This is one of the biggest weaknesses of the field of Music Theory, especially in the way it's taught. Lots of looking for the *what* and barely any discussion of the *why*.
It's our first semester trying out our new theory curriculum and I've never had more students tell me "I love theory" and "theory is my favorite class."
@12tonevideos Happy birthday, Cory!
Sequences (playing the same tune again, but higher or lower) give us both novelty & familiarity at the same time, causing a double-dose of dopamine.
@12tonevideos I also think it's pretty good. And I'm glad that YouTube is recommending the video that you straight up said "Yeah, this one's not gonna do well with the algorithm"
I find it fascinating that current hip-hop has a genre convention that makes it totally acceptable for the artist to casually use their own name in the lyrics as it if was "son", "girl", "you", etc.
In other genres, that would feel really weird.
@Luci_Alessio To be clearer about this: If someone wrote a song that sounds vaguely classical, but it was in the Romantic or Baroque era, saying "classical" works, especially when talking to someone who isn't a professional music theorist or historian. They'll get what you mean.
It's the verse specifically
Extremely simple rhythms
Chord tones or passing tones
Pentatonic preference
Tight rhyme scheme (AABCCB)
A sequence in the 2nd half of the melody
And a perfect cadence right at the end
That's called a campfire song