@Clif1956@BenefactrChurch@God_Questioner You have a good way of spinning the situation to where those who debate you appear to be ignorant. I've noticed Theists and Flat Earthers *both* are really good at turning arguments away from facts and more towards relations in the comments.
Interesting.
@Clif1956@BenefactrChurch@God_Questioner As Benefactor states. The alternative as far as I can see is that your experiences were chance, which only because you've had a good deal do you have this faith. Meanwhile an insurmountable majority get a bad deal, faith or not. Bias is your enemy more than anything, it seems.
@sj27426@UgoCannon And would you also agree that *many* have also survived similar or worse conditions who do *not* believe in God, or even *hate* him? Because I can assure you, you are not alone, and not everyone who survives these close calls are gonna have your faith.
@invisiblemass01@Universalglitsh Okay so you're just rambling without any focus on random philosophical notions. Everything you've said is entirely irrelevant to the topic I first replied to.
@sj27426@UgoCannon Jesus “could have?” For all you know he did reject it. You cannot be certain survival of any means is divine intervention over happenchance. Saying you “would have” died means little. I can just as easily say I would have died had I not placed my faith in Zeus or anyone but God.
@Clif1956@BenefactrChurch@God_Questioner Then I can rephrase the statement. So what you are *sure* of has no logical basis to be true, it is as reasonable as any other explanation that fits the explanations. So I could ask, *why* be more certain of *this* answer than any other? What favors it over others, besides faith?
@sj27426@UgoCannon Interesting that he allows an arbitrary amount of danger to exist for us to run into. A lot of people put themselves in danger they couldn't possibly have known. Not very fair. Parents usually *protect* their children. Parents who let their children do whatever and learn are bad.
@invisiblemass01@Universalglitsh I'm not sure what you're trying to point out here. If God exists, Evolution seemingly doesn't, and if it somehow still does for anyone who isn't a human, then yes, that is a legitimate question *against* God. Why would he be doing that over time?
@Clif1956@BenefactrChurch@God_Questioner Yeah, that's got nothing to do with proof, mate. You can study and learn all you want, it doesn't mean what you read is true. What can you do to *prove* God gave those directives, or was *correct* to do so?
@Olasejoe@radiofreeautumn The laws could self-justify or come from a mechanical engine of a universe. Whatever logic God uses to “self-justify” could instead be applied to a non-concious source of potential power.
@Master_Morrdred@dcnldotdev@Universalglitsh I've discussed this in my latest screenshot. To summarize, this implies our “wants” fundamentally changing from life to death. That should not be possible with influencing our desires.