffering is inherently bad. The forest is built up on evolutionary suffering yet we aren’t burning down the forest in an attempt to end the suffering of all the creatures and Christian ethics doesn’t allow for arbitrary killings creation deserves..