@ThePaulAllens@MosabHasanYOSEF What is the expected result when the other party has jettisoned policy positions altogether in favor of doing whatever Trump says?
When the GOP became reactionary, the Dems became conservatives out of necessity.
@evanwch@putxiwhipped5 Do you believe you have the same political power as Elon Musk?
How about the owner of the biggest car dealership, wherever you reside?
I mean...look at this!
https://t.co/m2qutwhX3q
@dillyaali@CaptainD72@ZombieSlay26@temppreacher@MurraySuggests "Our asassinations were just!"
Seriously, we asassinated Soliemani...what is the proper response to that?
If Iran, for example, had the IRGC killed Mark Esper with a targeted drone strike while on his visit to Baghdad in 2019, what would/should the US have done in response?
@dharv007@temppreacher@MurraySuggests What?
We were at war with them for 3 years. 35,000 Americans lost their lives in said conflict and over 100,000 more were wounded.
@MYOHMYreal@mehdirhasan No, but they've convinced you that Platner's past behavior makes him somehow more problematic than ANYONE that has enabled and/or denied the ongoing genocide perpertated by Israel.
How does that moral calculus actually work?
@ijbailey What could Platner have possibly done in his past the wouldn't be a "lesser evil," when compared to enabling or denying the genocide currently being perpetrated by the Israeli state?
@clusterbitch_ No.
Graham Platner could shoot an old lady in the middle of fifth Avenue and STILL be the "lesser evil," when compared to a candidate actively enabling or denying an ongoing genocide.
@estherzelda0514 No.
In actuality, the left has determined that a lesser evil calculus will ALWAYS favor the individual that refuses to deny genocide or enable it.
Hard to argue against it, honestly.
@DavidAFrench None of what you mentioned, even when combined, comes close to the moral repugnance of enabling and denying the current genocide perpetrated by the state of Israel.
Feel free to present a coherent argument to the contrary.
@AdamT_Brown@abenbaker@ChrisCillizza Are any of those as problematic as, "refuses to acknowledge the obvious genocide being perpetrated by the state of Israel?"
How so?
@ethansteininger@rich_toronto In your hypothetical, it's a 51/49 split?
Weird to think that was somehow implied.
If, however, the remaining states decided to ratify an amendment allowing their secession, which is how I envision such a change, what woukd be your argument against it?