arthur22

"If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything." - Ronald H Coarse

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@F_Desouche En France il vaut 100x mieux créer des associations pour détourner l'argent public avec des subventions que créer une startup

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@WallStreetMav THE big question

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@TowaYowaIowa Il va chez les sauvages, qu'est-ce qu'il espérait?

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@YoonnsOfficiel Qui déteste les Asiatiques? Les vrais racistes: les arabes et les noirs!

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@YoonnsOfficiel À deux doigts de se rendre compte que ce qu'il nomme "les racistes" sont juste des gens qui n'aiment pas les sauvages 😂

[ℂ𝕠𝕞𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕋𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕟𝕟 ✨ @CommanderTorenn]

@DeputesEnsemble La culture est libre, ce qui est questionné c’est son financement public.

Dilapider l’argent des autres n’a jamais été une liberté fondamentale.

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@9mmsmg I can easily understand why Modi would do that. What's incomprehensible is why Western leaders agree to that, and why the people don't put their heads on spikes for it

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules.

Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead.

Why now?

Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups.

Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences.

This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else.

When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@TVietor08 @NewYorker Smart move

[Alex Pfeiffer @AlexPfeiffer]

In the WSJ today

[Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith]

The UK police have become the political enforcement arm of the Labour Party government, used when social engineering nudges no longer work.

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@ITROriginal Poor woman didn't know how to ride a bike

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@CllrLukeEvans

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@AutismCapital Must've been a plot to buy back their own stock or something

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@stulvu @found_it_funny Children don't make decisions, the adults and doctors around them do

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@found_it_funny Any doctor who performs irreversible operations or treatments on teenage children should be sent to jail

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@Pirat_Nation The worst thing is that snobs will overpay this $499 phone that's worth $100 tops just as a flex

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@LEXPRESS 1/6 ? Où est le reste?

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@Asmongold @unvarnishedvoid No, the problem is that the poor are a tool used by the left to steal taxpayer money and make it disappear into their pockets via unvetted programs and NGOs.
The left has turned welfare into a goldmine.

[arthur22 @ArthurQuant]

@nypost